ottonis: @ all the dudes here complaining about sample pictures being "uninspired" or in whatever else way "not good enough" to their standards:.Apparently, you guys forget that this was NOT a professional fashion shooting, where ONE photographer was shooting ONE model thousands of times over several hours, just to pick the best 5 pictures from perhaps 500+. Not to mention lack of control over lighting, model acting/posing etc.Moreover, you guys conveniently forget that the reviewers here were given equipment they never before had in their hands (entirely new lenses and to some of them possibly even the cameras) without any chance to get accustomed to the new tech. Tell me ONE professional photographer who gets entirely NEW gear, gets out, takes 20 shots and all them are masterpieces? In what delusional world are you living, or are you just hating for no reason?
And I always thought that fanboy-ism was constrained to the guys < 16 years of age.....
you said it right, thank you
what id like to see in 500px is a full-screen image viewer, like almost the rest, with this high quality algorithm that they've got in image decode ... still its one of the best sites to me
i like it , its really bigger and better detailed ... itll show up thetiny details of the newer higher resolution beasts
hope it is more evolved than the last search engine founded on the site ...
@ Baxter Bad, so true man, its really ridiculous those scenes things in all compacts and now in mirrorless cams ...
good news to all DPR followers/readers
come on guys , am i reading well enough these days ? how the hell can i know if someone on this planet took a photo of that place or that thing or whatever it is, should i search the whole net to know if this photo has been taken by else, and if yes, should i stop taking it and do something else, and start to worry about law's and copyright things ... come on guys ... what world we're living for ... geees.