DRNottage: The TS1 and 2 are GREAT! If you're looking for an all-weather machine- BUY ONE when available. Don't even bother with Olympus. These machines have vastly sharper optics and many other excellent features.
Why not bother with Olympics?Are you sure TG-1/TG-2 is not better than thisbetter optics? I don't see it F3.3 vs TG-2 F2?right now the best waterproof camera is Olympus TG seriesThis year TS5 also lost the CCD sensor, the last reason I may choose it is gone
Any difference I can find with TG-1 is 50 ft waterproof compare with 40ftand that's it? They call this TG-2?Oh my!
This is basically the same as TG-1
Disappoint they are not releasing a next generation DPXM camerasame camera as DP1M/Dp2M
Anyone know how this one is different from teh TS-1?
Really, who is going to buy this instead of NEX or MFT?Anyone?
I am surprised Samsung has not giving up on the NX systemespecially with the price. no chance at all in the marketmaybe OK in Korea but not for the world
A simple questionAfter import image into lightroom do I now have 2 copies of the imageone in Lightroom and one in original folder?Thanks
I download all the wide angle pic and conclude that the best are fromRX100 and P7700
A high cost and low cost pic
Hi, reviewerI wish dpreview will answer the age old question of whether one should buy an Enthusiast Compact or mirrorless with kit lens (NEX-F3,E-PL5...etc)
They are about the same price and what will give you better IQ?
Anyone know why only 64 bit version is available?thanks
ogl: Capture One is the best for cameras with weak or without AA filter. I've tested with my cameras and found that it's better than LR and ACR. D800E rules from C1Pro.
photo ninja has no lens correction?big negative
Can some Capture One user explain how this is better than lightroom?better color?I have heard NR is not as good
$300who will paid this ridiculous price?
I want to ask a questionif all these are shoot on a NEX-5N with Zeiss 24mm
Will any one find out any difference even pixel peeping at 100%?
I really doubt it
Simon97: After looking at some cameras using the Sony 16mp APS-C sensor high ISO shots, this camera does not seem all that impressive. The hi ISO shots are soft.
If you don't need the slight improvement of resolution and the stronger bokeh at the given (fixed) focal length of this camera, I'd look for a camera with an APS-C sensor. Get a NEX with a fixed lens for 1/4 the price.
I will say that Sony's 24mp APS-C sensor is disappointing in the high ISO department compared to the 16mp version and this FF sensor.
What you point out is a real important questionWhat is the real advantage of going full frame and not just this cameraTo me if not after shallow DOF no real need to go full frame
Lots of disadvantage besides cost and only real gain may be slightly higher dynamic range (which is enough if processing RAW in APS-C) and better high ISO (also OK with fast lens and APS-C)
HBowman: A SIGMA DP2 Merrill do better for far less money. My two cents ..
I am not sure if it really is true but I sense that the color of feveon sensor is less rich than normal sensor
To me it capture lots of detail but don't seem to catch all the subtle tone and shade of color, which to me is more important than detail
Again this is only my impression. May not be real
Jefftan: I really don't see much difference between this and a good APS-C cameraif one is not after very shallow DOF, no reason to go full frame
The advantage in low light can be obtain by a fast lens in APS-C
maybe there is some dynamic advantage but that is not obvious unless by side by side comparison testing
I really don't see much difference between this and a good APS-C cameraif one is not after very shallow DOF, no reason to go full frame
nothing specialIf I take all these pics with NEX-5N it would not be worse than these