why not buy 14-140mm, similar weight and similar size, 10x zoom
what is the difference between this and metabones?
why don't make the 18-50mm lens available for the Nikon 1 system?
what is the sensor size ? 1/2.3?
Jefftan: I have heard that the lens especially at wide angle is softis that true?
for a fix lens camera if the lens is soft, there really is no reason buying it
I have heard that the lens especially at wide angle is softis that true?
to me Sony added 4K to A6000 and double the priceAre u serious, Sony?
I am going to replace my aging NEX-5N with either the original A6000 or A7 both excellent value. I think I would choose A7
Is this a BSI sensor?
For same sensor size if I have to choose1 stop faster lens but 3 times zoomor 10 times zoom but 1 stop slower lens
I would of course choose 10 times zoomsurprise it take so long for a 10x zoom 1 inch sensor camera
Panasonic finally nail it this time. Now it has no competitorsThe only such product in the market
This is what LX camera should beLX camera should always be a pocket cameraThat LX100 camera concept is wrong. No wonder it don't sell well
Neodp: Price. LOL.
But hey this is the RIGHT basics for a pocket ultra-zoomer. Could be better m43 and bigger; but if you want this size.
street price will fall to $500 within 6 months, I predict
mosc: I was super excited!
Maximum aperture F2.8 - F5.9
And then I wasn't
I am super excitedthis is the first time a pocket size mega zoom with a big 1 inch sensor!and 4K video
what's wrong with F2.8 sensor? This is not a low light camera. But even if someone have to take pics at low light, F2.8 is still OK
this is a ground breaking product!
$450 4k video!amazing
Most interesting product from all company thus farsurprising it takes so long for the 1 inch sensor to be put in a super zoom10X zoom much more useful than other large aperture 1 inch sensor camera
Price is high but it probably would fall to $500 eventuallyI will buy, good product
can u get the same result by pushing RAWi mean brighten up shadow and darken hightligh
I guess not as good as real HDR like this app
the first pic ,A great American traditionis very bad even for small sensor,no detail at allwhy? F8 diffraction?
Frank C.: 35mm...too wide for portraitstoo narrow for landscapesthe no man's land of focal lengthswhat is there to like??
I agree with Frank C.35mm is useless28mm at least,24mm betteru can turn 24/28mm into 35mm by digital zoom but not otherwise
ZJ24: I like the bravery of the choice (affordable ILC) and the photos. Is it just me or does the shot at ISO 6400 look pretty decent, especially for an APS-C sensor? - looking on an uncalibrated monitor, but I've seen a lot worse that high for a non-FF sensor. Enjoying these features.
My nex-5x, a 16MP Sony sensor has excellent high ISOsame sensor as X-A2
It works, I use many yearsHighly recommend