Sirandar: I am fairly impressed with this camera, and if I hadn't bought an EM5 I would probably get one.
The dynamic range and low light performance isn't nearly as good and the FZ1000 seems pretty noisy above 800
To never have to change a lens actually outweighs both these cons for everyday practical use.
From my experience with the Pana FZ30, I found that the lack of dynamic range and telephoto end that was too slow to be useful are the only reason I am stilll not using it, megapixels be damned.
The dynamic range on the FZ1000 isn't bad .... may not be a limitation.
I have a suspicion that the telephoto end of the FZ1000 and may be still to slow to capture great pics in anything but the brightest light. That and the noise at high ISO, may limit this camera at the long end.
The 5 axis stabilization on the EM5 has trouble getting truly sharp images at the long end of my 40-150 Oly lens and looking at the magnified live view in manual focus shows why .... there is a terrible amount of shake at 150.
I would also guess that stabilization will also struggle on the long end of the FZ1000, perhaps even in good light. The image won't be terrible, but looking at 1:1 you will see ghosting that makes the overall image fuzzy.
I wish Pana made this camera with a shorter zoom but a wider aperture. I have a feeling that the zoom range in anything other than bright light would be better if cropping is considered. Maybe not.
I wonder why Pana didn't make this camera more weatherproof as there is less to seal. It would make an awesome bush camera.
I am fairly impressed with this camera, and if I hadn't bought an EM5 I would probably get one.
New been a fan of noisy drones but these pictures offer a unique perspective.
I notice that the 2nd picture taken in Manilla, the bicycles the young boys are riding seem to be of much higher quality than seen in Canada, if they are representative.
The average bike ridden by children and many adults are just thrown together piles of junk bought at Canadian Tire or the like.
backayonder: I don't have CC as I only have limited broadband bandwidth per month so will continue to use Lightroom and Cs5 as a photographer I don't need anything else ie upgrades to Photoshop.
I guess by moving to the cloud Adobe have cut down on pirated software?
Oh how wrong you are ..... Downloading an executable is very handy. You just download the file wherever you can find good internet (work, friends house ...) and then copy to a flash drive and install on your internet challenged computer at you leisure.
Try that with Steam or other similar service .... you have to move your whole computer to a internet location.
And as for updating only the changed parts of LR in a small update. That has been the source of a million bad user experiences where you need to wipe the program with special software or reinstall Windows.
I have 6GB of mobile internet only and tether my home PC.
I love how LR is updated.
40daystogo: Why would anyone choose to get either the Lumix FZ1000 or the Sony RX10 - both of which only have 1" sensors - when Sony's A6000 with 18-200mm lens cost roughly the same as the RX10 (admittedly before the discount), and which has a larger APS-C lens, with the A6000 combo weighing less than the RX10?
Never having to change lenses is a big plus if you are shooting a lot.
You like changing lenses in the winter with gloves on? You like searching though your bag when the photo op is passing?
Pana should have made this camera weather sealed.
Stunning work with loving care .....
This little piece of current events so illustrates that camera pricing has very little for do with manufacture costs.
Did the cost to make a Sony RX10 drop 300$ overnight? The price of a camera is what the market will bear.... until you get close to the bottom.
Sirandar: Interesting .... but no microSD and a 100$ whallop for 64GB
I am well and truly sick of Android and all it's battery mayhem. It seems Android has become a buggy mess. If FireOS was written from the ground up to actually manage your privacy and battery life this phone may actually survive.
Android seems totally incapable of preventing apps from constantly waking up phone even when it is locked in your pocket. Better Battery Stats helps but often doesn't because Android isn't really set up to identify what is actually waking your phone = deleted wakelocks and wakelocks you can't control
Once a month I am troubleshooting because my phone can't make it through the day in my pocket unused because of some update, issue or other. I don't even load new apps anymore because it is just too much trouble. Sometimes it is Google apps at fault, the Play Store for one. Try forgetting to manually kill that task and see what happens.
Post Post note ...... 2 full days of battery life ... and the only thing I did was use Tasker to force the phone to only have Location Services "on" when I want it.
I wouldn't even dream, of complaining if Android actually allowed you to easily Identify what app or system process was waking your phone constantly ..... I would simply delete any app and blacklist the developer ....
But you can't do that because more often than not there is no way to figure our which app is the problem and often it is Google's own apps.
Post Note: After suffering through the small pain of rooting my S3 (Knox made it harder than it should have been) and installing 3 utilities Tasker, Superuser and Secure Settings ........ I can finally stop my phone from spending 50% awake.
All it took was only allowing location services ON when I wanted on.
And No I am not Factory resetting my phone every month.
What an embarrassment to Google and their Android model. When the phone is locked and in your pocket, there is no excuse for more than 10% awake time.
To Lars .... Many people Android using android phones have this issue .... battery management is one of Androids biggest shortcomings. Some think that location services must be disabled to get decent battery life.
How easy is it for an end user to only have Location services on when they use Maps. Except for remembering to manually toggle, there is no way.
I finally broke down and rooted my phone .... now I can use tasker to finally shut down all that crap in the background.
There is no excuse whatsoever except very sloppy OS management for a phone not to last 2 days when you don't use it. Android is doning way too much in the background that a un-rooted end user has no control of.
To Lars ..... About once a month I get a situation where some app or Android process gets stuck in some kind of loop and my S3 won't sleep, even when locked.
Yesterdays mayhem was related to fast dormancy and the wakelock ril-fd. The one before that was the play store. The one before that was related to syncing my Google account and only deleting my account from the phone fixed that.
It is like a full time job keeping Android running
Interesting .... but no microSD and a 100$ whallop for 64GB
Thank you Sony and Pana for making cameras like this again.
I used a FZ30 for years longer than I should have just because it was such a great camera in good light. It's dynamic range and low light capabilities left much to be desired though.
If the Pana engineers can deliver a competitive dynamic range compared to M4/3 this camera will be a very powerful and versatile tool.
From the test images on DPreview it looks like the high ISO performance is only adequate, but this offset by not having to change lenses, which is huge IMO. It looks usable up to ISO1600 which allows some indoor photography without a flash.
I am a little puzzled why they didn't make it at least splash resistant as it seems it would be easier for this type of camera.
A simple but groundbreaking idea .......
I think the pictures are beautiful and more than a little creepy
At last a successor to the FZ30/50
It has no where near as good high ISO performance as an OMD E5 ....
But to never have to change lenses again ...... what a dream
I can't really tell how good the effect is ..... but it will all come down the quality of the masking and edge detection .....
Actually at the resolution shown the effect isn't that bad ....
Still, this camera doesn't make all that much sense. The effect tweaked a little would be good for macro shooting to choose the best focused picture maybe.
In good light this camera takes very pleasing and detailed pictures. If I didn't have a M4/3 and wasn't worried about ISO1600+ I would buy ..
What a picture ......
Lovely pictures with that certain something....
Interesting that an engraver could afford a nice vehicle at that time. There must be more to the story....