Fidel Castro

Fidel Castro

Joined on Mar 28, 2012

Comments

Total: 7, showing: 1 – 7
On 5D3_5659 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (3 comments in total)

Not too bad for a (almost) low-light situation but I don't understand why the shutter speed is 1/500 in this situation.

I'm overall disappointed by these samples and the choices of the photographers, especially for the setting when shooting.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 14, 2012 at 15:23 UTC as 1st comment
On G34C0080_ACRprocessed photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (5 comments in total)

Yeah, this photo sucks pretty much but it's obviously not because of the camera but because of the choice of the photographer and I'm pretty sure that it was taken from the hand which is not the best for 1/60 sec especially for trees because of the wind and shaking.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 14, 2012 at 15:17 UTC as 1st comment
On PT3C8609 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (4 comments in total)

This is outstanding performance even for much lower ISOs. And for 12,800 is really very very good, much better than most of other samples I've seen.

I don't know the huge difference in performance between the samples tho.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 14, 2012 at 15:09 UTC as 1st comment
On PT3C8920_ACRprocessed photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (15 comments in total)

If you'd shoot with a phone in this conditions your photo would either be black or completely blurry. (not to mention the noise)

This doesn't look so bad if you ask me. It's quite sharp so with some anti-noise 'dose' you would be able to get a very decent photo for such a high ISO like 12,800.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 14, 2012 at 15:00 UTC as 1st comment
On PT3C8770 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (6 comments in total)

Very good IQ for a ISO8,000 and f3.5.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 14, 2012 at 14:53 UTC as 2nd comment
On PT3C8767 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (5 comments in total)

For ISO1,600 the noise is great but the overall photo became too soft like somebody added a huge anti-noise dose to the photo.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 14, 2012 at 14:51 UTC as 1st comment
On PT3C8687_ACRprocessed photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (6 comments in total)

grainy concrete surface?

The photo is strongly noisy. You can check every detail like the face of the blond girl or anything else and you will notice a huge amount of noise like it's shot with ISO3,200 or more.

I won't say it's terrible but it's quite bad and disappointing.

I guess/hope that a mistake has been done when writing ISO100.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 14, 2012 at 14:48 UTC as 2nd comment | 1 reply
Total: 7, showing: 1 – 7