Shamael: 2750$ for the body, for a camera that has nothing to realy offer else than the look. Nikon will never learn. So, good luck with that.
don't worry, the fanboys are already making a line for it!
EVEN ignoring no f ring!!!
yep: pay more for less!!!
wombat661: "as they get older, get married and have babies I expect they will probably want to buy a better camera."
If you want to cater to the new parents crowd, then that better camera would not be a mirrorless. Babies moves very fast you need all the help you can get to get those candid shots. SLR with good focus tracking is very helpful here.New parents thinks their babies will sit still for them to adjust the camera. The optimal window to get the right shot with the right expression is about half a second.Told my in law to get a camera with fast focus. They looked at me like I was nuts. They though babies are so small they do not ever move. A month latter, they told me how frustrated they were with slow focus. Went out and got a SLR.
so, itdoes it better! :)
Plastek: "what will happen if customers start to lose interest" - yea. What if Hype for mirrorless fades out? Sony would be really screwed. But not even nearly as much as Olympus.
same sensor in basically same camera... when will we see the reviews of so many cameras we are waiting for months???
$3,000 for body only for a camera that does less then the others?!? o_O
Mirrorless Crusader: Great photo but you should have flipped it horizontally. The human eye moves naturally from left to right, which is the opposite direction this photo is leading us.
Not The human eye: The eye of those who read from left to rigth!!! And rules are made to be broken!!!Nice photo!
rtogog: This lens is excellent for sure! It is "small" but not pancake style. It will be good additional lens for building a system for Lumix G series, but not for Lumix DMC-GM1. She needs dedicated smaller lens to make it more proportional against its tiny & sexy body. Still salute for Panasonic to keep update their lenses lines.
were do u see the price?
ZhanMInG12: Hooray for all the screwed D600 owners!
Remember when Leica M240s were smashing to the ground because of loose strap lugs? Every camera that got damaged earned a free trip to Solmes, a full CLA and updated warranty. In most countries people received replacement cameras to use during the wait period. Learn something Nikon?
Really nice from Fuji!!! :D
chuirox: The real story here is that little paragraph about access to source code. They got the Acrobat source code, and if you think Acrobat was a dangerous vector before, wait a month or two. PDFs are going to be so toxic that no company in their right mind will be running Acrobat. If ever there was a time for FoxIt, Nuance, or some other PDF software, it's now.
Nice! Deserved a betterplace! :D
Photato: Phones outwitting Cameras in their own turf.How pathetic.
Its called "omitting caractheristics that the camera already can do by hardware(!) on purpose so you might had them in future models"
In that regard, the guys at Magic Lantern really REALLY deserve a huge amard for their amazing work!!!
They are better then canon in using their own sensors!!! Even dpreview recognised it!
EssexAsh: or "why cant dpreview stop posting iPhone articles."
VERY well said mapgraphs!!!
Artistico: It's better than the performance of many a compact camera. An iPhone truly eliminates the need for a low-end compact for snapshots, and I do believe that at times, you can get a shot with an iPhone that you simply couldn't with a bigger camera, either because it's always with you, or because it's unintrusive and doesn't cause a change in your subject's behaviour before you get the picture, as particularly large cameras with big lenses do have a tendency to do at times.
It might just be my next phone. I just have to wear out, lose or accidentally break my current one first...
Point very well made Marty! I do miss to find the complete reviews of a new DSLR here BEFORE seeing it in other sites! Now is the contrary! :/
It is a pity that we can't compare them with the cameras tests!!! I find it would be VERY interesting and informative!!!I wonder why Dpreview excluded that possibility?!? :(Even if we would have to press an extra click to open that possibility!!!
Looleylaylow: Cheese. But I'm sure there's a prog rock album cover awaiting discovery somewhere in her collection.
humm, that is really interesting! so much for originality!I wish u could post a photo or link of it! :)
Absolutic: great job guys as usual, lets see how many of the older cameras you can find to reshoot this. By the way how does it work, you guys at dpreview have a museum of every camera made in the last 10 years? Is there a closet with every camera and every charger? Or you borrow older cameras from friends and family members here and in England to reshoot these?
and that could be also VERY, VERY good to see also what happens to the sensor in time!!! :)
BonsaiZG: What if I do not have a lens with a 2.8???
there are many other ways to get small DOF! :)
created in PC
It would be VERY helpful if someone would make a good article about how to protect our images and privacy for REAL in facebook!
When will someone create something that allows us to connect with ppl in fakebook but not posting actually nothing in it, just having links that automatically would link our friends to it?That could be a solution!