Tom_A

Joined on Aug 19, 2010

Comments

Total: 181, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Ben Stonewall: Waiting for the digital fuji 6x9😇

I have the Fuji GA 645, a perfect travel companion that I still use regularly.
Indeed I can easily imagine it with a 645 sensor and a screen, and otherwise almost identical because it is so good, except that the AF speed could be inline with modern expectations.

Link | Posted on Jun 28, 2016 at 08:06 UTC
On article Hands-on with Hasselblad X1D (782 comments in total)
In reply to:

HenriAntoine: This will be excellent for those who made the most of the legendary Mamiya 7 and 7ii, which is a 6x7 rangefinder camera, highly portable with the very best image quality in film MF. This will indeed be a game changer. It looks ideal for unobtrusive handheld documentary photography that aims for the highest image quality. That was - and still is - what the Mamiya 7 does best.

Fully agree with Henri except that 3.5 is 3.5 for light metering purpose. Not 2.8, If you use a hand light meter you don't need to set the size of the sensor/film
Only dof vs view angle has a difference

Link | Posted on Jun 23, 2016 at 08:04 UTC
On article Hands-on with Hasselblad X1D (782 comments in total)
In reply to:

itaibachar: Looks like a big Instagram toy... and since when is 44x33mm medium format?
It's an "APS-C" MF, with "aps-c MF" lenses...

It has almost 70% more sensor area than full frame, which will make a difference, and is today enough to be called mf.
Of course more would be cool, but the camera would then be more expensive.

Link | Posted on Jun 23, 2016 at 07:56 UTC
On article Hands-on with Hasselblad X1D (782 comments in total)

I think it looks promising.
I am still a regular user of several film based medium format cameras. The tonality of the pictures is awesome.
If true that Fuji is working on a digital MF camera, I could easily imagine an update of their wonderful GA645 (google it and look for it in the 2nd hand market!) which is a personal fave travel companion. Imagine the GA645 with today's autofocus speed and with a screen at the back, it wouldn't need big ergonomic changes. It would be wonderful.

Link | Posted on Jun 23, 2016 at 07:49 UTC as 127th comment
In reply to:

Tom_A: In a way it reminds me of my lovely fuji ga645 rangefinder medium format film camera. Very basic controls and viewfinder information, forcing you to slow down (usually a good thing in photography), and the results are truly superb. But oh, the frustration of waiting until the film is developed & scanned or printed!
I still love to use this camera every few months (and my nikon fm2 and rolleiflex which are equally bare bones), they make you more careful when making picture.
So I can see the perverse minimal appeal of this new leica, but would find it too frustrating to use as my only camera.

Sorry, I meant to refer to my manual focus GW645 which is conceptually close to this Leica.
I also have the GA645 with autofocus.
I even have a 6x9 model i sometimes use for landscapes, but it has no built in light meter hence even less convenient thant the Leica! I use it with an old lunasix, or with an iphone light metering app.

Truly awesome cameras, those fuji medium format rangefinders. Lovely image quality... If you can wait for the results!

Link | Posted on Apr 29, 2016 at 04:23 UTC

In a way it reminds me of my lovely fuji ga645 rangefinder medium format film camera. Very basic controls and viewfinder information, forcing you to slow down (usually a good thing in photography), and the results are truly superb. But oh, the frustration of waiting until the film is developed & scanned or printed!
I still love to use this camera every few months (and my nikon fm2 and rolleiflex which are equally bare bones), they make you more careful when making picture.
So I can see the perverse minimal appeal of this new leica, but would find it too frustrating to use as my only camera.

Link | Posted on Apr 29, 2016 at 01:38 UTC as 197th comment | 2 replies
On article Student takes 2016 Zeiss Photography Award top prize (230 comments in total)

On the linked Zeiss webpage you can see other pictures of the winning project. Together they make for a very well done document.

Link | Posted on Apr 13, 2016 at 08:43 UTC as 40th comment
On article Leica Q In-depth Review (1118 comments in total)

A colleague who is a keen amateur bought it, and is very happy with it. He doesn't use his big camera gear anymore, prefers walking around with the Q. But then he and I are of a generation that still thinks that an FM2 with a fixed lens was one of the perfect photo tools!
I tried it and I loved the operation. Simple, to the point. Personally I would have preferred a 35mm lens with 50mm crop mode.
I have not seen the resulting files, only looked at the lcd, tge he lens is indeed awesome. My colleague is very happy with the results.
It is not cheap but I can see the appeal against a 5d or 8x0.

Link | Posted on Mar 24, 2016 at 03:37 UTC as 129th comment

An interesting alternative, I am curious about the results.
Only issue is for me as a left eye photographer is thar it would not be very ergonomic for me.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 03:33 UTC as 88th comment
In reply to:

Nick Spiker: It's too bad really, you've taken a SLR flange distance, but not given us the benefit of a mirror. So now we have to use the screen and have to use Sigma lenses. It's a sub frame camera, with a full frame size mount, so now we've wasted the extra area with a crop factor.
Good job :(
Don't get me wrong, I love the Foveon design, I even have a SD-14, but can we please get a full frame with a short flange distance?

The further flange distance however makes it easier to create lenses
Because the light should fall as perpendicular as possible on the sensor for good results.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 03:30 UTC

Very cool and interesting article. I had expected more automation!

Link | Posted on Feb 1, 2016 at 21:17 UTC as 39th comment
On article Going Pro: We interview Fujifilm execs in Tokyo (367 comments in total)
In reply to:

Tom_A: I have a Fuji GA645 medium format AF rangefinder.
Compact, light, stellar results. Same approach in digital would be awesome...

The GA645 is truly a gem. And user friendly!

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2016 at 03:45 UTC
On article Going Pro: We interview Fujifilm execs in Tokyo (367 comments in total)

I have a Fuji GA645 medium format AF rangefinder.
Compact, light, stellar results. Same approach in digital would be awesome...

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2016 at 01:27 UTC as 84th comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

stevstoc: I converted to Fuji a couple of years back. I shoot with an X-Pro 1 and an X-E1.
I just love using these cameras, much much more than any other since the good old MF film camera days.
The quality on the Fujis take some beating, especially when you consider the "feel" of the finished images. They are are joy to use....slow but a joy.
There were several things I would like to have seen on the X-pro 2 and minus the moveable screen, everything (And some) has been added or improved. My X-Pro 2 is on order and I can't wait until February to get my hands on it.
You can keep your mega Nikons and Canons....Fuji for me every time baby!
Main thing guys...buy what you want and need, not what everyone else tells you to get. Happy snapping!

I bought the XE-1 with the 35mm kit exactly the week when it was released, an aggressively priced combination. Very very nice results. Pin sharp and when I use jpg I like to set a film colour profile.
Its slower than autofocus makes it not good for action, but otherwise I am very happy. Meanwhile I also have the standard zoom and the 23mm, all are excellent lenses.
Hence not sure what was there to dislike about the xe1? I could conceivably be in the market for the xpro2, yet we have other costs in the household now.
I was a Nikon user before, used a d200 for many years, of course an older camera yet with good lenses. I do prefer the fuji lenses and relative compactness though.

Not sure why

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2016 at 00:59 UTC
In reply to:

Searching: The 35 f2 on the Fujitsu is too limiting a focal length for a travel camera.

Actually I find 35mm equivalent a wonderfully universal walk around lens. I loved it in my film days (FM2 or F3 with only the 35mm lens during trips!), and I still like the aps equivalent of 23-24mm.

Link | Posted on Dec 18, 2015 at 12:27 UTC

While on holiday in Japan last June, I bought an XA2 kit as a gift for my wife. Bought at popular discounter BIC camera, the price was very low.
We were both pleasantly surprised by the general quality of the output at all usual iso levels.
the output didn t feel much behind my XE-1 with the more expensive kit zoom.
The xa2 is also a joy to use.

Link | Posted on Dec 11, 2015 at 01:27 UTC as 32nd comment
In reply to:

Frank_BR: The new generation of high-resolution lenses and sensors for the 135 format have practically caught up with the digital medium format. Add that global electronic shutters will make the leaf shutter totally obsolete. Does the digital medium format have a future?

50mp on a big sensor will look better than 50mp on a small sensor (assuming the sensors are both good). The lens quality and small diffraction effects will have less impact on the bigger sensor area. A ff 35mm camera like a d800 is best set to f8 because of that.
There is also a kind of beautiful depth effect you get even at standard apertures with mf.
What i still dream about is to one day be able to convert my beautiful classic rolleiflex to a digital camera with full size 52x52mm sensor, even if at today's resolution. I made my best pictures with it. Not only because of its technical excellence but also because it forces you to slow down.

Link | Posted on Dec 4, 2015 at 15:10 UTC

Mamiya 6 and 7 were superb medium format rangefinders, like big Leica M's and suitable for traveling. I still own a few Fuji MF rangefindzrs with dimilar philosophy and quality.
It would be awesome to see Phase 1 resurrecting the concept of a portable MF rangefinder in the digital world.

Link | Posted on Dec 4, 2015 at 04:38 UTC as 4th comment
In reply to:

Frank_BR: The new generation of high-resolution lenses and sensors for the 135 format have practically caught up with the digital medium format. Add that global electronic shutters will make the leaf shutter totally obsolete. Does the digital medium format have a future?

A D800 with a top nikon lens is a powerful tool.
At the same time when you compare to an MF camera with a sensor with roughly similar resolution you will know the answer why they are still being made...

Link | Posted on Dec 4, 2015 at 04:30 UTC
On article Fujifilm X100T successor rumored to feature new lens (334 comments in total)
In reply to:

donCortizone: Fuji should improve the optics, if it's possible to do it without making the camera any larger.

Hopefully they can also bring their AF up to par with the best micro 4/3.

If anything the Fuji optics is the one thing that does least of all need to be updated.

Link | Posted on Aug 27, 2015 at 17:01 UTC
Total: 181, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »