In term of pure noise, there is an improvement over 5DMk2, but against the D800... reduced at the same size, the D800 has in overall better noise than the 5D3 and we shouldn't talk about the monstruous D4.... I'm a canon fan but how the hell canon isn't able to equal nikon which, as I read somewhere on DPR, isn't manufacturing his own sensors (Sony)?
Direct link |
Posted on Mar 29, 2012 at 16:29:54 UTC
as 20th comment
| 1 reply
I checked the last picture with Kevin Lynch. I googled the name and find the original picture which is perfectly sharp. They used a mere photoshop motion blur on it. easy to recover (try with focus magic)...
What about blur with all our camera noise?
Direct link |
Posted on Oct 17, 2011 at 19:17:44 UTC
as 22nd comment
| 12 replies
In term of pure noise, there is an improvement over 5DMk2, but against the D800... reduced at the same size, the D800 has in overall better noise than the 5D3 and we shouldn't talk about the monstruous D4.... I'm a canon fan but how the hell canon isn't able to equal nikon which, as I read somewhere on DPR, isn't manufacturing his own sensors (Sony)?
Durandalfr: I will only buy it if it brings a slowmo video mode (120 or 240fps).
well I would like to have it in replacement of my little viewty which can do 120fps, at least.
I will only buy it if it brings a slowmo video mode (120 or 240fps).
first time since long I haven't been fascinated like that by a video. Awesome
I checked the last picture with Kevin Lynch. I googled the name and find the original picture which is perfectly sharp. They used a mere photoshop motion blur on it. easy to recover (try with focus magic)...
What about blur with all our camera noise?