agilestyle

Lives in Italy Italy
Joined on Sep 23, 2010

Comments

Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9
On article Just Posted: Canon PowerShot G1 X samples gallery (425 comments in total)
In reply to:

agilestyle: I have expectations on the G1X... broken on rocks when i see this gallery.
What do not impress me at all here is the BOKEH.
Is only visible by shooting at 60.1, where the max aperture is forced to F5.8.
There are no traces of it at wider angle:, no surprise here, cause the lens is far by being fast.
This is a clear compromise imposed by fitting a compact broad-uses-zoom (no complains to Canon).
If i'd choose the G1X, i have to forget the great creativity that the 20-1.7 and 45-1.8 lenses allow me on my GF1.
What i'd get is a good quality camera, with high ISO capabilities, that avoid bringing some extra lenses with me, but that doesn't excels in any particular area and, i am sure of it, makes my shots more "average".
Please do not start crying with the "it's not the camera, is the photographer" litany, if u shot with a small-camera-fast-lens-combo u understand what i'm talkning about.
That said, i suppose it will be an high-quality, compact, "average" camera.
Best regards.
M. Costa

Lenstip.com also have posted some outside shots taken with the G1X.
I must admit that their gallery is much more encouraging: blur areas are visible also at 15mm F2.8, and IQ is very acceptable even at ISO 12800.
Also interesting is that shooting at 1/20s seem to give you crisp results, meaning that the IS on lens is very effective.
I am really happy since, i repeat, i want to like this PRO G camera.
@howordroark: to me control over DOF is an important topic. This, together with IQ even at HI-ISO, distinguishes a PRO camera from the P&S/small-sensor ones.
That said, we have to wait to put our hands on the first production camera.
Best regards
M. Costa

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2012 at 16:03 UTC
On article Just Posted: Canon PowerShot G1 X samples gallery (425 comments in total)

I have expectations on the G1X... broken on rocks when i see this gallery.
What do not impress me at all here is the BOKEH.
Is only visible by shooting at 60.1, where the max aperture is forced to F5.8.
There are no traces of it at wider angle:, no surprise here, cause the lens is far by being fast.
This is a clear compromise imposed by fitting a compact broad-uses-zoom (no complains to Canon).
If i'd choose the G1X, i have to forget the great creativity that the 20-1.7 and 45-1.8 lenses allow me on my GF1.
What i'd get is a good quality camera, with high ISO capabilities, that avoid bringing some extra lenses with me, but that doesn't excels in any particular area and, i am sure of it, makes my shots more "average".
Please do not start crying with the "it's not the camera, is the photographer" litany, if u shot with a small-camera-fast-lens-combo u understand what i'm talkning about.
That said, i suppose it will be an high-quality, compact, "average" camera.
Best regards.
M. Costa

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2012 at 10:30 UTC as 66th comment | 4 replies
On a photo in the Canon PowerShot G1 X Preview Samples sample gallery (4 comments in total)
In reply to:

VadymA: And note that this is F5.8. The bokeh at F2.8 should be even better.

At 60.4mm is impossible to force aperture to F2.8.
Check the aperture tables on the DPR preview.
Best regards

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2012 at 09:51 UTC
On photo IMG_0169 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (4 comments in total)
In reply to:

VadymA: And note that this is F5.8. The bokeh at F2.8 should be even better.

At 60.4mm is impossible to force aperture to F2.8.
Check the aperture tables on the DPR preview.
Best regards

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2012 at 09:51 UTC
On article Preview: Canon PowerShot G1 X large sensor zoom compact (776 comments in total)

No EVF, no party!

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2012 at 08:53 UTC as 70th comment
On article SLR Magic announces 23mm F1.7 for Sony NEX's E-mount (60 comments in total)

Why the hell this lens is so huge while the Panny 20mm F1.7 is a quarter shorter and comes with AF?
Are the Nex system lenses all plagued by fattness?
Please, make some decent pancacke lens, instead of these heavyweight piece of metal!

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2011 at 21:55 UTC as 2nd comment | 1 reply
On article Just Posted: Samsung NX200 Studio Comparison for JPEG (108 comments in total)

Better than NX100, but JPEG at higher ISO are very worse than Nex 5N or even G3: the noise control is strongly visible even at ISO400.
I suspect RAW files are much better.

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2011 at 11:59 UTC as 13th comment
On article Just Posted: Samsung NX200 Studio Comparison for JPEG (108 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kuturgan: I found NX200's ISO performance is almost better than EP-3 and NEX-5n till ISO1600.
It is more than enough for me because I rarely use even ISO1600.
For me NX200 outperforms other sony and M4/3 EVIL cameras.
I'm totally satisfied with what I see.

R u joking or what?
Noise control is very intrusive and visible even at ISO 400 (see the banknotes on the widget). Comparing the NX200 with the Panny G3 (that has a smaller sensor) is clear how the former suffers in the IQ factor.
I suspect Samsung needs some more experience in the camera area.
Best regards

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2011 at 11:15 UTC
On article Just Posted: Sony NEX-7 Hands-on Video Preview (82 comments in total)

Excellent video, quality and content!

Link | Posted on Oct 15, 2011 at 08:34 UTC as 29th comment
Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9