James A Rinner

James A Rinner

Lives in United States Racine, United States
Works as a Inventor
Has a website at www.loukasmedical.com
Joined on Dec 13, 2003
About me:

James A. Rinner was born in 1955 and has been active in photography since 1960. A former professional photographer, he has shot over 1200 weddings (mostly free-lanced) and won five international awards in wedding photography. Because of travel for work he stopped shooting weddings in 1993, but has never stopped shooting. He is on his 9th (14th if you count the 5 E-10s I used to teach photography to the Boys Scouts) digital camera (Olympus OM-D EM-5) and loves it!

Olympus OM-D, E-PL1, 5 E-10s, E-20N, 7-14 Panny, 25mm 1.4, 50mm macro, 12-50mm, 14-42, M14-150, 75-300mm, 4/3 adapted 85mm 1.7 MD Rokkor-X, Nikkor 50 f2 M39, Nikkor 35mm F2.8 M39, FL-36, FL-50, Sunpack Ring Flash, Olympus C-7070, Olympus XZ-1, Bogen 3025 and 3001, both with ball heads and Manfrotto Carbon fiber CX190 Pro.

Comments

Total: 127, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
On New Moon in the Moonrise (Read the additional rules!) challenge (2 comments in total)

Nice shot! Thanks for entering the contest. I love the nice little slice of the moon!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2012 at 01:37 UTC as 2nd comment
On Moon Rising in the Moonrise (Read the additional rules!) challenge (2 comments in total)

From a former SoCal resident "Bravo!"

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2012 at 01:36 UTC as 2nd comment
On Moon Over the Ocean in the Moonrise (Read the additional rules!) challenge (3 comments in total)

This was one of my favorites! Thanks for entering.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2012 at 01:35 UTC as 2nd comment | 1 reply

Red, white and blue. Love it!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2012 at 01:35 UTC as 1st comment

This shot has great balance between the moon, trees, lake, reflections and stars. Thanks for entering.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2012 at 01:34 UTC as 1st comment
On Moon over Seal Rock in the Moonrise (Read the additional rules!) challenge (1 comment in total)

Great shot!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2012 at 01:32 UTC as 1st comment
On In trees in the Moonrise (Read the additional rules!) challenge (1 comment in total)

Awesome shot! Thanks for entering it!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2012 at 01:32 UTC as 1st comment
On Pelican Point Moonrise in the Moonrise (Read the additional rules!) challenge (2 comments in total)

Super photo! Thanks for entering!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2012 at 01:32 UTC as 2nd comment
On Moonrise Kingdom in the Moonrise (Read the additional rules!) challenge (5 comments in total)

Very nicely done! When I first saw this and saw the alpenglow on the mountains I expected to see it on the moon, but hten I said "Duh, the moon is lit by the sun only and the mountains by the sunlight through the atmosphere!"

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2012 at 01:31 UTC as 4th comment
On Oak moon silhouette in the Moonrise (Read the additional rules!) challenge (1 comment in total)

Very well done! Thanks for entering and congratulations!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2012 at 01:28 UTC as 1st comment
On Moonrise (Read the additional rules!) challenge (10 comments in total)

Well done everyone!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2012 at 01:28 UTC as 1st comment

Corel PaintShop Pro has been doing this for many many years!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 5, 2012 at 18:05 UTC as 11th comment | 1 reply
On Moonrise (Read the additional rules!) challenge (10 comments in total)
In reply to:

James A Rinner: I have had to disqualify some of the entries because but the rules state "no buldings". Post processing is allowed so you can re-submit the image after you remove the buildings.

Some have other man-made objects in them like chairs, street lights, lights on boats and fireworks. While these are not listed as "against the rules" these items may be looked at as not following the intent of the contest subject and may affect how people vote for your submission. If I were you I would remove the entry and re-submit it with these man-made items edited out.

You are right I should have said "all man-made objects", thus the reason for the very first comment after the first few entries were submitted. I thought the intent, which all challenges have and is not irrelevant, was pretty obvious (at least to me) as I explained above. I will continue to hone my challenges and want to thank you for driving me to do it!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 3, 2012 at 15:48 UTC
On Moonrise (Read the additional rules!) challenge (10 comments in total)
In reply to:

James A Rinner: I have had to disqualify some of the entries because but the rules state "no buldings". Post processing is allowed so you can re-submit the image after you remove the buildings.

Some have other man-made objects in them like chairs, street lights, lights on boats and fireworks. While these are not listed as "against the rules" these items may be looked at as not following the intent of the contest subject and may affect how people vote for your submission. If I were you I would remove the entry and re-submit it with these man-made items edited out.

I can see your point about drawing attention to some but the intent was the moon and natural surroundings. The series is Creation, which has to do with the non man-made objects, and the submitters should always look at the hosts sample photos which definately show my intent.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 3, 2012 at 14:39 UTC
On Moonrise (Read the additional rules!) challenge (10 comments in total)
In reply to:

James A Rinner: I have had to disqualify some of the entries because but the rules state "no buldings". Post processing is allowed so you can re-submit the image after you remove the buildings.

Some have other man-made objects in them like chairs, street lights, lights on boats and fireworks. While these are not listed as "against the rules" these items may be looked at as not following the intent of the contest subject and may affect how people vote for your submission. If I were you I would remove the entry and re-submit it with these man-made items edited out.

What is it with you that you always have to find fault with others. As I said earlier I was giving those with distracting items a chance to improve their picture. I have no problem with admitting my mistakes and I admitted that I did not do the best with this challenge. You, on the other hand, can't let something go as if you feel you are superior to all others. I am always trying to do better and hopefully my next Challenge that I am hosting (Lonely Leaf) is better still.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 2, 2012 at 23:48 UTC
On Moonrise (Read the additional rules!) challenge (10 comments in total)
In reply to:

James A Rinner: I have had to disqualify some of the entries because but the rules state "no buldings". Post processing is allowed so you can re-submit the image after you remove the buildings.

Some have other man-made objects in them like chairs, street lights, lights on boats and fireworks. While these are not listed as "against the rules" these items may be looked at as not following the intent of the contest subject and may affect how people vote for your submission. If I were you I would remove the entry and re-submit it with these man-made items edited out.

Dear Raptor,
I posted the comment above very early on. I think it is pretty clear what my intent was. All entrants that had some "extras" in their subissions will have close to seven days to withdraw, edit and re-submit their entry. On the contrary, I am not penalizing submitters, but helping them with their submission.

Have you hosted any challenges? Just when you think you have all the rules spelled out clearly there are those that submit something you did not think of. I really hate disqualifying images but it is part of the responsibility for being a host. In this challenge alone I have disqualified 14 images thus far that have buildings (some very small, but buildings none the less) in them.

Even though I study the rules very closely I myself have been disqualified because I missed something!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 1, 2012 at 21:20 UTC
On Symmetry in nature challenge (3 comments in total)

You contest filled up pretty quickly. How about increasing the number of entries?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 28, 2012 at 15:27 UTC as 3rd comment
On Moonrise (Read the additional rules!) challenge (10 comments in total)

I have had to disqualify some of the entries because but the rules state "no buldings". Post processing is allowed so you can re-submit the image after you remove the buildings.

Some have other man-made objects in them like chairs, street lights, lights on boats and fireworks. While these are not listed as "against the rules" these items may be looked at as not following the intent of the contest subject and may affect how people vote for your submission. If I were you I would remove the entry and re-submit it with these man-made items edited out.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 28, 2012 at 15:26 UTC as 2nd comment | 8 replies
In reply to:

PaulSnowcat: Those 4/3 lenses re just great. Maybe the best out there... But how many users still work with 4/3 system? They've scammed us with that E5, that actually was a E3Mk2, nothing more... And now they expect someone to come back? Well, a few would. But very few.

And of something is made for a very few ppl, that something will be VERY expensive I afraid ><

The E-5 was heads and tails over the E-3. The EM-5 did replace my E-5 so I could take more lenses and less bulk and weight with me where ever I go; day hike or into the back country!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 20, 2012 at 19:09 UTC
On Olympus OM-D E-M5 challenge (6 comments in total)
In reply to:

cosmoxl: The rules call for out of camera jpeg. What if we only have the raw file?

Same question here! What about raw images that were processed "as hot"?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 7, 2012 at 01:54 UTC
Total: 127, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »