RoelHendrickx

RoelHendrickx

Lives in Belgium Belgium
Has a website at www.roelh.zenfolio.com
Joined on Aug 13, 2007

Comments

Total: 132, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

RoelHendrickx: While visiting the SW I shot with my regular camera.
I recognize most of the places here.
However, I also used my Iphone to shoot, process and upload first sample images while on the road (think: "look, family, we are now here...").
Those images are numbers 26-65 in this gallery:
http://roelh.zenfolio.com/p402011222
Real final photos elsewhere on my pages.

Thank you Stu

Direct link | Posted on Aug 30, 2013 at 12:09 UTC

While visiting the SW I shot with my regular camera.
I recognize most of the places here.
However, I also used my Iphone to shoot, process and upload first sample images while on the road (think: "look, family, we are now here...").
Those images are numbers 26-65 in this gallery:
http://roelh.zenfolio.com/p402011222
Real final photos elsewhere on my pages.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 30, 2013 at 04:13 UTC as 48th comment | 2 replies
On photo No - You listen to me !!! in the Defiance challenge (7 comments in total)

That guy seems to have almost the same expression on many occasions.
I had an instant flashback to a few years ago.
Look here (images 12-22):
http://roelh.zenfolio.com/p490274999
Good shot you got there (especially the angle)

Direct link | Posted on Aug 26, 2013 at 16:35 UTC as 5th comment
On Connect post Instagram cracks down use of its brand name (12 comments in total)

I don't see how regulations issued today, can prohibit a certain custom or use that predeces it, unless those regulations are just a repetition of general law.
But in that case, Instagram should not include it now to try and crack down on use they seem to have tolerated and encouraged before.
Adding it to corporate regulations seems to be a message that "there is no more Mr. Nice Guy" (from now on), which is kind of an admission, that previously much more was tolerated.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2013 at 18:47 UTC as 9th comment
On Connect post Connected cameras of the future: Crossover solutions (25 comments in total)
In reply to:

jcmarfilph: none of the above..
Those silly ideas of attaching lens to a mediocre camera phone with sensor smaller than a pinhead are worthless.

Also, attaching a lens bigger than a phone itself defeats the purpose of mobility.

I'd rather see more travelzoom or bridge cam with WIFI or 4G capabilities than make my self look like a dork with a slippery brick in one hand and another hand holding the lens.

It's not often that I agree totally with an opinion on these comments.
But I do now. All of this (except for a real camera but with connectivity) looks just silly.
And there is no way that it will yield GOOD results.
"Interesting" (as in "weird"): yes maybe. But GOOD, no.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2013 at 18:42 UTC
On article Hand-painted Olympus E-P5 comes with bonus... Vespa? (51 comments in total)

Next up: buy a Leica, get a Rolls-Royce bundled for free!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 10, 2013 at 15:12 UTC as 7th comment
On Connect post How to turn your smartphone into an SLR adapter (17 comments in total)

and the point is?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 5, 2013 at 18:54 UTC as 7th comment | 2 replies
On Connect post Exposure: Gianpiero Riva (9 comments in total)

I like his photography.
Good, simple concepts and well executed.
No overdone PP but just enough.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 29, 2013 at 06:32 UTC as 4th comment | 1 reply
On Connect post Truly 'moving' images (15 comments in total)
In reply to:

maikD: Check my 3D gif:
http://www.maikid.com/home/2012/03/09/usa4d/

Now THAT is FAR more interesting!!

Direct link | Posted on Jun 18, 2013 at 04:21 UTC
On Connect post Tintype takes your mobile photography back in time (4 comments in total)

That video was interesting.
The app is more of the same.
(But I must admit that Koloid is corny fun.)

Direct link | Posted on Jun 14, 2013 at 17:35 UTC as 4th comment
On article Forum updates (68 comments in total)

photo sharing (and commenting) made easier is a great thing if it works well

Direct link | Posted on Jun 13, 2013 at 06:30 UTC as 38th comment
On Connect post Truly 'moving' images (15 comments in total)

That first is mildly interesting, but the animation is necessary to make the image interesting...
That second just makes me dizzy. Help, I want to get off this ride!!

Direct link | Posted on Jun 12, 2013 at 15:18 UTC as 19th comment
On article Classic lines when clients want you to work for free (141 comments in total)
In reply to:

jm67: From the viewpoint of a wedding photographer...
Yes I know it doesn't quite fit all five but #s two and four do so frequently.

'It will mean great exposure for you.'
--No, it won't. I'm on the wrong side of the camera to be exposed.
'If you don't want to do it for free, I know other photographers who will.'
--Then why are you asking me?
'We could just find a stock photo if you're not interested.'
--I can recommend a few companies if you'd like to save time.
'My cousin has a DSLR and I think I can get him to do it if you don't want to.
(My personal favourite, the cousin, aunt, uncle and I get this alot),
--You'll cry when you see the results so I recommend hydrating first.
'If all goes well, it could lead to paid opportunities with our company.'
--I love betting on "maybes" and "ifs". Sign me up. I mean, pass.

For a wedding photographer, the last one would me:
"I'm sure to divorce at some point and then maybe I'll pay you to shoot my next wedding."

Direct link | Posted on Jun 7, 2013 at 21:01 UTC
On article Classic lines when clients want you to work for free (141 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ventil: My favorite, although not a quote asking images for free:

"Wow, great cameras, sure they have to take good pictures!"
-- "Yes, of course, we've taught them everything we know..."

People seldom talk to a painter like this:
"Wow, great brushes - they must make splendid paintings"
Roel

Direct link | Posted on Jun 7, 2013 at 17:08 UTC
On article Classic lines when clients want you to work for free (141 comments in total)
In reply to:

SemperAugustus: The new loaded word is "donation"... amounts to the same with the same arguments:
- Good exposure, good marketing
- Networking, etc.
My answer is "not interested", if you donate or work for free you are marketing yourself as cheap/no cost resource. Your work will be appreciated as such.

I do not agree, at least not totally.
See my later reply to the article itself.
I don't think using those conditions "cheapens" my work.
And I can tell it is highly appreciated.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 7, 2013 at 17:06 UTC
On article Classic lines when clients want you to work for free (141 comments in total)

I do the occasional pro bono job, but under my conditions:
* only for good causes that I support and know don't have the budget
* editorial and creative control
* no fees, but expenses reimbursed
* copyright remains with me: only a licence for a well specified use that is exclusively for the good cause (all commercial use excluded)
* guaranteed exposure (no images for internal use : they must be used for specified publicly distributed ends (book, brochure, exhibition, ...)

Approached like that, pro bono work can open doors and be a win-win.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 7, 2013 at 17:05 UTC as 15th comment
In reply to:

RoelHendrickx: Corny but fun...

I did give it a try.
Quick pic of my daughter here:
http://roelh.zenfolio.com/p402011222/h69147d19#h69147d19
Using this thing has a kind of "craft" feeling to it (which is a strange thing to say with anything digital, I guess), and it is also a bit random (like Hipstamatic) but in a fun way.
I'll leave it on the Phone for a while I think...

Direct link | Posted on Jun 7, 2013 at 16:35 UTC

Corny but fun...

Direct link | Posted on Jun 7, 2013 at 13:58 UTC as 15th comment | 3 replies

So much for Josh Orter's 15 minutes of fame.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 7, 2013 at 13:51 UTC as 14th comment

One of the most interesting articles so far on DPR.
This is really value beyond this-or-that camera (or Phone) is so-and-so.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 4, 2013 at 11:20 UTC as 7th comment
Total: 132, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »