I have two Minolta 50F1.7 that I use on my a7II with an LAEA4, often used at F2. Has all the sharpness and micro-contrast I need. something to keep in mind considering that these Mnoltas can be had for $50CDN each (or less).http://elementalview.blogspot.ca/2016/03/sony-diaries-931-claireberkeley.html
If it's anything like the Sigma 24F1.8 (ART-like in quality but not in price) for FF frame, it'll be a great lens.
nananananana: none of the ppl in the pictures look even remotely underage
life on the streets will age anybody prematurely
dodgebaena: I too am not a Pentax shooter but I know friends who swear by Pentax, and have heard glowing testimonials. What I don't understand is why more manufacturers don't incorporate an articulating/tilting/swiveling LCD. After I used one with the Canon 60D (I'm now a Sony a99/a7II/RX10 shooter), I can't see myself shooting without one.
one also needs to have a weather-sealed lens…most people will buy into the weather-sealing tag just to know that it's there, just in case. If I had a Porsche, it's nice to know I can get it to 240kph without much effort. Almost all the time, I'll be doing 120kph, tops. Questionable or not, unless one does jobs in the Amazon rainforest or similar, weather sealing is most likely not a deal-breaker. If you want 110% weather sealing, get an underwater housing.
KL Matt: No built in flash is a bummer for triggering an off-camera flash without having to lug around a second one. Also, I use mine for fill in daylight backlit people shots infrequently, and it's really handy to be able to just pop it up. Plenty of power for that purpose. The GPS would be way cool to have, but what will turning it on do to battery power? In any case, this camera will likely bring down the price of the K3, which is probably where I'm headed now that the K5 IIs is no longer available for a reasonable price (missed my window of opportunity there).
built-in flash and an articulating/tilting/swiveling LCDare must-haves for me.
I too am not a Pentax shooter but I know friends who swear by Pentax, and have heard glowing testimonials. What I don't understand is why more manufacturers don't incorporate an articulating/tilting/swiveling LCD. After I used one with the Canon 60D (I'm now a Sony a99/a7II/RX10 shooter), I can't see myself shooting without one.
peterstuckings: I love the writer's enthusiasm. "If we buy into the idea that photography is about the 'Decisive Moment', what are the implications when we gain the ability to capture all the moments in the scene?" Well, my friend, it's the decisive moment precisely because it's the one the photographer captured. In any series of movements, there can be multiple choices. So what if you have 10,000 frames to choose from instead of 3, of which one is obviously the moment you hoped for? This is not photography, it is selecting a frame from video by spending more time at a computer than shooting. This is a video camera, and I'm pleased for video people they have yet another excellent tool for their work. Meaningless for photography as yet...
I was being sarcastic :-)
by the same token, a well-placed sniper's bullet does the same trick as spraying a whole magazine... so I guess you have a point.
Here's an obvious question for Sony and Panasonic:Why not use the same form factor as this XC10 and put in the heart/brains of either a GH4 or an A7S? And whats with the use of the letter X? There are 25 other letters to use.Sometimes, "convergence" is all a big CON.
Lucas_: The A7Ii is such a wonderful and groundbreaking camera, that DPR had to dig out something like "high ISO noise" to not give it another gold to Sony...! Since I bought it my excellent A99 startedto see a lot of som shelf time. I believe DPR is also mistaken when saying that the sensor is the same as in the A7. This review seems to have been done in a hurry and under a lot of pressure from canikon, etc... Nevertheless, most everybody knows now that Sony sensors are by far the best out there. I feel positive now that the "new" 50MP Canons will get the gold...!
I'm with you Lucas… my a99 will be seeing some shelf time soon. Last week, the only reason I used my a99 was because my Tamron 70-200f2.8alpha didn't work with the LA EA4. The A7II has to be seen and used to be believed.
magneto shot: FF and we'll talk. Not because apsc quality is lacking, but because there is nothing negligible about crop factor in focal lengths. Mirrorless is crowded now but FF mirrorless is pretty much just sony
I wonder if Stats are available that'll show the number of people who go FF after wishing for FF. I want an Audi too but I'm very happy with my Nissan.
justinwonnacott: so tired of non existent kickstarter ideas . . . show me the one you have wrapped and ready to go or get off my doorstep.
my hardware store sells a similar item at its checkout counter for $5. And I can use it on my bike. I heard today that somebody paid a few thousand dollars for a bag of air from a Kanye west concert. I guess one can raise 10,000 $1's on the internet.
the Comments range from the naive to the ignorant, with a few wise, learned ones thrown in to tease me into reading further down. It's too bad that the price of entry into this forum is just an email address.
looks like a more-rounded NEX camera to me. Reinventing the wheel.
dodgebaena: I'm getting a boner with this one…. the IS seals the deal for me. Basically, I want a mirrorless version of the a99, and with the IS, my dream is fulfilled.
I'm the only one in my circle of wedding photographers here in TO who uses the Sony a99. Now it looks like I'l be using the A72 next year.
vesa1tahti: No time lapse, no bulb = useless
Bulb is for exposures longer than the 30sec "minimum". DPR's review may be incorrect if they say there is no Bulb setting. Bulb is a must-have.
I'm getting a boner with this one…. the IS seals the deal for me. Basically, I want a mirrorless version of the a99, and with the IS, my dream is fulfilled.
when the howling mob takes over the presidential palace, this will be one of the items found
(unknown member): The RX10 (which I have owned for several months) is a very, very good video camera. The still images are good but the video is great and the ability to have a lens that's par focal (that doesn't change focus as you zoom) and constant aperture (doesn't change aperture as you zoom) means that you can use this camera for serious video production.
It's different than all those cameras listed below because it doesn't do line skipping in video it reads out the whole frame. This makes its final video output much sharper and more detailed than any of those. It's worth the cash IF you do video with it. Zebras, focus peaking, audio control. It's just a nearly perfect budget video machine. That's why people buy it.
Hi Kirk,Your opinion seals the deal for me: I will be getting the RX10. The video from my a99 is a you say, "mush" and it's a pain esp when I am combining it with clips from my Sony NX30.