-
Am I to understand Canon and Nikon are able to build optical stabilizers w/o added elements, as in contrary to Tamron? :)
-
No, I paid 1799€. I am not sure what the number of ED glasses means in RL. So let's wait and see what the performance of the f/4 is. During my Canon years, I loved the 70-200 4 L...
-
No, I paid 1799€. I am not sure what the number of ED glasses means in RL. So let's wait and see what the performance of the f/4 is. During my Canon years, I loved the 70-200 4 L...
-
No, I paid 1799€. I am not sure what the number of ED glasses means in RL. So let's wait and see what the performance of the f/4 is. During my Canon years, I loved the 70-200 4 L...
-
No, I paid 1799€. I am not sure what the number of ED glasses means in RL. So let's wait and see what the performance of the f/4 is. During my Canon years, I loved the 70-200 4 L...
-
-
If this lens would have been available 6 months ago, it would be in my photo bag. Now I already have the f/2,8 VRII. Which is an excellent lens, but per physics also a very heavy and large one....
-
Probably the lightning fast fps rate the 5DIII? :)
-
Probably the lightning fast fps rate of the 5DIII? :)
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
|
| Total messages |
283 |
| Threads started |
16 |
| Last post |
May 11, 2012 |
| Entries |
6 |
| Votes cast |
42 |
| Last entry |
Sep 22, 2009 |
delete has not added any dpreview gear yet.
|