Just what I thought, sounds like a Pain in the ASS.....why does everything on these cameras have to be a hassle!
Do any new bodies offer that option?
I have a D200, I'm curious...
I heard one ESPN photographer tell me once....DIgital photography allows even amateur photographers to get 50 great shots out of the 2000 they shoot!
You could never do as much to a neg in a Darkroom as you can to a digital image!
I think technology can make an average photographer look great overnight! In the film camera days, you didn't get do overs!
I often wonder how the great photographers of the past would feel about today's Photographic technology! With limitless Color, temperature, contrast settings available to most Hobby and Pro's...
Affordability for one, how many long range lenses that shoot 2.8 can you think of cost less than $3,000??? An 18-200m. F2.8 would be Way to cost prohibitive to produce!
You telling me the 70-210 can shoot at 2.8 at Full Zoom??
Well how much distortion does the 70-210 have at 2.8? same difference!
Why would anyone make the investment on a FF body only to use DX lenses? Doesn't make sense...
Is that possible and how much would it run?
Well Mojo I have had my D200 since '06, and Im not sure if it is the Sigma 18-200m Im using or what but during a shoot all of a sudden I wont get any Focus or nothing! Lense goes dead till I turn...
Isn't the D700 a FF body? I'm looking for the best DX body for best image quality over 3200 ISO!
can someone explain that one to me? ISO 100-6400. (12800 with Boost)????