kecajkerugo

the OM-D, Nex-7 and even the K-30 are higher spec cameras therefore it is not surprise that the outcome from them will be better. This Nikon is yet another more refined enthusiast DSLR...for those...

trivial changes sell well...mass products ....more and more pixels, pink colors, 100 auto-focus sensors, yet another plastic body.
It is good to see some conservative companies like Fuji and to...

yes, that is possible...see my post below and test it yourself that way.

many people do not care about RAWs therefore for this community is perfect camera.
Many of you is dissapointed of the quality try to make a test then:
have somebody to swicth on different cameras...

Folks, anybody here making real pictures...I mean something else than brick wall for pixel fans? You are given one more great camera (as in many cases these days) but reading through comments one...

it is a good tool but non of the tools mentioned by many of you is noticeable better! They are quite similar under low ISO indeed....and for ISO on the 3200 level Nikon starting to lose slightly...

do you all here really have to look for a clear winner over the remaining brands?
Cannot you just accept that there are many great cameras in the world?
What the whole argument is about ? Pixel...

the sensor is from D7000..at least look like this: on the comparative chart swicth on the D7000 and see how they look like...same (almost same...depending on subjective evaluation).
Yet another...

tiny sensor of the E-M5? How much it is smaller? Bother to check?
If it will be better it will be just 1/3 stop better , no more. Meaningless for most but few guys. (except pixel p. company)

yet another great camera for a serious folks. Yet another reason to complain about for so may here on this (and others forums).
Is it better than OM-D? Is it better than X-E1? In some areas it is ,...

on the other hand the oly is a higher spec camera than the basic Nikon. Still the 24 m of the Nikon cannot rival 16 m of the oly.

some guys below said m43 is incomparable with APS-C cameras refering to some DP test shots of a recent Oly glass.
I am not sure what happened to those pictures but there are tons of test samples on...

a lot of negative attidude here ...as always.
Sounds like the big one CN enemy is here...
This little baby is one of the best recent cameras.
Again, look around and find what real photographers say...

assume you are using a calibrated high end monitor (like an EIZO) or just 150$ "high tech " from e.g samsung?

electronivc viewfinder can be small outside and cover 100% of the view and yet capable to show a preview with exposure.
The whole point here is the size and the preview capabilities.
And there is...

not alway need any raws (unless you really need pixsel peeping)
e.g. just compare to similar test done for OM=D

http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/03/09/olympus-omd-em5-iso-series

Not usable above...

up to ISo 6400 it keeps up with the OM-D...later on it takes lead ...not bad!
If it only was smaller...

it is even better- compare the size of the Fuji and the old boy Nikon

And the Fuji size is a fraction of that monster! So is OM-D from Oly (somewhat worse in high ISO but still great and small)