tazmac

tazmac

Lives in Earth
Has a website at http://soundcloud.com/tazmac
Joined on Dec 25, 2012

Comments

Total: 39, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On Polaroid releases waterproof 16MP action camera post (17 comments in total)
In reply to:

monkeybrain: Why is this news on Connect? This is an action cam for stills and video and has nothing to do with mobile phones or tablets. It doesn't even have wifi so has pretty much nothing to do with 'connect'.

Same thing came to my mind...

Direct link | Posted on May 17, 2013 at 05:40 UTC

This guy is a C stand fanatic!

Direct link | Posted on May 9, 2013 at 05:48 UTC as 29th comment | 1 reply
On Photoshop CC: Adobe responds to reaction article (1879 comments in total)
In reply to:

Debankur Mukherjee: beware the Nazis are coming........

Nazi Zionist Jews!

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2013 at 12:08 UTC
On Photoshop CC: Adobe responds to reaction article (1879 comments in total)

No wonder ADBE went down...

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2013 at 08:20 UTC as 572nd comment
On Photoshop CC: Adobe responds to reaction article (1879 comments in total)

Thanks god they not going the subscription method with lightroom..

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2013 at 05:58 UTC as 633rd comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Andreas Stuebs: Regrettably the SNL footage cannot be viewed outside USA

merica

Direct link | Posted on May 7, 2013 at 20:15 UTC
On Flying Penguins: Photography in Antarctica article (43 comments in total)

Nice one!

Direct link | Posted on May 7, 2013 at 19:48 UTC as 28th comment
In reply to:

tazmac: binsearch is your friend! Get the CS6 Master Collection!

when a company has a monopoly over a certain market, what is their incentive to lower their profits? being charitable individuals? but think of the shareholders, the company has a duty to them first and foremost. if piracy dropped to 0% today, do you think Adobe would cut its prices in half tomorrow, because they can still make a profit? the market is driven by supply and demand, and as long as the demand is high, the price will be high.

and CEO bonuses don't appear out of thin air, someone has to fork the money for those. guess who that is.

Exactly!!

Direct link | Posted on May 7, 2013 at 10:06 UTC
In reply to:

tazmac: binsearch is your friend! Get the CS6 Master Collection!

Karma is a bitch!

Direct link | Posted on May 7, 2013 at 08:57 UTC

binsearch is your friend! Get the CS6 Master Collection!

Direct link | Posted on May 7, 2013 at 08:15 UTC as 384th comment | 14 replies
On More pictures leak of purported Olympus PEN 'E-P5' article (237 comments in total)

Looks like dpreview is changing! The first time I see leaked product before it's announced..

Direct link | Posted on May 3, 2013 at 06:36 UTC as 61st comment | 2 replies
On Just Posted: Fujifilm X20 review article (175 comments in total)
In reply to:

Everlast66: How can this come so close to the mighty RX100? - 77% vs 78%
And why can it not be compared to the RX100? they are the same category and similar price ranges

RX100 Corners are soft... Check the studio comparison picture!

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2013 at 09:10 UTC
On Just Posted: Fujifilm X20 review article (175 comments in total)
In reply to:

playForever8: dpreview rating system is quite messed up. I just don't understand how the 77% points come up for X20.

If comparing X20 against Nikon J1. They are in the same price range(even considering J1 price 2 years ago, now J1 is half of the initial list price).

J1 has bigger sensor 1" vs 2/3"
J1 has much faster AF, especially continuous AF system.
J1 has better video quality.
J1 better picture quality at low ISO and high ISO with its default kit lens.
J1 is half of X20 price now

J1 only got 67% rating. What a joke!

Based on X20 current price, X20 should be compared against J3(same price range), which has faster AF, higher MP than J1. I am not sure when J3 is reviewed by dpreview. what the rating will be given to J3 ? Shouldn't be well above 80% if X20 got 77% now.

How's the viewfinder on the J1?

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2013 at 07:34 UTC
On Just Posted: Fujifilm X20 review article (175 comments in total)
In reply to:

RichRMA: I don't know. Go to the RAW comparison studio shot. Replace the Olympus P&S there with an OM-D, or any cheap DSLR. They just clobber these P&S's, even at 100 ISO there is noticeably better resolution. With used NEX-3's and 5's going for $250-$350, or (like I saw the other day) a Panasonic G3 open box with lens for $275, I'd be hard-pressed to spend $599 on a P&S.

Your money!

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2013 at 07:32 UTC
On Just Posted: Fujifilm X20 review article (175 comments in total)
In reply to:

nathondetroit: Brilliant job with the noise reduction samples! It definitely gave a great impression of what JPEG shooters will need to tweak as they use this camera. I was worried, but the -2 NR shots were quite crispy in relation to the apocalypse-level fear spreading around the forums.

Shoot in RAW... That's the only setting you need!

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2013 at 07:30 UTC

1/1.7-inch large High Sensitivity MOS Sensor??? F5.9???? NO!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 24, 2013 at 05:30 UTC as 65th comment | 2 replies
On You'll have to wait a "year-ish" for Google Glass post (76 comments in total)

No thanks!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 23, 2013 at 17:22 UTC as 38th comment | 1 reply

People try to make money here while make you look stupid...

Direct link | Posted on Apr 23, 2013 at 06:37 UTC as 14th comment
On Odd Ball in the Tiny Things challenge (18 comments in total)

This is just so masonic!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 18, 2013 at 12:43 UTC as 4th comment | 1 reply

Well done Sigma!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 18, 2013 at 12:42 UTC as 104th comment
Total: 39, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »