ozturert

Lives in Norway Oslo, Norway
Works as a Civil Engineer
Joined on Mar 7, 2009

Comments

Total: 383, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Joe Ogiba: Wow, UHS-1 SD cards are so much more expensive compared to CFast cards for 4K cameras like the Canon XC10 ;)
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1164632-REG/pny_technologies_p_sdx256u395_ge_256gb_elite_sdxc_uhs_1_card.html

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1186716-REG/lexar_lc256crbna3600_pro_3600x_cfast_memory.html

BTW , why would anyone want to use a SDHC card in any 4K camera when SDXC cards are a dime a dozen.

Some people actually already have SDHC cards

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2016 at 06:48 UTC
In reply to:

elgol20: Where is the update for the 7R, lossless RAW etc?!

Sony wants you to buy the new goodies

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2016 at 06:47 UTC
On article The Canon that can: Canon EOS 80D Review (576 comments in total)

Excellent all-around camera

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2016 at 06:46 UTC as 77th comment

I I wasn't mad, I'd say D500 is quite close to D750's overall image performance. That's impressive. But then, D7200 is also close anyway :)

Link | Posted on Apr 27, 2016 at 06:42 UTC as 56th comment
In reply to:

Arizona Sunset: This camera looks wonderful.

Perhaps paired with a faster f1.2 Olympus or Panaleica lens at 35mm FOV, to compliment the Nocticron, even better.

Well Olympus confirmed f1.2 lenses are coming, and Panasonic has one coming (90% 12mm). So those are not only rumors.

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2016 at 19:30 UTC
In reply to:

Arizona Sunset: This camera looks wonderful.

Perhaps paired with a faster f1.2 Olympus or Panaleica lens at 35mm FOV, to compliment the Nocticron, even better.

BostonC, all cameras that are sold now had been rumors before.

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2016 at 13:30 UTC
On article Fujifilm X70 Review (344 comments in total)

Look at "Cons". They have been more or less the same since XPro1:
Critical detail at 100% suffers
Waxy-looking skin in high ISO images
AF tends to hunt
X-Trans sensor design limits Raw-converter choice
And lens... X100s and X100T's lenses were good but not very good in my opinion. Strange though, as Fuji's X-series prime lenses are usually very good (except from 18mm f2.0) but X100s and this X70 are not as good as rivals.

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2016 at 12:50 UTC as 36th comment | 9 replies

Summary: Mirrorless cameras still need time to substitute DSLRs for fast action, and that's quite normal and expected. By the way, 7D is quite old now :)

Link | Posted on Apr 13, 2016 at 14:10 UTC as 40th comment | 1 reply
On article Swirly bokeh: Lensbaby announces Twist 60 lens (118 comments in total)

The sh.tt.er the image you get from lens, the more expensive it gets.
"Hey, we take your state of the art camera and destroy your images so badly that'll make you want to waste your hard-earned money".
But some like the effect, eh?

Link | Posted on Apr 13, 2016 at 11:23 UTC as 12th comment | 1 reply
On article Hands on with the Hasselblad H6D 50c/100c (260 comments in total)

Can we just buy the sensor? No?

Link | Posted on Apr 13, 2016 at 11:12 UTC as 33rd comment
In reply to:

ozturert: At 10:42; I see 150mm @f1.8. One heck of a lens :)
Very good video, thanks.

75mm is excellent, if only it did not hunt focus sometimes.

Link | Posted on Apr 12, 2016 at 20:00 UTC

At 10:42; I see 150mm @f1.8. One heck of a lens :)
Very good video, thanks.

Link | Posted on Apr 11, 2016 at 12:31 UTC as 110th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

ozturert: Go and feed homeless people instead...

Everyone = Only you. The world is not revolving around you. Now go and pay 500 bucks to some metal.

Link | Posted on Apr 8, 2016 at 07:29 UTC
In reply to:

ozturert: Go and feed homeless people instead...

darngooddesign, how do you know that I'm not?

Link | Posted on Apr 7, 2016 at 07:00 UTC

Go and feed homeless people instead...

Link | Posted on Apr 6, 2016 at 19:14 UTC as 37th comment | 7 replies
On article Nikon D5 real-world low light, high ISO samples (280 comments in total)
In reply to:

ozturert: Looks very good. But then D4 was very good too, and even D3s...
And can we see real low light photos, where you don't use 1/1000 shutter speed?

disasterpiece, higher shutter speed means that the light was too low to require that high ISO speeds. In concerts (especially like the ones in photos) you would not need 1/1000.
I remember very well when D7000 was released, there were high ISO samples on internet and everyone was claiming that this camera would be better than D700. Then it became obvious that D700 was still better, those samples were taken under good light (say ISO6400, f8, 1/1000) to make the high ISO performance look good.
I'm not saying that D5 is bad, it's probably the best Nikon DSLR ever in high ISO.

Link | Posted on Apr 3, 2016 at 07:55 UTC
On article Nikon D5 real-world low light, high ISO samples (280 comments in total)

Looks very good. But then D4 was very good too, and even D3s...
And can we see real low light photos, where you don't use 1/1000 shutter speed?

Link | Posted on Apr 1, 2016 at 14:28 UTC as 22nd comment | 6 replies
On article Hands-on with the Sony RX10 III (302 comments in total)
In reply to:

vesa1tahti: No tilting screen, no tilting EVF => no place in the market.

No place in your market maybe (I mean your home)

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 10:35 UTC
In reply to:

ozturert: D5 and D4s look about 1 stop darker than 1DxII and A7SII. Why is that? Does Nikon cheat like Fuji or is it because of higher contrast?

Now they look the same. Have you changed something? Or did I get a good sleep :)
Fuji's ISO6400 is Nikon's ISO3200. That's what I call "cheating" but they claim "we use another ISO standard", as if ISO is not a standard by itself :)

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2016 at 08:55 UTC

D5 and D4s look about 1 stop darker than 1DxII and A7SII. Why is that? Does Nikon cheat like Fuji or is it because of higher contrast?

Link | Posted on Mar 28, 2016 at 21:59 UTC as 38th comment | 2 replies
Total: 383, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »