-
Detail, lots and lots of detail. Big pictures with more detail than you can shake a stick at.
It helps if the subject, well, has lots of details.
-
The irony here is palpable (to see a comment like that coming from a former colony).
-
I find the screen to be a great advantage. For example, one time I wanted to keep the subject in the middle of my frame, but didn't want a lightbulb in the background, so I raised my camera above...
-
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-05-29/the-surprising-global-shortage-in-skilled-workersAs far as cameras go, I'm starting to think it would be a good idea for Canikon to pair up with some...
-
Maybe they haven't updated the 400/5.6 because nothing made in the last 20 years does a better job (for less than $2K).
-
The information frenzy isn't inherently worthless, if something is actually a terrible product we will know about it quickly after it's released, where in the pre-internet days it would have taken...
-
Look into the Sigma 35mm f1.4.You may still like a fast lens with less than great IQ though. I came to a realization about IQ the other day and I think it applies to your situation as well.My...
-
I'm pretty sure I've seen the term "ISO sensitivity" thrown around. I think using "sensitivity" as a key word portrays the function best. You can combine it with "exposure", "ISO", "brightness",...
-
It seems reasonable to me that someone spending $12,000 on a lens might want to put in another 20% and get something superior to what is already available.
-
I bought an Induro AT413. It's big, heavy, has reasonable fit and finish, is decently well thought out, and it cost just over $200.The only point that I really disagree with on the AT413 is a...
-
I agree that you are far better off without a converter if they make an EF-M native lens in the range you're looking for. An EF-M 600mm f4 (and an EOS-M camera that doesn't suck) would make the...
-
I agree that you are far better off without a converter if they make a mirrorless native lens in the range you're looking for. An EF-M 600mm f4 (and an EOS-M camera that doesn't suck) would make...
-
Mirrorless cameras now have a reason to exist. APS-C is cheap compared to full frame, but gives up clarity and light from the smaller sensor. If Canon were to put one of these on a EOS-M that...
-
Thanks for the responses.So the answer to the first question basically is, the 18-55 IS is a better than average kit lens, but that is also an increasingly common attribute in more recent kit...
-
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3358224You're not the only one who thinks it's a good idea.
-
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/new/https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/adblock-plus/
-
And I guess I can only edit twice...Second try.40mm/5.6 41mm/5.641mm/6.3 55mm/5.6
-
So I got this 18-55 IS 2 lens with my camera (the T3 doesn't have a body only option), and everything I read says it should be a terrible lens.The problem is that in my testing it's hard to see...
-
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Publications/DxOMark-Insights/F-stop-bluesThe part about pixel size influencing the effect seems hard to be sure of as well. In the first graph you have poor...
-
Surely if someone can't see the EVF from close up they wouldn't be able to read either.Have you tried with glasses on?
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
|
| Total messages |
29 |
| Threads started |
1 |
| Last post |
4 weeks ago |
|