Speaking of taking photos in (sort of) public places, has anyone noticed this?
Worrying. There are links in the comments to the original proposal by Julia Reda and the disastrous amendment by Jean-Marie Cavada - and to a petition to prevent the proposal from beoming legislation.
Boscocam: This camera will sell VERY well once Canon does three things:
1. Drop the price down to the proper consumer level - say $1200. It's not a professional camera and is certainly not worth $2500, but it's probably worth half that to a beginner shooting pictures of baby's first steps or the spinning tea cups at Disneyland. No journalist would use such a simplistic camera, and its stills mode is crippled by the lack of RAW shooting.
2. Simplify it even more by offering a real, one button 'auto' mode that does everything for the shooter. Consumers expect ease of use.
3. Start offering this product at Costco, Walmart and Target. They are exceptional at marketing consumer level cameras.
Wow. You've *really* missed the point, haven't you? So much so that I seriously doubt you even read the article.
Welcome to DPReview, by the way...
electronbee: Only thing I don't like is the 1" sensor marketing ploy. The 1" sensor was originally devloped to replace a 1" imaging tube and the sensor is nowhere near an inch on any dimension. Ok, I'm off my pedastal.
Richard, what's wrong with millimetres? Just give the measurement of the diagonal of the frame. It's accurate, it's easy to remember - and more importantly, visualise - and it gives an easy way to compare angle of view with any other format.
What's not to like?
photogeek: At this price, most people on this site would expect a camera to be included with the bag. Maybe not a Leica, but some kind of camera. :-) Really, a sucker is born every minute.
Oh, c'mon, photogeek - $400 for a cool leather camera bag? That's not much more than a Billingham or a Domke. And the Ona doesn't shout "I'm a bag full of cameras - come and get me!"
Man, I'd have one like a shot if I had the spare cash.
Captions on the sample shots would be handy. Without knowing what films they're supposed to be emulating, it's hard to judge whether they're succeeding
graybalanced: Like a lot of giveaways, you must first add this pack to their shopping cart, and then you can't download what's in the shopping cart unless you have or create a VSCO account with your name and email address.
This might matter if you're concerned about leaving behind your contact info for a one-time download.
I set up a dummy email account specifically for this kind of spambait. Works fine.
Nukunukoo: The Nikon booth was fantastic. They are really cutting edge when it comes to video. They are truly ahead of everyone else in this regard.
Thought it might. :-)
spencerda: Hi all,
Enjoyed the video. Bit of a puff piece. Would any pro really use instead of a full frame for their own paid work? Is the Fuji any better or worst than say the Oly 10 or what ever is the competing model? Anyway I did enjoy.
Own the XT-1, do mostly travel and landscape work, still trying to get the best from the camera. Great Jpegs best I have seen. Canon Jpegs suck big time.Still need to find a good Raw converter, any advise is appreciated. As a long time Canon user always shot and worked with Raw.
@nerd2:"50-140 2.8 is only (almost) equivalent to 70-200 f4"
In terms of depth of field, maybe. In terms of exposure, it's a 2.8. Though nit-pickers may insist on measuring it. :-)
London, the South-East and Edinburgh. That's "good geographical coverage", is it? Ha.
And what just about everyone else has said.
SomethingBeautiful: Why the negative exposure comp on a shot with ISO 1600?
Assuming the camera was running in auto mode, the auto exposure would have tried to expose as if the pic was taken in broad daylight. As the photo was taken in a dark interior(?), dialling in compensation makes the scene darker-than-daylight, as it was in reality. It's quicker than faffing about with manual settings.
raybies: waterproofing is improved, she must have tested it.
Well, she does work for the *Seattle* Times... :-)
"The ability to render color in near darkness is useful in automotive cameras that must make do with light on moonless nights."
Since most cars (and drivers) use headlights to deal with moonless nights, I'm guessing we're talking about *military* automotive cameras here. That and/or autonomous vehicles. Interesting, nevertheless.
UnitedNations: It seems for Fuji to do a Full Frame fixed 35mm lens rangefinder all they need is a body generally the size of a X-Pro1. Since Sony already makes a smaller RX1(smaller than x100), I think it is possible for Fuji to make a Full Frame 35mm x100 with a slightly bigger body the size of a x-Pro1. I think the only reason Fuji is not doing this is because such a camera will damage the hype/religion/sales of their other APS-C cameras. I don't think it is because they are worried the camera would get too big.
"I think the only reason Fuji is not doing this is because such a camera will damage the hype/religion/sales of their other APS-C cameras."
I think the main reason Fuji is not doing this is because, like the RX10, it wouldn't sell. And because APS-C is perfectly adequate for almost any photographic situation.
samhain: Great questions! Unfortunently not so great answers, especially the one about not bringing out a full frame x100. That, in a word- SUCKS. That completley sucks.
Sony flopped on the RX1 by leaving off the viewfinder(evf or ovf). If fuji brought out a full frame x100 it would sell through the roof. I honestly dont know what they're thinking.
Not happy about the answer reguarding different focal lengths either. The adapters dont cut it.
I like that they are improving usabillity. But this camera is getting long in thw tooth and the little tweaks to the x100t are no where near enough to warrant an upgrade from x100s. I wouldnt even upgrade from the first gen x100.
+1 from me too. This fetish people have for "full frame" is completely unnecessary. APS-C is more than adequate for everything that used to be done on 35mm film, including all editorial work and even some advertising and fashion.
IMHO, APS-C is the new 35mm and hi-res full frame (e.g. the Sony A7s and Nikon D800s) can reliably take the place of medium format in terms of image quality. Pretty much the only situations in which this doesn't hold true are where the particular look-and-feel of a long-focal-length lens is needed to simulate the look of a 6x6 or 5x4 shot, where the end use is a large, close-quarters billboard or where the pics will undergo heavy post-production.
You lug your full-frame bricks around and look like a dinosaur if you like; I'll carry my light, high-quality APSs and get the shot whle you're still changing lenses.
Saffron_Blaze: The winner highlights that fact that there is little truly wild in England. Excepting London, it is one giant farm.
Saffron, you know a "forest" in Britain doesn't necessarily include trees? Historically, it was simply the word for an area set aside for noblemen to hunt in, and thus was often mostly treeless (save for a few stands to give some cover for the game) to allow the horses free movement.
But I agree, there's not much left of them these days... :-(
<blockquote>The M-P Digital also features weather-sealing for protection against water and dust incursion...</blockquote>
About time! Now at last I can buy a Leica. Just as soon as my ship comes in... :-)
Deardorff: How does the touch screen work with gloves or mittens and 20 below zero temperatures?
On the subject of the touchscreen focusing not working with the EVF: presumably that could be fixed by having the position of one's finger (or, more likely, thumb) on the screen tracked by a marker in the EVF. Pressing the shutter would lock the focus on the current thumb position.
The point being that the issue is surely fixable in firmware, at any rate, even if not by that particular method.
quezra: How is making it so reliant on touchscreen in any way bold? Sony NEX-5N did it years ago. Samsung Galaxy NX did it the most recently. Even the upcoming Lytro camera is going to do it. I think DPR were desperate to say something nice about Leica, but honestly this isn't bold. It's a design choice that many have tried, and eventually rolled back in favor of more physical controls which a VF necessitates for tactile feedback.
OK, I give up. How *do* you do text formatting hereabouts?
As Barney says, it's bold <i>for Leica</i>. It also fits with Leica's design philosophy of longevity, inasmuch as it can be easily upgraded via firmware without either Leica or the customer having to replace the hardware. As it's basically just a (high-quality) shell with software and a lens on the front, Leica can go on banging these things out for years to come like they did their film cameras, without having to make major hardware revisions the way other manufacturers do, and yet frequently refresh and improve both new <i>and existing</i> cameras, possibly via paid-for upgrades.
Cost-effective from both Leica's and the customer's point of view.
Good move, I reckon.