ozturert

ozturert

Lives in Norway Oslo, Norway
Works as a Civil Engineer
Joined on Mar 7, 2009

Comments

Total: 186, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Opinion: Why the Canon XC10 is a big deal article (813 comments in total)
In reply to:

ozturert: My Samsung Note3 takes 4K video, so this product is bad.
If this was produced by Sony, we'd all cherish and cheer up, and brag about how innovative Sony is and how Canikon lags behind :)

Didn't know that. Still 1/3 of Canon. Again, not sure if Canon codec is efficient or not.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 13, 2015 at 09:25 UTC
On Opinion: Why the Canon XC10 is a big deal article (813 comments in total)
In reply to:

ozturert: My Samsung Note3 takes 4K video, so this product is bad.
If this was produced by Sony, we'd all cherish and cheer up, and brag about how innovative Sony is and how Canikon lags behind :)

Ax100 is 60 mbps at 4K. This Canon is more than 300. Not sure if Canon's codec is more efficient or not though.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 11, 2015 at 16:18 UTC
On Opinion: Why the Canon XC10 is a big deal article (813 comments in total)

My Samsung Note3 takes 4K video, so this product is bad.
If this was produced by Sony, we'd all cherish and cheer up, and brag about how innovative Sony is and how Canikon lags behind :)

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2015 at 07:35 UTC as 64th comment | 9 replies
On Opinion: Why the Canon XC10 is a big deal article (813 comments in total)
In reply to:

ozturert: This is Canon, so it must be bad :)
Typical DPR user :)

It is not the ultimate camera at all. It is just a good video camera with some photographic capabilities.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 9, 2015 at 17:21 UTC
On Opinion: Why the Canon XC10 is a big deal article (813 comments in total)

This is Canon, so it must be bad :)
Typical DPR user :)

Direct link | Posted on Apr 9, 2015 at 14:41 UTC as 87th comment | 6 replies
On Opinion: Why the Canon XC10 is a big deal article (813 comments in total)

I don't need this camera but I can see how useful this can be for some.
Ups, sorry! I should have said "this is an extremely expensive and nonsense camera. my FZ1000 is much better and cheap!" :)

Direct link | Posted on Apr 9, 2015 at 06:47 UTC as 149th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

ozturert: The results are as bad and as good as I expected. The price and optical quality are not in line, I think. I'd say the lens deserves max 600$.

dbo, that's what I meant. 24-36MP's deserve better lenses. This 24-240mm is not that good, thus looks expensive. 1000$ is a lot of money for a mediocre lens. Similar to Nikon 28-300mm VR.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 9, 2015 at 06:39 UTC
In reply to:

ozturert: The results are as bad and as good as I expected. The price and optical quality are not in line, I think. I'd say the lens deserves max 600$.

dbo, I looked at the images in 4 different screens, none is sharp. In fact, my Nikon 28-300mm VR was really sharp on D700 but was as bad as this Sony on D800, so I sold it.
How do you understand the build quality just by looking at pictures? I had a Sony 18-200mm LE. It had a very stiff zoom ring and was optically similar to this one. BUT, I had paid only 250$ to 18-200 so its performance was acceptable. This Sony... is different considering the price.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 8, 2015 at 08:39 UTC

The results are as bad and as good as I expected. The price and optical quality are not in line, I think. I'd say the lens deserves max 600$.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 7, 2015 at 08:15 UTC as 9th comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

ccclai: Equivalent to F2.8 in full frame?

How Voigtlander is slower than Nikon 20mm f1.8? Nikon is slower, much slower.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 3, 2015 at 17:25 UTC
On Island life: Samsung NX500 Shooting Experience article (164 comments in total)
In reply to:

Puljak: It looks as if this BSI sensor is still a bit behind the latest one from Sony. The one with the man holding a torch was shot at ISO 125. I looked at both files and the processed one indeed has huge amounts of detail pulled out, but a lot of noise as well. It's not bad looking noise, but it's there.

You'd see noise from Sony sensors too. To me Samsung's sensor looks very comparable to Sony's.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 26, 2015 at 19:11 UTC
On Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Review preview (744 comments in total)
In reply to:

ozturert: You write 10s of pages of review, you explain excellent functions and ergonomy, you explain how fast AF and operation is, how excellent and compact m4/3 lenses are, how 40MP function can be useful, how IBIS gives you new creativity options (such as going down all the way to 1sec, even less shutter speed) etc...

Then one cowboy comes and says "hey but A7 has full frame sensor"...

I think you are the first person I've seen who likes to see pictures on 16:9 TV. 4:3 is not for everyone, I'd agree with that but the reason is not "it's not compatible with 16:9 TVs".

Direct link | Posted on Mar 23, 2015 at 02:14 UTC
On Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Review preview (744 comments in total)
In reply to:

ozturert: You write 10s of pages of review, you explain excellent functions and ergonomy, you explain how fast AF and operation is, how excellent and compact m4/3 lenses are, how 40MP function can be useful, how IBIS gives you new creativity options (such as going down all the way to 1sec, even less shutter speed) etc...

Then one cowboy comes and says "hey but A7 has full frame sensor"...

?? Don't get it. Why would you take a photo in 16:9 format?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 20, 2015 at 18:29 UTC
On Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Review preview (744 comments in total)
In reply to:

ozturert: You write 10s of pages of review, you explain excellent functions and ergonomy, you explain how fast AF and operation is, how excellent and compact m4/3 lenses are, how 40MP function can be useful, how IBIS gives you new creativity options (such as going down all the way to 1sec, even less shutter speed) etc...

Then one cowboy comes and says "hey but A7 has full frame sensor"...

Photokhan, you did not get my point I guess..
And do we have 16:9 sensors? As most TV's come with 16:9 ratio now :)

Direct link | Posted on Mar 20, 2015 at 17:26 UTC
On Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Review preview (744 comments in total)

You write 10s of pages of review, you explain excellent functions and ergonomy, you explain how fast AF and operation is, how excellent and compact m4/3 lenses are, how 40MP function can be useful, how IBIS gives you new creativity options (such as going down all the way to 1sec, even less shutter speed) etc...

Then one cowboy comes and says "hey but A7 has full frame sensor"...

Direct link | Posted on Mar 19, 2015 at 22:46 UTC as 70th comment | 13 replies
On Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Review preview (744 comments in total)
In reply to:

Dimit: Silver award is fair as it is just a minor evolution of EM5...Needless to say-but I do!!-it is expensive as Olympus always does.You can get A7 with the same money!!!

Still comparing sensors only...

Direct link | Posted on Mar 19, 2015 at 22:42 UTC
On Nikon D5500 real-world samples article (129 comments in total)
In reply to:

ozturert: Add AF microadjustment (Canon style), give us pancakes like Canon did, give us smaller f2.8 zooms.
I don't mind about the "plastic" feeling, because overall D5500 is an excellent camera.

And a good AF system.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 9, 2015 at 09:59 UTC
On Nikon D5500 real-world samples article (129 comments in total)

Add AF microadjustment (Canon style), give us pancakes like Canon did, give us smaller f2.8 zooms.
I don't mind about the "plastic" feeling, because overall D5500 is an excellent camera.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 7, 2015 at 13:45 UTC as 9th comment | 2 replies

Now I'm waiting for a "Tamron looks sharper: Why we're not worried" article from Rishi :)
I haven't realized that 14-24mm has sharpness issues between focusing wide open and closed aperture. If you use live view, I would not expect any difference but I'm not %100 sure without trying.
I guess curvature would not effect from this distance, would it?
Anyway, 14-24mm f2.8 is a remarkable lens and Tamron looks very competitive too.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 21:59 UTC as 81st comment | 3 replies
On Nikon D7200 First Impressions Review preview (859 comments in total)
In reply to:

ozturert: I'll hold my comment until I see the DxO Mark point. I just have to see the god..mn number to feel comfortable. I know that it's way better than all Canons but if I can see the point with my own eyes, I'll come back and fire!
DxO is just everything to me... wouldn't live without it...

You really need to start thinking. It's a very nice exercise :)

Direct link | Posted on Mar 4, 2015 at 18:50 UTC
Total: 186, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »