photosen

photosen

Joined on May 13, 2009

Comments

Total: 152, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Less points because of the over the top music.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 28, 2015 at 20:52 UTC as 8th comment
On Fujifilm X100T Review preview (544 comments in total)

Interesting camera, useful review.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 25, 2015 at 18:16 UTC as 65th comment

Nice review, that Tamron is sure looking good...

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 21:43 UTC as 79th comment

Ok let's play crazy headlines then: 2016, Canon buys Sony's former sensor subsidiary, blows up factory. Game over NiPePaFuSalympus?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 21, 2015 at 00:04 UTC as 18th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

rsf3127: To those who believe Sony is going bakrupt and Samsung is the new deal, please read about the meaning of keiretsu & zaibatsu, and their korean counterpart, the chaebols.

This of central importance to get to the kernel of the problem. It is the neo-Keynesian strategy creating giants that are too big to go bankrupt - and to compete with small businesses. Until they eventually go bakrupt when the aid from the government dries out.

Neo keynesian LOL! Poor Keynes is going to be the cause of cancer next.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 21, 2015 at 00:01 UTC
On Olympus OM-D E-M5 II First Impressions Review preview (1393 comments in total)

Nice camera, nice review.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 02:59 UTC as 119th comment

The thing is we all need to look at market numbers, volume and profitability, before we can make these sweeping statements.

While mirrorless cameras from Olympus, Fuji and Panasonic are nice, Canon has in fact responded wth the SL1 and a couple of pancakes, which fit the bill nicely for many, and without the need for lens compatibility problems.

On the other hand the 11-22, and 22mm lenses seem nice, perhaps they just need a couple of small telephotos for the M system. Although for me it's still no viewfinder, no deal.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 11, 2015 at 18:09 UTC as 187th comment | 1 reply
On Canon EOS 5DS / SR First Impressions Review preview (2342 comments in total)

Do I need an 8k monitor now??

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 15:45 UTC as 386th comment

Yikes! A super rebel or mini 70D... Cool!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 15:29 UTC as 64th comment
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 Review preview (918 comments in total)

Not for me, but it looks a nice camera. Good review too.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 21, 2014 at 20:49 UTC as 79th comment
On Video: Capturing nature with the Canon EOS 7D Mark II article (198 comments in total)

Great video DPR! Useful, interesting... I'm not sure it was quite necessary to face mountain lions and wolves though! Now Nikon users will demand that you face wild tigers.

It's very sad to see people feel threatened by a brand's progress and see this as an ad.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 11, 2014 at 14:56 UTC as 64th comment | 1 reply
On Price released for Brikk's 24k gold Nikon Df article (390 comments in total)

To each his own... But this is now my official example for poor taste.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 31, 2014 at 02:43 UTC as 141st comment
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (2701 comments in total)
In reply to:

Stollen1234: So what People are Saying there is no visible improvement with Canon 7 D Mark II Over Canon 7D.

Wow this is Pretty signifikant..

Only the blind or obtuse.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 26, 2014 at 15:12 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (2701 comments in total)
In reply to:

IvanM: I think the 7D2 could be a very nice backup camera to something like the 6D, which lacks the AF & speed capabilities but is clearly the high iso champ for normal budgets.

Just think a 7D2 plus a 300mm f4 L IS lens will give you the equivalent (or close as dammit) of a 1DX plus 500mm f4 L mk2 lens at a fraction of the price. I think that is what this camera is all about....

Lets also hope that this sensor technology filters down to the next EosM, G1X mk3 etc etc.

Beyond your budgetary constraints or mine he's making a good point, there are many more people who can afford a 6D and a 7DII with a 300mm f4 than there are for the $6,800 1DX and a $9,500 500mm f4.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 26, 2014 at 15:11 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (2701 comments in total)
In reply to:

Hibiscusbloom: Having examined the files in comparison with those of IDX, MK3, D4s and others, I would say there isn't really much of an improvement in IQ and low noise performance. Canon hyped it up too much. People looking for near FF performance had better be more realistic.

In my eyes, the improvement of iq over the 70D is slight. It appears to let in a wee bit more light and perhaps a very slight noise reduction, very slight.

With advanced post processing, the raw files can be rendered much better.

However, there are a host of new features, notably the much talked about improved AF, weather sealing, 10 fps amongst others that might sway many towards this camera.

Is the price justifiable? Depends, if you always wanted FF and about to make a choice on a particular DSLR, then mouth-watering models like Nikon D750 might be more enticing offering you the best of FF with crop sensor ability. If you already have Canon lenses and looking to pursue birds and animals in the wild, this is it!

Your comment is a new low.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 24, 2014 at 14:32 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (2701 comments in total)
In reply to:

Retzius: Looks pretty good!

BTW, the Pentax K-3 looks amazing.

In RAW at ISO 6400 they look the same, perhaps the 7DII a tad better; but instead of saying "Ha! Pentax is doomed!", I think it speaks well of both, it's a high standard.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 24, 2014 at 14:30 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (2701 comments in total)
In reply to:

Greg VdB: The most important observations are in my opinion: (1) Canon made really significant improvements to its APS-C sensor in just one year (compare to 70D), and (2) it is now placed comfortably in the pack of APS-C cameras, probably very near the front (as one might expect for a newly introduced camera). Point (1) is very promising for future Canon releases across the different classes, and Point (2) means Canon are no longer "4 years behind" in sensor technology... As to the question if this then makes the 7D II the best camera for everyone? Of course not!! That depends fully on your shooting style, personal preferences, budget, etc. I'm always suprized that people seem to expect the perfect camera-that-fits-everyone with every new release, and then start bashing when it isn't exactly that...

Good points, particularly the comparison with the 70D. A good percentage of the discussion is psychological, people so insecure they marry their brand and need to bash "the enemy", while others confuse photography with sensor technology.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 24, 2014 at 14:23 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (2701 comments in total)
In reply to:

Reinhard136: Getting close to the competition, but makes you realise how far the 7d had slipped at high iso, frightening how far canon is prepared to fall behind. If the m2 image is the same in another 5 years, it will be facing not the next sony sensor, which would not be far off, but at best the one after that ........
But should the competition really be based on sensor capacity or price ? If so it is pretty sad to compare the A7r with the m2.

Or you could compare the 7D with its only competitor, the D300 and see if it had slipped anywhere but in your imagination; and then compare the 7DII to the nonexistent D400 to see who's fallen behind.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 24, 2014 at 14:11 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II: A professional's opinion article (501 comments in total)

Interesting.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 22, 2014 at 19:36 UTC as 140th comment
On Accessory Review: LaCie Rugged Thunderbolt article (39 comments in total)

Anecdotically I've seen plenty of Lacie drives fail, it's usually a shock for Mac owners to realize inside it's a normal WD/Seagate/Samsung/whatever hard drive... For the road you should get an external SSD even if it's much smaller capacity, mechanical drives are way too fragile to be lugging around.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 18, 2014 at 16:25 UTC as 7th comment | 1 reply
Total: 152, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »