mrc4nl

mrc4nl

Joined on Dec 5, 2013

Comments

Total: 33, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »

Panasonic gm1s?

i thought it was an older model, and i dont recall a S version of it

Direct link | Posted on Nov 19, 2014 at 19:05 UTC as 19th comment | 3 replies

Put this one in a smartphone please!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 21, 2014 at 07:58 UTC as 34th comment

I would rather buy a LX100 than the Panasonic 12-35 f2.8 for my gx7.That lens is heavier, slower apperture,and more expensive than the lx100 with the build in lens. Its a no brainer if i had the money.

of coarse the lx100 cant replace my other lenses like telezoom or uwa.But that's why i have my gx7 as a main camera anyway.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 1, 2014 at 17:45 UTC as 162nd comment | 3 replies
On Hands-on with Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 article (434 comments in total)
In reply to:

PLAMBERT: The new GM5 might just be a better camera as it has interchangeable lenses and the size is comparable. The drawback of interchangeable lenses is that you have to carry them with you to use them! The whole outfit would be much heavier than the LX100. I use a compact coupled rangefinder camera with various lenses and the outfit bag is heavy, no zoom lenses included.
Phil

yes overall, but in the 24-75 range there are no mft zooms that offer f1.7-f2.8. Just two f2.8 zooms, wich are great, but bulky.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 22, 2014 at 10:50 UTC
In reply to:

bar1: Can someone confirm this:

The LX100 post has the following information:

"The LX100 integrates Wi-Fi® connectivity (IEEE 802.11 b/g/n) with NFC (Near Field Communication) technology camera to offer more flexible shooting experience and instant image sharing with easy operation."

There is NO mention of remote control functionality.

This Leica post states:

"The Leica D-Lux’s integrated Wi-Fi module allows remote control from a smartphone or tablet to wirelessly transfer still images and videos using a Wi-Fi connection."

So, does only the Leica version allow remote control? What I'm trying to determine is if the *camera settings* can be changed remotely (shutter speed, aperture, perhaps zoom, etc.).

Maybe because it would be ironic if the Panasonic image app worked on a leica camera :D

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2014 at 10:49 UTC
On Week in review: 8 things we learned article (48 comments in total)

about the copyright, if a animal steals your gopro camera to take footage,it cant be copyrighted

but who is the ower of the copyright if you deliberately strap a gopro (or whatever camera) to a animal?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 30, 2014 at 09:00 UTC as 20th comment
In reply to:

samfan: More expensive than their (great) 85/1.4? That's weird. They must be really confident about it.

Also, where did the 50/1.2 rumors come from then?

yes dedicated cine lenses are different.These "cine" leses are just dslr lenses with gears bolted and smooth apperture ring.optical design is the same.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 28, 2014 at 13:33 UTC
On Hasselblad unveils pixel-shifting 200MP H5D-200c MS article (248 comments in total)
In reply to:

John TF: How close would GigaPan + DSLR approximate these images?

just dont make to wide panorama's rotational movement is like having a big curved sensor. it greatly increases field curvature

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2014 at 22:30 UTC
On Hasselblad unveils pixel-shifting 200MP H5D-200c MS article (248 comments in total)

i thought pixels were square. anyway shifting 1 subpixel would make sense because a detail is now recorded for all 3 subpixels instead of a small offset

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2014 at 22:27 UTC as 39th comment
In reply to:

Langusta: “What do you call 500 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?”

a group of people who want to get down to the bottom of things

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2014 at 16:00 UTC
In reply to:

Rooru S: imagine this lens on the a7S... Not going to buy it since I already know it's soft wide open but at least it's an option to shoot in reaaaally dark conditions. ISO409600 and f0.95 seems insteresting.

@jun2 Iso3200 is the lowest iso if you want S-Log2 on the a7s

Direct link | Posted on Aug 16, 2014 at 09:03 UTC
In reply to:

Rooru S: imagine this lens on the a7S... Not going to buy it since I already know it's soft wide open but at least it's an option to shoot in reaaaally dark conditions. ISO409600 and f0.95 seems insteresting.

i thinking more like 10 stop filters to keep the exposure under control in broad daylight if using f0.95 and iso3200 :)

Direct link | Posted on Aug 15, 2014 at 11:12 UTC
In reply to:

dmanthree: Didn't Panny already introduce a 4K action cam?

Well sort of. It was a Wearable cam. not a solid one meant to be put on helmets.

Panasonic HX-A500

Direct link | Posted on Aug 6, 2014 at 14:40 UTC
In reply to:

nathantw: If it were 56mm x 56mm sensor then this would be real news. I'm just happy Hasselblad is making a back to fit the v-series and they didn't abandon it altogether.

yeah, this sensor is hardly a medium format one.
43.8 x 32.9x is a lot less then 53.90x40.40 found in the phase one

Direct link | Posted on Jul 25, 2014 at 17:07 UTC
In reply to:

Jacqves: why not to put sensor in the lens ?

Sony did, they called it the qx100 and qx10

Direct link | Posted on Jul 8, 2014 at 19:52 UTC
On What is equivalence and why should I care? article (2067 comments in total)
In reply to:

quezra: Drama incoming in 3... 2...

Nah everybody is outside, taking pictures. They dont bother this :P

Direct link | Posted on Jul 7, 2014 at 11:10 UTC
On Beyond the ordinary: Tim Dodd's Everyday Astronaut article (102 comments in total)

nice series, good storytelling and technique

Direct link | Posted on Jul 5, 2014 at 10:34 UTC as 58th comment
On DPReview Reader Showcase: The beautiful game article (48 comments in total)

Only 3 submitters? i guess the amount of submissions was not that great

Direct link | Posted on Jul 1, 2014 at 08:02 UTC as 19th comment
In reply to:

mrc4nl: "never touch the sensor" well thats easy because every camera has a piece of glass in front of the sensor protecting it.

No i mean any dslr , mirrorless, look at this picture, here U can see the sensor assembly and there is a whole lot in front of the actual sensor
http://mrc4.nl/meuk/groot/P1300563.JPG

Direct link | Posted on Jun 14, 2014 at 23:06 UTC

"never touch the sensor" well thats easy because every camera has a piece of glass in front of the sensor protecting it.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 14, 2014 at 18:19 UTC as 10th comment | 4 replies
Total: 33, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »