techmine

techmine

Lives in United States Irving, United States
Joined on Apr 14, 2008

Comments

Total: 133, showing: 101 – 120
« First‹ Previous4567Next ›Last »
On article Fujifilm firmware attempts to fix X10 white discs (264 comments in total)
In reply to:

David Clarke29: Whatever, I shall keep the X10 - HOWEVER I find it totally beyond belief that a company the size of Fuji could let a sensor design fault as portayed by the X10 pass acceptance by their quality assurance department.

The whole thing smells of commercial expediency and marketing pressure. This particular camera suits my shooting requirements but personally I will never again believe the marketing hype issued by Fuji or/and their accolytes again. Needless to say, further Fuji purchase is a no no.

HowaboutRAW: I am speaking based on my experience as an "owner" of the camera. I bought it within days and it gave me the wow factor. I don't have ORB in any of my shots (may be I am not nitpicking them with a magnifier glass). That could be because the type of photos I take. People have gripes about S95 and LX5 too; especially with Video.

Link | Posted on Feb 10, 2012 at 04:02 UTC
On article Fujifilm firmware attempts to fix X10 white discs (264 comments in total)
In reply to:

David Clarke29: Whatever, I shall keep the X10 - HOWEVER I find it totally beyond belief that a company the size of Fuji could let a sensor design fault as portayed by the X10 pass acceptance by their quality assurance department.

The whole thing smells of commercial expediency and marketing pressure. This particular camera suits my shooting requirements but personally I will never again believe the marketing hype issued by Fuji or/and their accolytes again. Needless to say, further Fuji purchase is a no no.

Whatever, it is still an excellent "Point and Shoot" camera.

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2012 at 21:01 UTC
On article Pentax announces K-01 K-mount APS-C mirrorless camera (874 comments in total)
In reply to:

techmine: Design is not too bad but DPR gave us good sense of the size by comparing it with K5. I am disappointed that Pentax did not go the 'Q' design route which is more retro. It would have fit right into the trend of "cool" retro looking cameras with APS-C sensor. Its more of a Ricoh design than a Pentax one.

Nevertheless, its a step in the right direction - Smaller physical size overall (body + new lenses) with excellent IQ. Alright there is a new kid on the block , now bring on the sample photos... :-)

Right, I just mentioned that it kinda gives you an idea. APS-C sensor Mirrorless cameras are a little bigger anyways.

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2012 at 18:12 UTC
On article Pentax announces K-01 K-mount APS-C mirrorless camera (874 comments in total)

Design is not too bad but DPR gave us good sense of the size by comparing it with K5. I am disappointed that Pentax did not go the 'Q' design route which is more retro. It would have fit right into the trend of "cool" retro looking cameras with APS-C sensor. Its more of a Ricoh design than a Pentax one.

Nevertheless, its a step in the right direction - Smaller physical size overall (body + new lenses) with excellent IQ. Alright there is a new kid on the block , now bring on the sample photos... :-)

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2012 at 16:16 UTC as 253rd comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

bb hk: Should they be using lens shift type VR?

Agree, the VR on P300 is astonishing. Really love my hand held shots. Blows my fujix10 and E-PL1 out of the water.

Link | Posted on Feb 1, 2012 at 19:21 UTC
In reply to:

techmine: P310 needed RAW support and possibly a GPS chip. That had been the main feedback from P300 users. You pick any review or user forums, the demand was clear. Yet Nikon came back with the same spec'ed camera (same lens and sensor). Simply beyond my understanding. Oh well Nikon wants to stay in 3.5 - 4 star category with their coolpix lineup, so be it. They don't want to compete with top performers from Canon/Fuji/Panasonic. Wonder why?

Yeah I agree but they (nikon) do that so much so that their whole coolpix lineup never gets the attention from enthusiasts. They must be selling a lot of these world wide to justify producing under achievers.

Link | Posted on Feb 1, 2012 at 19:17 UTC

P510 on the other hand is the right step for that category of a camera. A longer zoom range with GPS can lure a lot of tourists and bird watchers. 42x is certainly power packed....

Link | Posted on Feb 1, 2012 at 05:51 UTC as 43rd comment

P310 needed RAW support and possibly a GPS chip. That had been the main feedback from P300 users. You pick any review or user forums, the demand was clear. Yet Nikon came back with the same spec'ed camera (same lens and sensor). Simply beyond my understanding. Oh well Nikon wants to stay in 3.5 - 4 star category with their coolpix lineup, so be it. They don't want to compete with top performers from Canon/Fuji/Panasonic. Wonder why?

Link | Posted on Feb 1, 2012 at 05:44 UTC as 46th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Cipher: $500 for the T200V? Is Sony serious?

GPS premium? :-)

Link | Posted on Jan 30, 2012 at 19:55 UTC

Didn't understand the burst shooting specs. Continuous drive is listed as 1 fps. Really? 1 fps?

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2012 at 13:06 UTC as 33rd comment
On article Just Posted: Nikon 1 V1 and J1 review (442 comments in total)

I would just compare the path 2 giants - Sony and Nikon have taken with regards to their MILC systems. You have to put traditional DSLR into context. On one hand Nikon produces amazing DSLR and lenses (ALL RANGES) but now builds this ever compromising 1 system. On the other hand Sony's DSLR offering is not widely accepted but (purely to gain market and beat the leaders) they are doing wonders to their MILC systems. APS-C sensors, excellent view finders, gorgeous screens, new fast lenses. With what I have seen, people never bashed NEX series cameras so bad when they came out. Not just because they knew that NEX was great but the "potential" the system had.

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2012 at 00:55 UTC as 107th comment | 3 replies
On photo ISO_12800 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (34 comments in total)

Oh my God!

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2012 at 04:57 UTC as 18th comment
On a photo in the Canon PowerShot G1 X Preview Samples sample gallery (34 comments in total)

Oh my God!

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2012 at 04:57 UTC as 18th comment

This is 1 camera, I am really waiting to be reviewed. It is promising for sure. If I am not wrong, this is first of its kind (large sensor, compact'ish body and fixed zoom lens). There is always a trade off between making a camera this small with larger sensor and putting a fast zoom lens f2.0-2.8 (like Fuji X10).

Having said that, if it provides truly APS-C like IQ and fast enough Auto focus, I am buying it.

Link | Posted on Jan 13, 2012 at 20:33 UTC as 89th comment | 1 reply
On article Nikon D4 overview (840 comments in total)
In reply to:

techmine: Never understood the stealth nature of these camera announcements. There is nothing innovative here but just improvements over earlier models. It might still be a good camera but who would steal the exterior design of Nikon :-)

Don't they already look like brothers? :-)

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2012 at 20:02 UTC
On article Nikon D4 overview (840 comments in total)

Never understood the stealth nature of these camera announcements. There is nothing innovative here but just improvements over earlier models. It might still be a good camera but who would steal the exterior design of Nikon :-)

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2012 at 14:20 UTC as 187th comment | 2 replies
On article Introduction to Documentary-style People Photography (66 comments in total)

In the first approach you mentioned that you would manually focus. It's hard for me to understand how and why focus is manual? Especially when you are not composing through viewfinder. Won't you run the risk of getting slightly out of focus pics? I would just point the camera at the subject and let auto focus do the job. Am I missing something?

Link | Posted on Dec 24, 2011 at 19:02 UTC as 23rd comment | 2 replies
On article Buyer's Guide: Enthusiast raw-shooting compact cameras (286 comments in total)

I agree with the reviewer - IQ is best in X10 and Canon G12(looking at the sample galleries of all). X10 even better in situations where you have to just turn the dial to EXR mode.
PS: I own X10 and I felt that wow factor when I compared out of camera shots from my previous compact cameras including SX10IS, P300, Oly- E-PL1. Long time ago I had a Sony 1/1.7" CCD W series P&S and those images were just brilliant. Sadly there is no Sony here to compare. All they are thinking about is, NEX.

Link | Posted on Dec 16, 2011 at 20:54 UTC as 50th comment
On article Buyer's Guide: Enthusiast raw-shooting compact cameras (286 comments in total)
In reply to:

tem00: Regarding DR, if you shoot the p7100 with "Active" D-Lighting, in RAW, and develop with Nikon's Capture NX2, you will see a tremendous benefit, perhaps equaling or exceeding Fuji's EXR. I only have a F600EXR, and love it, but I do have a p7000. I have been on the fence about buying x10 for EXR, and after experimenting with the P7000 D-lighting (you turn on Active prior, you cannot activate it after you made the shot) and NX2, I don't see much need.

BTW
If you shoot Nikon RAW, you really need to use NX2. After you learn the features, it will blow you away. All of your edits, versions of edits, and control points, saved in the RAW file without a database, and available for later work is awesome. D-lighting control, from camera settings menu in NX2 allows for very natural DR boost. If you don't like the look, you can always turn it off, but it must be enabled at shot time for the option later. Confusing I know. Also, if you use NX2, try the presentation mode.

Totally agree on your NX2 points. That thing is made for NEF. I loved it while I was using the trial version. Didn't buy it because I think the next version is around the corner.

Link | Posted on Dec 16, 2011 at 19:25 UTC
On article Buyer's Guide: Enthusiast raw-shooting compact cameras (286 comments in total)
In reply to:

dark goob: The Olympus PEN Mini is $449 right now. Why on Earth would anyone buy one of these tiny sensor cameras over an intechangeable lens model that costs less, has a much larger sensor, supports wireless flash control, 7-frame bracketing, etc., and is much faster?

I'll put the PEN Mini RAW files against any of these things, any time...

And again, you would have to figure out which lens to pick for what occasion. Granted 1 lens approach of all these cameras is not perfect but that is what they are for. I have an E-PL1+kit and X10 beats it all (and I mean all) departments.

Link | Posted on Dec 16, 2011 at 19:22 UTC
Total: 133, showing: 101 – 120
« First‹ Previous4567Next ›Last »