Autofocus is useless for moving subjects.
Expensive for such small and noisy sensor. Every, even cheapest Canon, has better iso and dr range and details.
You mean "Cash"? 800 mil is tonnes of paper!!!
Sony sensor again?
12 mp? Really? Are you sure?
Jurka: A 6000 is cheaper and has better DR, DOF, ISO, Colors. Try it with 35 1,8 oss lens!Gh2 is good for video, but gh3 not, because it cannot shoot in shutter priority mode and auto iso. Auto iso always locks at high values and stay overexposed. This is reason why i sold gh3. Then i try a 6000 and stay with Sony. Pana is nothing close.
I have bad and expensive expierence with gh3.
I have bad and costly expierence with gh3.This is about to stay away of gh4.Yeah, gh2 is great for those times, but gadgets always must to grove up!
For stills shooting i mostly use 5D with 70-200 in studio and A99 with Tamron 28-75 2.8. Excellent lens, better than Canon 24-70!!! Samples here: http://www.portreti.lv/kaitbords-saulkrastos-12-augusta-2013-kitesurfing/
And here is FE 70-200 f4 with A6000. http://www.kaitbords.lv/wp/bildes-no-kaitpartija-sveiks-rudentin-2014-berzciema-2014-gada-14-septembri/
35 1,8 oss is a perfect lens. Especially for video (with nd filters). 70-200 f4 is very good for photo. Also i have 50 mm, wich is not so good as 35, 10-18 oss. 18-105 f4. In real life i use 35 mm and 70-200. When i owned Pana, i always using 14-140, because of very good ois. All other lenses was been without oss and unusable for video shooting handheld. And, yeah, A6000 autofocus ir usable for video, while Pana very often shows "focus jumping". That is a not big problem, because i use focus lock button, while shooting. Sony is better with light lenses and oss. Pana is better with universal 14-140 and best ois in industry. But Sony Cx-900 has it all and inbuilt ND filter also. :) I use A6000 only in extreme darkness, in night. Here is sample footage ir really dark night 4 AM. http://youtu.be/tbr7HxI6vWg?list=UUbdwnsZdvzcRVfhba-LYOMw
There is a big possibility to Gh 4 is upgraded Gh 3, with same sensor, interface and same auto iso bug. For 1600 eur.... Ou, yeah, 4k!!!
Jurka: Those pics are empty.
Not just go to old city market, then presss presss presssss shutter with 50 mm lens and DEEESATURATE (for true ART, of course!).
Early or not, i never just press that shutter button. I think before i shoot- is this my capture can be be interesting to someone?
A 6000 is cheaper and has better DR, DOF, ISO, Colors. Try it with 35 1,8 oss lens!Gh2 is good for video, but gh3 not, because it cannot shoot in shutter priority mode and auto iso. Auto iso always locks at high values and stay overexposed. This is reason why i sold gh3. Then i try a 6000 and stay with Sony. Pana is nothing close.
I am not good enough, to show my pics to world. But that does not mean i cannot jugde others. Okay, here is one of my galleries, if you need it, to speak with me! :) http://www.kaitbords.lv/wp/bildes-no-kaitosanas-koklites-12-augusta-2013/
And here is another one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ew6cQ2jK4yQ
And finally, tits, of course! You must like its: http://www.portreti.lv/kazu-fotografs-juris-popovs-portfolio/fotosesija-arpus-studijas/
Yeah, E-mount moves slightly, but it does not impact to image quality actually, never!
Those pics are empty.
Jurka: My second time P2V+ flight footage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKoKdVrOBnM
I meant- very easy to use without any skills!
My second time P2V+ flight footage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKoKdVrOBnM
Jurka: Sony fukked me up again!!! My A6000 costs 750 Eur WITHOUT havc-s codec...:(Ok, i have a hot shoe for mic! Bicches...
Evf is ok feature, but where is havc codec???? And touchscreen for focus point, like Pana GH?