voz

voz

Lives in Sweden Sweden
Joined on Dec 28, 2008

Comments

Total: 27, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On Leica announces X Vario zoom compact with APS-C sensor article (757 comments in total)

Distortion correction gone wild?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2013 at 14:48 UTC as 299th comment
In reply to:

LiSkynden: Innovative design? What's with that? In my eyes it looks just another P&S camera.

That was a joke, right? If not, design is more than meets the eye. Think inside the camera. Think engineering.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 5, 2012 at 13:27 UTC

To me, this is very good news. It was a gamble. Would people realize that a big sensor is desirable thing. Or should we just go with the megapixels. I honestly never thought this camera would take off. But with publicity like this it might very well do. Which I applaud.

(Excuse my English.)

Direct link | Posted on Nov 5, 2012 at 08:55 UTC as 40th comment
On Review: Nokia 808 PureView article (354 comments in total)
In reply to:

MichaelEchos: Oversampling technology is not new...

Did anyone say it was?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 31, 2012 at 06:20 UTC
In reply to:

IcyVeins: Nobody is going to buy this lens except for suckers and people who want to brag about how badass their lens is.

You wanna bet? How about people who want a large zoom range, and don't care that much about edge to edge sharpness and/or shallow focus? I know quite a few of those (they use a 18-200 today).

Direct link | Posted on Jun 14, 2012 at 07:42 UTC
On Leica M-Monochrom preview (449 comments in total)

Not for me, but nice to see companies doing their own thing.

Direct link | Posted on May 11, 2012 at 20:16 UTC as 73rd comment
In reply to:

Nikonworks: Save your money, look elsewhere.

Why?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 26, 2012 at 10:40 UTC

Great, now I'm interested in the X10 again. But how will I know that I get the revised version? New name?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 26, 2012 at 07:25 UTC as 105th comment

Nope, I still think the 6MP on my D40 is plenty enough.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 19, 2012 at 07:50 UTC as 133rd comment | 6 replies
On First Impressions: Using the Fujifilm X-Pro1 article (228 comments in total)
In reply to:

Nikonworks: Your following words sound as those of a fan club participant, not as a formal reviewer at DPReview:

" Our first impressions are very positive though, and I hope this article will reassure and encourage anyone that has been watching the X-series and waiting for Fujifilm to 'get it right'."

Your use of the word 'hope' indicates your bias toward Fuji.

Your use of the word 'encourage' confirms the validity of my remarks posted here.

Oh well, what a shame to see DPReview take this road.

Fan this, fan that. I think we all need to relax.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 4, 2012 at 09:19 UTC
On dpreview.com gets mobile article (110 comments in total)

Great! I've been waiting for this. Looking forward to the "mobilized" forum section as well.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 7, 2012 at 08:08 UTC as 69th comment

Interesting. I was planning to buy this camera, primarily due to the optical viewfinder and the fast lens, but the "white orbs" turned me off. So if they indeed have a working solution for this, I might very well get one in the end. But we shall wait and see.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 6, 2012 at 09:00 UTC as 57th comment | 2 replies

Raw would have been nice...

Direct link | Posted on Feb 1, 2012 at 07:13 UTC as 34th comment | 6 replies
On First full-res Fujifilm X-Pro1 images appear on the web article (216 comments in total)

"Page Not Found"

Direct link | Posted on Feb 1, 2012 at 07:09 UTC as 69th comment
On Preview: Canon PowerShot G1 X large sensor zoom compact article (778 comments in total)

Wow, it's a new ball game with the software corrected lenses.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 9, 2012 at 15:14 UTC as 216th comment
On Just Posted: Olympus PEN Mini review article (112 comments in total)
In reply to:

rsf3127: NEX-5N rules!

Very mature comment.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 24, 2011 at 14:00 UTC
On Planned site maintenance on dpreview.com article (41 comments in total)

I can't believe it. Now for sure I though the "Threads started by users on your ignore list" header would be fixed, i.e. _inside_ the forums table even if you make the browser window bigger. It seems like such an easy thing to fix, yet it's been that way for months.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 20, 2011 at 09:11 UTC as 14th comment | 1 reply
On Site updates: Gear List, forum articles and more article (25 comments in total)

Nice, but is the "Ignore List Header Bug" that I've reported twice ever going to be fixed?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 15, 2011 at 07:13 UTC as 11th comment
In reply to:

magnumgf: Looks nice with the retro style and metal body. Otherwise totally incomprehensible. Can anyone tell me what the point of a viewfinder that does not show what you get in the picture, it only shows 85% and it has parallax error. On top of that it does not show ANY shooting information, not even focus. You would be better off looking over the top of the camera if you ask me.
There are other cameras out there with much bigger sensors, can be fitted with electronic viefinders that give you all the shooting into, can use a variety of lenses and only cost slightly more. Why would you pick the Fuji over them?

A functional fail, but looks sweet.

magnumgf: Yep, some of them. Some of them even worse (like on the Canon PowerShot S400). Still invaluable.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 11, 2011 at 10:54 UTC
In reply to:

magnumgf: Looks nice with the retro style and metal body. Otherwise totally incomprehensible. Can anyone tell me what the point of a viewfinder that does not show what you get in the picture, it only shows 85% and it has parallax error. On top of that it does not show ANY shooting information, not even focus. You would be better off looking over the top of the camera if you ask me.
There are other cameras out there with much bigger sensors, can be fitted with electronic viefinders that give you all the shooting into, can use a variety of lenses and only cost slightly more. Why would you pick the Fuji over them?

A functional fail, but looks sweet.

Oh, this OVF whining over and over again. I've lived with parallax viewfinders for around 30 years. No problems. And remember, the realistic alternative to this kind of viewfinder is no viewfinder at all. That's how most of today's compacts are designed.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 11, 2011 at 08:10 UTC
Total: 27, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »