Rick Knepper: It took a totalitarian country like China to do what every other country on the planet should have done, stood up for their citizens' consumer rights.
Correction: it "ONLY" took a...Next time nikon releases such a insult to his buyers it will take an ONU ban for they to admit ANY DIRT in one of their cameras!
Higuel: Us only? Indeed Ricoh, such a pity!!! :/
PS: not sure if more then 50% of dpreview(or POSTview as someone might call it lately!) are Us living, in wich case they might as well save the time to more important info!
Us only? Indeed Ricoh, such a pity!!! :/
TomasJacko: Amazingly interesting item reviewed, thank you, but:
It seems to have slipped your mind, today again, to put online your - I'm certain long ready - review of Canon 1DX.
Such absent-mindedness must be annoying also in ordinary life, am I not right?
Really, do think of it tomorrow, ok? It's just one click..
BAUTIFULLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 :DTHANKS FOR THE LAUGH!!!! :D"and Sony memory stick cards etc"LOL!!!
Gesture: Real photographers = no wrist or neck straps; no camera cases; no lens caps; no UV filters. And I am serious.
BRILLIANT Ben Ramsey!!! :D
samfan: I pity anyone who uses the original strap that came with the camera and doesn't know better. Those straps prove the camera manufacturers have just contempt for their users. So uncomfortable they might as well be made of chains and poison ivy, but of course, with a huge colorful logo or several.
ignore the trolls Samfan! :D
Hossein Zaka: Hello Pentax(or Ricoh ) Co.
Why you don’t improve low light capability or color depth or Dynamic range in this 24Mpix sensor!? I though you known that I don’t need 24Mpix or more and 16or12Mpix enough for me. Because I don’t want to print on a billboard or other big walls, and I don’t have giant disk and space to archive that.I just want to rock with my APS-C sensor and have better low light capability or Dynamic range than K5II/K5IIs or D7100/D7000
I think this time DPR dont give you more than a Silver Award! Regars
AND DONT FORGET TO WRITTE THE EXACT SAME COMENT IN nikon and sony cameras!!! :D
RedFox88: All 4 cameras compare equally in RAW. Glad you waited and whined for months, ricohians?
dont worry with him: trolls JUST WANNA TROL!!! ;)
bluevellet: Many Pentaxians have been ruining other camera reviews with their inane whining about the missing K3 review. Well, they now have their purchase validation (sort of), it's only fair to ruin their precious K3 review in return.
"DPReview, why the K3 review when the Nikon D4 has never been properly reviewed? Nikon even had time to release the D4s in the meantime. Insane."
"One of the sharpest lenses ever and DPR is content with just a preview. Get that Zuiko 75mm review out already!"
Come on folks, channel your inner Pentaxian and whine like there's no tomorrow.
PS: and i did READ your post! :)
@bluevelvet, sorryblue, there is just no way you can speak ur way out in TRUE&just logic.FIRST let me assure you i have only dslr form Canon! So that you don't get me into the spiral of hate-love-thisbrand-thatbrand! TIME IS WAY TOO SHORT TO WASTE MY LIFE ON THAT!!!HOWEVER, i DO FELL like Pentax makes some of the very best equipment out there for the last years and they SIMPLY DONT GET THE ATTENTION THEY DESERVE!THAT IS A FACT!NOT A BRAND PREFERENCE OF MINE!JUST, AND SIMPLY that:A fact.
So, after remembering the FACT, all of the hatters-lovers can go around in circles like CRAZY without letting ANY FACT ruining their PREFERENCES AND/OR OPINIONS!!! :D
Really helpfull for those interested!!!Not just some dubious and frustrating self promotion like is mostly the case in previous examples of articles!
THANKS and keep them coming whith this quality! :D
Jogger: £549.99 = DOA
I like that they make then available! and that they are GOOD overall in every way, but just like canon and nikon, many of the others try to ALSO go crazy with the prices! I still remenber when you didn't have to pay a fortune to get a decent f1.4 lens!!! :LAnd please nobody say nothing about the advantage of weather resistant new lenses because as Roger Cicala said: it is pretty much a bad joke on the part of every manufacturer!!! But they still MAKE YOU PAY FOR IT!!! 4TAPE THAT IS!sick!
Kivivuori: Some interesting models/prototypes...
The rest: nothing positive to say. Ugly, low-level design.... :(
BEAUTIFULLLLLLLLLLLL RichRMA!!!! :D
Cal22: The Pixpro S-1 is for the 4/3-system, they say, and that's an information on sensor size. We may assume, that the camera has the same lens mount Olympus and Panasonic use - but may we be certain?
and so, they MUST cover the sensor full size!!! X)
Marty4650: I think we should remember that the Kodak "legacy" isn't for making high end cameras.
Their legacy was always "cameras for the masses" like the Brownies, 126 and 110 Instamatics, Disc cameras, etc. While they did occasional produce a high end camera, their main goal was make photography easy and affordable. So these Kodak branded cheapies might fit right in.
These are probably aimed at emerging third world markets.
i do mostly agree with you Marty!However Kodak also made most of the best FF 35mm sensors in the planet, and... also some of the best and most famous MEDIUM FORMAT ONES! And i am sure you will not call those "easy and affordable", will you? ;)
Have a very good weekend!
bobbarber: 1) Does the government of Hungary feel this way about surveillance photos they take, or do they not take surveillance photos?
2) I received some attitude like this when I was taking photos in South America. My wife is South American, and I visit often. The narrative goes something like this: "You are a gringo, and taking photos of people (and the ornate interiors of churches, etc.) to sell for millions of dollars in a National Geographic spread." The narrative is believable to them, because they have heard it from their parents, beloved leftist professors, etc. In my case (and I suspect in most people's cases), the narrative was completely false.
I do agree that there is room for concern here, especially when photos may be used for publication. For personal use, I don't see the point. Also, I wonder about the politics here. It took me many years (decades) to realize that the governments in non-U.S. countries (I default to romanticizing them) can be as corrupt as they come (or not).
Neo... you are forgeting the most obvious: he was NOT in HIS COUNTRY!!! So ur coment does not aplly at all when you say "in mine i can..."!
if i go to yours it can be WAY WORST!!!In fact in your country that even use the EXACT SAME EXPRESSION TO GET THE MONEY FROM ANY TOURIST: GRINGO! EVEN if it is a Portuguese speaking the same language!!!!!
E eu sou Portugues!!! Mas kem ker chama-me LOGO de Gringo! "I gringo e' pra rouba!" como me ensinou um Amigo dai! :/
Retzius: Meanwhile, in China, a 14 year old makes iPhones for $4.00 a day.
NO ryansholl! YOU buy it!!!NOT ME!NOT MANY OTHERS!!!keep on saying you couldn't do nothing about it!!!
Xentinus: Interesting timing.I would like to know Sigma's investments in China.But still no matter what,Nikon deserved that.It is/was a SCANDAL!
you can read ALL about it in this site Xentinus!!!
NDaniel: Now Nikon got the bite, after their "stupid" act to ignore "dust" problem on their sensor, now they got hit in one of the most potential market worldwide,
shame on you Nikon, after countless complain and still putting deaf ear to all victim, maybe now you learn something, but still maybe...
Canon did the same with the autofocus of their professional DSLR sports camera less then 5years ago!
BOTH of them deserve severe punishment for this xity behaviour, but unfortunately the fan boys out there and the average consumer still don't apply it with their wallets!However, there is hope with Fuji and the likes coming in the game! :D
PS: just so the hatters relax: i have canon!
yabokkie: Chinese government responded too late, after D610. they are slower than Nikon and DPReview.
HAHAHA! THANKS for the laugh yabokkie!!! :D