Jurka

Jurka

Has a website at http://www.portreti.lv/
Joined on Aug 29, 2012

Comments

Total: 52, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
On Sony Alpha a7 II Review preview (806 comments in total)

Autofocus is useless for moving subjects.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 31, 2015 at 20:04 UTC as 176th comment
On Olympus OM-D E-M5 II First Impressions Review preview (1392 comments in total)

Expensive for such small and noisy sensor. Every, even cheapest Canon, has better iso and dr range and details.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 5, 2015 at 13:32 UTC as 261st comment | 6 replies
On Adobe to acquire Fotolia for $800 million cash article (25 comments in total)

You mean "Cash"? 800 mil is tonnes of paper!!!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 13, 2014 at 17:41 UTC as 9th comment | 1 reply
On JVC introduces GY-LS300 4K camcorder with MFT mount article (79 comments in total)

Sony sensor again?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 14, 2014 at 17:26 UTC as 6th comment
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1864 comments in total)

12 mp? Really? Are you sure?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 30, 2014 at 15:11 UTC as 51st comment | 20 replies
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 Review preview (484 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jurka: A 6000 is cheaper and has better DR, DOF, ISO, Colors. Try it with 35 1,8 oss lens!
Gh2 is good for video, but gh3 not, because it cannot shoot in shutter priority mode and auto iso. Auto iso always locks at high values and stay overexposed. This is reason why i sold gh3. Then i try a 6000 and stay with Sony. Pana is nothing close.

I have bad and expensive expierence with gh3.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 30, 2014 at 10:37 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 Review preview (484 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jurka: A 6000 is cheaper and has better DR, DOF, ISO, Colors. Try it with 35 1,8 oss lens!
Gh2 is good for video, but gh3 not, because it cannot shoot in shutter priority mode and auto iso. Auto iso always locks at high values and stay overexposed. This is reason why i sold gh3. Then i try a 6000 and stay with Sony. Pana is nothing close.

I have bad and costly expierence with gh3.
This is about to stay away of gh4.
Yeah, gh2 is great for those times, but gadgets always must to grove up!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 25, 2014 at 14:16 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 Review preview (484 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jurka: A 6000 is cheaper and has better DR, DOF, ISO, Colors. Try it with 35 1,8 oss lens!
Gh2 is good for video, but gh3 not, because it cannot shoot in shutter priority mode and auto iso. Auto iso always locks at high values and stay overexposed. This is reason why i sold gh3. Then i try a 6000 and stay with Sony. Pana is nothing close.

For stills shooting i mostly use 5D with 70-200 in studio and A99 with Tamron 28-75 2.8. Excellent lens, better than Canon 24-70!!! Samples here: http://www.portreti.lv/kaitbords-saulkrastos-12-augusta-2013-kitesurfing/

Direct link | Posted on Oct 24, 2014 at 14:14 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 Review preview (484 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jurka: A 6000 is cheaper and has better DR, DOF, ISO, Colors. Try it with 35 1,8 oss lens!
Gh2 is good for video, but gh3 not, because it cannot shoot in shutter priority mode and auto iso. Auto iso always locks at high values and stay overexposed. This is reason why i sold gh3. Then i try a 6000 and stay with Sony. Pana is nothing close.

And here is FE 70-200 f4 with A6000. http://www.kaitbords.lv/wp/bildes-no-kaitpartija-sveiks-rudentin-2014-berzciema-2014-gada-14-septembri/

Direct link | Posted on Oct 24, 2014 at 06:54 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 Review preview (484 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jurka: A 6000 is cheaper and has better DR, DOF, ISO, Colors. Try it with 35 1,8 oss lens!
Gh2 is good for video, but gh3 not, because it cannot shoot in shutter priority mode and auto iso. Auto iso always locks at high values and stay overexposed. This is reason why i sold gh3. Then i try a 6000 and stay with Sony. Pana is nothing close.

35 1,8 oss is a perfect lens. Especially for video (with nd filters). 70-200 f4 is very good for photo. Also i have 50 mm, wich is not so good as 35, 10-18 oss. 18-105 f4. In real life i use 35 mm and 70-200. When i owned Pana, i always using 14-140, because of very good ois. All other lenses was been without oss and unusable for video shooting handheld. And, yeah, A6000 autofocus ir usable for video, while Pana very often shows "focus jumping". That is a not big problem, because i use focus lock button, while shooting. Sony is better with light lenses and oss. Pana is better with universal 14-140 and best ois in industry. But Sony Cx-900 has it all and inbuilt ND filter also. :) I use A6000 only in extreme darkness, in night. Here is sample footage ir really dark night 4 AM. http://youtu.be/tbr7HxI6vWg?list=UUbdwnsZdvzcRVfhba-LYOMw

Direct link | Posted on Oct 24, 2014 at 06:53 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 Review preview (484 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jurka: A 6000 is cheaper and has better DR, DOF, ISO, Colors. Try it with 35 1,8 oss lens!
Gh2 is good for video, but gh3 not, because it cannot shoot in shutter priority mode and auto iso. Auto iso always locks at high values and stay overexposed. This is reason why i sold gh3. Then i try a 6000 and stay with Sony. Pana is nothing close.

There is a big possibility to Gh 4 is upgraded Gh 3, with same sensor, interface and same auto iso bug. For 1600 eur.... Ou, yeah, 4k!!!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 23, 2014 at 19:57 UTC
On Readers' Showcase: Documentary and Street photography article (108 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jurka: Those pics are empty.

Not just go to old city market, then presss presss presssss shutter with 50 mm lens and DEEESATURATE (for true ART, of course!).

Direct link | Posted on Oct 21, 2014 at 17:28 UTC
On Readers' Showcase: Documentary and Street photography article (108 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jurka: Those pics are empty.

Early or not, i never just press that shutter button. I think before i shoot- is this my capture can be be interesting to someone?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 21, 2014 at 17:27 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 Review preview (484 comments in total)

A 6000 is cheaper and has better DR, DOF, ISO, Colors. Try it with 35 1,8 oss lens!
Gh2 is good for video, but gh3 not, because it cannot shoot in shutter priority mode and auto iso. Auto iso always locks at high values and stay overexposed. This is reason why i sold gh3. Then i try a 6000 and stay with Sony. Pana is nothing close.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 21, 2014 at 15:28 UTC as 32nd comment | 20 replies
On Readers' Showcase: Documentary and Street photography article (108 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jurka: Those pics are empty.

I am not good enough, to show my pics to world. But that does not mean i cannot jugde others.
Okay, here is one of my galleries, if you need it, to speak with me! :) http://www.kaitbords.lv/wp/bildes-no-kaitosanas-koklites-12-augusta-2013/

And here is another one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ew6cQ2jK4yQ

And finally, tits, of course! You must like its: http://www.portreti.lv/kazu-fotografs-juris-popovs-portfolio/fotosesija-arpus-studijas/

Direct link | Posted on Oct 21, 2014 at 06:18 UTC

Yeah, E-mount moves slightly, but it does not impact to image quality actually, never!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 19, 2014 at 15:33 UTC as 37th comment | 1 reply
On Readers' Showcase: Documentary and Street photography article (108 comments in total)

Those pics are empty.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 19, 2014 at 15:30 UTC as 46th comment | 10 replies
On High Flyer? DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ Drone Review article (180 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jurka: My second time P2V+ flight footage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKoKdVrOBnM

I meant- very easy to use without any skills!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 14, 2014 at 13:21 UTC
On High Flyer? DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ Drone Review article (180 comments in total)

My second time P2V+ flight footage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKoKdVrOBnM

Direct link | Posted on Oct 14, 2014 at 13:21 UTC as 73rd comment | 1 reply
On Sony a5100 First Impressions Review preview (582 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jurka: Sony fukked me up again!!! My A6000 costs 750 Eur WITHOUT havc-s codec...
:(
Ok, i have a hot shoe for mic! Bicches...

Evf is ok feature, but where is havc codec???? And touchscreen for focus point, like Pana GH?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2014 at 19:52 UTC
Total: 52, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »