Absolutic: I went through every m4/3 camera and lens. I alsoOwnD800. Just got Sony NEX 5n recently and has been kicking myself ever since for not getting it earlier. U get a brilliant sensor the sameThat $1200 d7000 has for $649. It's crazy. The low ligjtHigh ISoActually seemsBetter than d7000 and DXO markAgrees. I am astounded by iso3200 in PASM and iso6400 in twilight mode. M4/3 and my last one was 16mp g3 was not evenIn same league in dynamic range and low light. 10fps and 4fps modes are excellent. AF after firmware 1.01 update this march is superb and focuses in low light for me no problem. And I am using the slow kit 18-55 lens and I could care less because low light pic are that good. Only full frame is better. It kills my canon 7d in low light. NowMy Nikon d800 is better but it cost five times as much and is a large camera
twilight mode is overrate in my opiniononly use it in extreme low light otherwise why botherbut than the slow shutter with 6 pics together would really kill sharpness although at low noisebut i would rather my pic be noisy but sharp
anyone else ageree?
still can't understand the logic of a 3 that is just $100 cheaper than 5
$100 is too insignificant an amount for two product line
just the touch screen for focus alone is worth more than $100 let alone other enhancement
Really anxious what will they offer in F5 to justify the extra $100
NEX 7 24MP sensor, is that too much to ask?
Jefftan: F3 it is so similar to 5N now, even appearance is about the same.
Now no reason to buy 5N just battery life increase to 470 in F3. $600 is a good price
What will the rumor F5 (5N successor) be? Got NEX 7 sensor?
yes there is auto iso 3200 now in F3no touchscreen2.5 or 5.5 fps (a lot slower than 5N)
Is that 225 gram including battery correct?It maybe without battery
F3 it is so similar to 5N now, even appearance is about the same.
A $2000 camera with this screenScreen size 2.7"Screen dots 230,000
Leica is treating customers like idiotRidiculous!A $200 camera may have better screen
f2 is the key
Almost 2 stop better than others
good news the F2 make all others obsoletenow is time to throw away my Panasonic TS1 and Sony TX5
good job. OlympusYou got my money
No OIS for 20-50mm
Recipe for blurry photo
Sorry if what i say offend people but spending $600 on a small sensor camera is not smartMy $700 nex-5n is a perfect camera and i am sure the $600 nex-c3 is worth every pennySupport good company which provide great product at reasonable price
FUJI camera is always overpriced They are just cheating on rich people but have the negative effect of raising price level in the whole industry
Not that i cannot afford x-pro1 but i would buy a nex-7 if i buy another camera todayWe as photographer have responsibility to support good company for the benefit of all
I have a friend with OCD that always wash his card under tap waterAs far as i know he never lost any photoRegular sd card is already waterproofShame on samsung for selling this like a special feature
It make perfect sense if i have lots of k mount lensBut to someone like me who have noneNo sense at all
Will there be a water-proof MFT camera body from Olympusif so I will definitely buy it
late last year Sept 2010 I recommend my non-photographer friend to buy a Panasonic LX5 when NEX is still in first generation and unproven
Now ask me for recommendation, I would suggest NEX for her.
Almost the same weight with 16mm fix lens an small digital zooming may produce picture that is not worse than LX5
IQ will be way higher than LX5 can ever be especially in low light. She often complain she can't take photo in an aquarium for example.
With NEX no problem
no matter what others say. I still believe mirrorless are the future.
A compact user for 5 years, I will buy a NEX-5N.
DSLR? Are you joking? I don't need weight lifting exercise
All serious compact upgraders or DSLR downgraders if you can call that will all rush to mirrorless
The best trade off for IQ and size. Prices is coming down too. $500 E-PM1 is a hint for future price point of mirrorless
If I can wait 2 years, NEX will fall to $500 or even lower
Compact and DSLR even if survive would be a minority compare with mirrorless
This will happen in the next 5 years in my prediction
Why should I buy this small sensor camera when the Olympus E-PM1 cost $500
$100 more for a small sensor camera?
Anyone tell me why?
I mention again that it worksThe biggest advantage is if after a trip I have 5000 photos and 20G ,I wouldn't have time to back up on 5 DVD
Now each JPEG become less than 1 MB and I can fit almost 5000 pics on 1 DVD
I won't worry about hard drive failure any more
I would happily paid $50 if it is available as a program
no it is no fakeit works
only 18% of original size but indistinguishable 100% crop
After compression I can back up lots of picture in DVD, now all in hard drive and worry about hard drive failure
I would buy the program if it is available
"AW100 helps to create blur free images with the use of Nikon's Vibration Reduction (VR) to minimize camera shake "
This mean no optical image stabilization? $380 just cracy
same price as well established and very good Panasonic TS3
Bring nothing new to the table F3.9 vs TS3 F3.3 and not cheap. Not small too TX10 is less than 150g
Nikon is not really trying to be competitive.