marianco

Lives in United States Monterey, CA, United States
Works as a Physician, Psychiatrist
Joined on Feb 15, 2003

Comments

Total: 37, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »

These are pretty uninspiring photos. They look cartoonish rather than realistic.

Why would anyone want to buy the Panasonic if this is the best you can do?

I wouldn't.

Link | Posted on Sep 26, 2015 at 09:12 UTC as 4th comment
On article DxO ONE real-world sample gallery (185 comments in total)

These are bad, dark, low dynamic range, bland, uninspiring photos.

The photos immediately convinced me to NOT buy the DXO ONE Camera.

I would rather carry a Sony RX100 II camera with me.
1. It would be much quicker to use for candid photos
2. It allows external flash to improve people photos and to improve lighting of the dark portions of the photos.
3. It has the same resolution as the DXO ONE Camera. I
4. It is as easily pocketed as the DOX ONE Camera.

I would also rather use an iPhone 6S PLUS for photography since at 12 megapixels, it would do a better job than the DXO ONE.

Link | Posted on Sep 25, 2015 at 16:14 UTC as 12th comment | 7 replies
In reply to:

Nick Pisani: Well I am a "Johnny come lately!". Not being especially computer literate and older (73) I finally got around iPhoto (which I knew I would). I then wanted to progress into "Aperture. and what happens is Apple ups & discontinues Aperture. From all reports then "new" Apple Photo's" program is not for me. I am interested in of course saving my photo's in the usual way, but also doing some limited corrections with my Wacum pad. That is some facial smoothing, removing a telephone line, etc.
I read that the new Photo's software was being geared for cell phone photography and not much else.
I also heard that Adobe's Lightroom was not a good choice for an Aperture replacement. Looking at amazon, prices & configurations seem to go all over the place.
Guys like us need a article or email (clickitnick@icloud) touting the software that would be a good next step after "iPhoto".

Adobe Lightroom is a great replacement for Aperture. Even Apple recommends using it as a replacement.

I was shocked and pleased that Adobe cloned so much of the Aperture workflow that the latest Lightroom is nearly a drop-in replacement for Aperture. Of course it is much more sophisticated as well. It was competition from Apple's Aperture that drove Adobe shitless into greatly improving Lightroom.

Link | Posted on Apr 18, 2015 at 15:45 UTC

AARGGGG. Photos is inadequate. The worse part is that your photos a trapped in its library. You cannot edit them in another app like with PHOTOS for the iPhone. I think Photos will mature and more features will come in to allow editing in other apps.

Apple IS A BRAND FOR PROFESSIONAL USE. However, for Apple is also a company of EXTREME FOCUS. Apple generally will only create a product only if it can do better than the competition.

For example, when it comes to pro video software, there is NOTHING BETTER THAN FINAL CUT PRO. And Apple continues to go whole hog in supporting it.

When it comes to professional photography apps, Apple has decided that it cannot do better than the competition - which is Adobe. Adobe - scared shitless - competed well against Apple's Aperture. And Apple acknowledged Adobe's win. Adobe even cloned the Aperture workflow so much the newest Lightroom acts like Aperture compared with old versions of LR. I was shocked and pleased.

Link | Posted on Apr 18, 2015 at 15:40 UTC as 106th comment | 3 replies

So is this the end for Minolta-Sony cameras?

Link | Posted on Feb 28, 2015 at 19:58 UTC as 3rd comment

1. M3 ergonomics are much better than with the M2 and M1
2. Wi-Fi = instant sharing of photos with your kids, friends, facebook via your iPhone
3. Wi-Fi = remote control via your iPhone
4. 6X autofocus speed of the M1
5. Flip Screen for more creative photos and selfies
6. Full HD Video
7. Digic-6 processing for much lower noise.

The M3 is a huge upgrade to the M2 and M1.

Luckily, despite not being sold in the US, we can buy it through eBay!

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2015 at 18:12 UTC as 16th comment
On article Hands-on with Canon's 'not-coming-to-USA' EOS M3 (598 comments in total)

eBay!

Link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 07:02 UTC as 159th comment
On article Relio is a powerful LED light in your pocket (26 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wubslin: Oooooh, a portable white LED. Amazing.

No-one has ever thought of such a thing before.

You can get cheap ones from Walmart.

Link | Posted on Dec 12, 2014 at 09:16 UTC

I wish Canon would do something like this.

Link | Posted on Jan 12, 2014 at 05:18 UTC as 5th comment
In reply to:

mike winslow: geez its so tiring to listen to photographers who think that they are artists.. So what if you know where to stand.. I knew Renoir, he was a friend of mine, and you sir, are no Renoir lol..

Stated while wearing a straitjacket in a rubber room.

Link | Posted on Aug 24, 2013 at 17:43 UTC
In reply to:

Sam The Man: proves Professional Walmart Associate = Professional Photographer

Not really. There was no mention that a Professional Walmart Associate is a professional photographer. Thus, there is no proof of that assertion.

Link | Posted on Aug 24, 2013 at 17:42 UTC

I prefer Eric Thayer's photos.
But Joshua Lott's are also excellent.

Link | Posted on Aug 24, 2013 at 17:41 UTC as 10th comment
In reply to:

fuego6: Get rid of that hand in the photo... any amateur would have cropped/healed it out... geesh.. really?

The hand is deliberately part of the photo. If you don't realize that, you are truly a noobie rank amateur.

Link | Posted on Aug 24, 2013 at 17:39 UTC

Nah. The biggest problem with the thought of Android dominating cameras is that age-old photography adage: the best camera is the one you carry with you.

The reason the iPhone is such a dominant camera is that you always carry your iPhone with you. You never leave it at home.

The Android smart camera is NOT a cell phone. Thus it is an option not a need to carry. It also is another thing to lug around one's pocket or purse. It adds complexity to a camera. The iPhone on the other hand is dead simple to use as a camera - anyone can use it. Android smart cameras also take a LONG-TIME to start up. They are not that handy when trying to take spontaneous pictures.

Nah. The iPhone (and other iOS devices) will continue to dominate particularly as Apple improves their optics. Imagine having a zoom camera on the iPhone with a bended light path (like used on Sony T-series pocket cameras). That would kill whatever is left of the small camera market.

Link | Posted on Feb 1, 2013 at 14:37 UTC as 11th comment | 3 replies
Total: 37, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »