JohnEwing: Woo hooooo!!!! I must get in a sack of brown coal to power my Weston Hyper IV.
But seriously though, while a hard core will keep at it I think that for most nostalgics initial delight will pall after the first couple of shots, when the pictures fail to appear on the LCD the camera doesn't have. Retro look is great, retro tech maybe not so attractive.
Oh, I like the tech too: I have a couple of IIIs as well, a Nikon F, a couple of Oly OM1s and a bunch of others - my avatar is the taking lens of my Mamiya C220. They are lovely items of equipment and some of them gave excellent service for decades. But for power and flexibility, and above all post-processing, digital kit is hard to beat. I'll probably try Ferrania when/if it finally appears, but I don't expect I'll give up digital because of it.
Mind you, there is a certain Zen side to using film: you need to sink into the picture-taking process until what emerges from the camera is perfect. With digital you can just bang away (within limits) and bank on correcting the boobs in PS.
Woo hooooo!!!! I must get in a sack of brown coal to power my Weston Hyper IV.
@DPR: New option needed in "own it/want it/had it" dialogue: "wouldn't touch it with a bargepole".
samhain: It escaped me at first, what the 'see impossible' phrase reminded me of.But now i remember: sony's 'Make.Believe'. Is it just me or is Canon's new catch phrase clearly a bad knock-off?
Yebbut both "Make.Believe" and "Think different" make sense.
Meet the new crap, same as the old crap.
"Impossible" seems to mean getting marketing oiks to stop mangling English.
Horses for courses. Apart from a toughened phone with a sensor the size of a match-head and a toughened Panny with a 1/2.33" sensor I have a range of cameras with sensors from 1" up to FF. I wouldn't take anything under 1" out with me to commit serious photography, so for me that's the minimum. Exactly which camera(s) I take depends on the venue: sometimes an SLR is too intrusive, sometimes the smaller cameras are too slow.
But if I were to recommend a single camera for an enthusiast with no back (or budget) problems, it'd be the FF every time.
Cyril Reif: I find all the obsession with upgrades and finding reasons to upgrade amusing. I've been a photography enthusiast since 1962 when I got my first SLR, a Canon RM and then got a Nikon F Photomic FTn in 1971, which I used for 26 years.....when you've got a great product there is no reason to upgrade!
Ditto: 25 ASA pushed to a dizzy 32!
Good point. Renault nearly did themselves in 30 or 40 years ago by producing two models of car with nearly identical specs (Renault 9 & 11).
All the same, I can see a market for this in folk who don't want a bunch of lenses to carry, or already have same for a non-Panny system and just want something self-contained. I already have a bunch of Nikon stuff with the odd Panny, Sony & Fuji thrown in, but I could imagine enjoying this beastie. Couldn't be bothered getting into 4/3 lenses, though - in fact I already tried and sold them all.
Drop resistant?Waterproof?User-changeable battery?
Or just another hothouse plant?
And a big THANK-YOU to Canon!!!!
...for having the courage to provide so much amusement.
Jesus wept, this is pathetic. Does it come with a sick bag?
raztec: Fuji would be wise to make an X100 full frame with a fixed 35mm lens. I'm sure there is a market for it amongst enthusiasts considering the success of the X100 already.
For their interchangeable lens bodies, they're better committing to the APS size, improving AF and video quality, and expanding their lens lineup. They are right to worry about the cost and size of such a FF system and stretching themselves too thin.
MF... something the size of a Plaubel Makina. That'd be nice.
On the one hand he doesn't say much more than you'd expect for someone in his position.
On the other hand... I tend to believe him. That's nice.
Jon Schick: So it costs £26 more than the Panasonic in the UK..... I'd normally buy the latter (I had two LC1s) but at that differential the Leica is probably the better deal..... Especially if you take potential resale price into account.
£26 for a Lightroom licence and a red dot - nae bad. I dare say there's a fancy box, too.
This is getting confusing: X100 - RX100 - LX100. What is it about the letter X that gives it such a aura? Chuck Yaeger's aeroplane or vague memories of school algebra spring to mind. Oh aye, X-Men too, whatever that is.
Anyway, never mind all that. This looks like a little X-E1 and very nice that is too. I'd buy it if the missus would countenance me adding a 9th camera to my already expensive kit. Apart from the zoom it does rather cover what my X100 does, though.
What do the bezel-like markings round the screen do, apart from trying to make it look like an alarm clock?
Grey may be better than all black, but I'd rather have it in trad black'n'silver like the X100. Still, if somebody buys me a grey one (fat hope) I won't say no.
Zvonimir Tosic: This camera would've been a real gem if it had a lens with real, manual, well-dampened, yummy helical focus with distance scale, and not focus by wire. Then it could be used off the hip, manually prefocused, etc, without looking at the LCD/VF. And instead of an EV dial on top, a small LCD on top, that summarises all crucial parameters in 2 sqare cm, not looking around the entire top plate plus lens.Everything else is very much polished up by this model.
Don't really agree re the LCD - I like the EV dial as it is. I don't need to switch on to see the settings.
They could, however, have got rid of their nonsensical lens-hood/etc mounting system and just put a 49mm filter thread round the front end like a sane manufacturer.
JohnEwing: Video really has little place in a camera such as this, but Fuji must have decided that poor video is better than the hoo-hah that leaving it out would make in the reviews. It's probably better to have it reviewed, as here, as a couple of ho-humming paragraphs than have the omission trumpetted in review headlines. I'd certainly never use it.
Well, I suppose so. I only ever take a few minutes of movie per year, mostly when I'm on my bike. Not with my X100, though.