hiplnsdrftr

hiplnsdrftr

Lives in United States nyc, NY, United States
Works as a photographer
Joined on Jan 2, 2007
About me:

photographer, NYC

Comments

Total: 71, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On Just Posted: Fujifilm X-E1 hands-on preview article (277 comments in total)
In reply to:

Edmond Leung: The camera size is too big.
Looks nothing special when compared with NEX7.
Good but not outstanding.

I really, really planned on buying the Vex-7... until I handled one.
And then there was the lack of any compact black lens.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 6, 2012 at 18:15 UTC

In 27 years of buying cameras this is the first camera I have ever pre-ordered. Looks awesome.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 6, 2012 at 13:55 UTC as 21st comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

harrisoncac: Why this instead of NEX-7?

For one, I hate flip screens. The only lens that I considered for the NEX7, the 16mm is silver metal colored, looks horrible mounted to the all black NEX7.

NEX7 has some performance and size advantages, but not enough compared to this Fujifilm XE1.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 6, 2012 at 13:53 UTC
On Nikon CoolPix P7700 Preview preview (192 comments in total)

The "lacking viewfinder" gripe is almost as lame as the "gotta have flip screen" demand.

Much more important is the size of the sensor, and I'm not talking about megapixels.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 27, 2012 at 13:38 UTC as 52nd comment
On Canon EOS M Preview preview (557 comments in total)
In reply to:

allalin: I find this forum quite disturbing. Whilst there is a great deal of considered and well informed critique from the majority of contributors; the level of pure venom expressed by the dissenters frequently borders on the unhinged. If the best you can contribute is a comment to the effect that the camera is ugly, or some other equally inane pronouncement, then I fail to see what you hope to achieve here.

Given that this is a review website people are inevitably going to express their opinions. You might not like their opinions, but it is an integral part of this website.

A member complaining that a camera is ugly or that a camera is lacking an important feature is in many ways more productive than a member complaining that other members are complaining...

Direct link | Posted on Jul 28, 2012 at 20:58 UTC
In reply to:

Mach Schnell: No image stabilization, and no built-in flash? I don't understand. Why leave them out?

Very strange as NEX7, GX1, X1, X100 all have a built in flash... it keeps the camera small, is there if you need it.

I'm actually OK with the looks of the Canon M, I'm very happy about the lack of a gimmicky flip screen.

But the flashless design kills it for me.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 18:59 UTC
In reply to:

johnparas11zenfoliodotcom: no built in flash? :-(

Fuji X100, Leica X1, Sony Nex7 and Panasonic GX1 are all serious cameras, all have a built in flash. The point being, it keeps your large sensor compact camera... compact... and versatile.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 18:04 UTC

Would have considered it with a built in flash.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 04:44 UTC as 391st comment

Very eager to handle one!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 14:07 UTC as 42nd comment
In reply to:

wootpile: I don´t get it. A mega capable sensor in a point and shoot toy. Too bad. I've said it about some other cams too, but if they had added a true swivel flipscreen these cams would sell in droves.

Yes, you don't get... a flip screen on this camera would be ridiculous.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 14:06 UTC

Ansel Adam's zone system essentially created HDR photos.

There's HDR and then there's extreme HDR. Like any tool it can be abused, over used or used incorrectly.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2012 at 15:19 UTC as 18th comment

In the old days we burned and dodged. Conservative use of HDR techniques is essentially no different.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 3, 2012 at 22:49 UTC as 133rd comment | 2 replies
On Preview:canong1x (1032 comments in total)

wow, Canon actually found a way to make the ugly Panasonic GX1 look attractive...

Posted on Jan 11, 2012 at 16:07 UTC as 270th comment | 1 reply
On Preview: Canon PowerShot G1 X large sensor zoom compact article (776 comments in total)
In reply to:

raztec: The idiocy of Canon and Nikon shines again!!

Instead seeing what the m4/3 competition have done and being able to find just the right balance of lens and chip, they each royally screw up their new cameras.

Nikon, by making its chip way too small and reducing external controls. A slightly bigger chip, P A S M controls, and F-mount adapter would have sold me given its great auto focus.

And now Canon with a chip that's unnecessarily big and hence a lense that's unnecessarily slow and not wide enough. And no EVF and non-interchangeable lenses and crippled video functions are all huge oversights.

Why do they not realize that so many of us who are invested in their DSLR and lenses already wouldn't jump to Fuji or Panasonic if we got what we wanted from Nikon or Canon?

This marketing idiots at N and C continuously frustrate me.

exactly

Direct link | Posted on Jan 9, 2012 at 22:29 UTC
On Preview: Canon PowerShot G1 X large sensor zoom compact article (776 comments in total)

Was hoping for a slightly smaller, no flip-screen, no zoom, no gimmicks, with fast prime lens.

However, I do applaud Canon for finally releasing a big sensor compact.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 9, 2012 at 21:29 UTC as 112th comment | 2 replies
On Preview:canong1x (1032 comments in total)

Canon has actually made the large sensor-compact camera I have griped about... and it's butt ugly. Oh well... can't win 'em all.

Posted on Jan 9, 2012 at 19:44 UTC as 373rd comment | 6 replies
On Just posted: Our Sony NEX-7 in-depth review article (339 comments in total)
In reply to:

bajanexile: "OneGuy has not uploaded any photos to their gallery yet.". So many opinions from so many people, yet not a single image posted and this seems to be true for most of the people contributing to these posts. It would be interesting to see some images from you all. We might take your comments a bit more seriously. I value opinions from people who can actually take a half-decent picture. As it stands, this is open to debate. The way to overcome doubt is to supply proof. Any salesman will confirm this. Let's see some of your pictures on line.

Maybe the amazing review on this site threw me off?

I'm pretty sure the performance and results will be just fine.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 15, 2011 at 22:19 UTC
On Just posted: Our Sony NEX-7 in-depth review article (339 comments in total)

As a working professional fashion/documentary photographer I am really excited about the NEX-7.

The combination of it's size, sensor size and features is perfect for what I have been looking for. The only feature I could do with out is the flip screen.

Looking forward to using it in situations where the 1Ds3 is not really practical (too big or too conspicuous).

The NEX-7 along with some lens adapters should allow me to use some of my existing lens as well!

Only thing frustrating about it will be the long wait to get one...

This will be my first digital camera that will not be a Canon... they have blown it.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 15, 2011 at 18:17 UTC as 16th comment | 2 replies
On Just posted: Our Sony NEX-7 in-depth review article (339 comments in total)
In reply to:

Cy Cheze: Looks like a rich man's alternative to the a65, but with a perplexing menu structure and tinier ergonomics. True or false?

Are there any NEX7 owners fond of its menu system? Perhaps they learn to live with it, like certain intestinal or skin disorders, but is there any sane reason why Sony did not revamp the whole scheme? It's not as though the company's cameras always had convoluted menus.

I think the price is fair for what you supposedly get... so nothing "rich man's" about it.

Leica X1 at $2,000 might be more of a "rich man's" compact APS camera?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 15, 2011 at 18:09 UTC
On Just posted: Our Sony NEX-7 in-depth review article (339 comments in total)
In reply to:

miketala: It's odd to compare this with cameras that cost--at most--1/2 the price. I get that it's mirrorless, but with lenses it's simply not as compact as m43, and at least one of the adapters appears to be as large as the camera itself.

A comparison with a similarly priced camera using a similar sized sensor, e.g. the D7000, is highly warranted and it's simply silly and unprofessional that DPR failed to do this.

The Nex-7 with pancake is roughly the same size as a Canon G12, so would be fair to compare them if size was your main concern.

If price is your main concern then yeah, compare it to other $1200 cameras.

If your main concern is sensor size then yes, compare it to 7D and the likes.

The great thing about the Nex-7 for me is the successful combination of factors that are important to me.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 15, 2011 at 18:07 UTC
Total: 71, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »