PIX 2015
Jeff Greenberg

Jeff Greenberg

Works as a full time stock shooter since July 1988
Joined on Jan 21, 2003

Comments

Total: 49, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
On The travel photography of HDR guru Trey Ratcliff article (233 comments in total)

I searched for reported usages by major media & came up empty:
(except circular references)

https://www.google.com/search?num=50&q=Trey+Ratcliff+ABC+CBS+FOX+BBC+NBC&oq=Trey+Ratcliff+ABC+CBS+FOX+BBC+NBC

Can somebody clarify????!!!
Does DPR fact-check for these features?
And not allow themselves to become another circular reference...

Direct link | Posted on Aug 11, 2015 at 00:11 UTC as 21st comment
On 16bDan_ISO6400_76mm-ACR photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (5 comments in total)

> Luminance Noise Reduction +25

Really? ISO 6400!!!?

Try +50 to +60...

Direct link | Posted on Aug 3, 2015 at 22:24 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply
On photo in sample gallery (5 comments in total)

> Luminance Noise Reduction +25

Really? ISO 6400!!!?

Try +50 to +60...

Direct link | Posted on Aug 3, 2015 at 22:24 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply
On photo in sample gallery (5 comments in total)

> Luminance Noise Reduction +25

Really? ISO 6400!!!?

Try +50 to +60...

Direct link | Posted on Aug 3, 2015 at 22:24 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply

How about RX10 vs. RX10II "stills" showdown???
Head-to-head.
Same compositions.
Same settings.
No owners are reporting this in datail on forums...
Or if they have -- link please!!!!!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 3, 2015 at 22:16 UTC as 19th comment | 1 reply

Forget press pass.
Buy ticket.
Be "fan" with hand-size camera.
Or even smartphone.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 15, 2015 at 04:04 UTC as 37th comment

This is why a lot of good shooters never go on to
become pros -- they give their work away for the thrill
of a credit line & don't treat it as worthy of income...

Direct link | Posted on Apr 5, 2015 at 19:46 UTC as 3rd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Jeff Greenberg: Eventually:
nano-BlackHoles offering
noiseless crystal clarity,
f/0, ISO 1B

Quoting ecube:

"f/0 is physically impossible."
"I am of course over simplifying and most likely misinformed."

Study up on black holes.
The laws of physics break down...

Direct link | Posted on Mar 31, 2015 at 16:09 UTC

I'm interested in releasing the world's first
public domain collection of Gambia images.
Will crowdfunding subsidize my business
class airfare r.t., 4 star hotel (is there one
in Gambia?) one week stay, all meals,
& post-visit processing expenses**...?
(**otherwise known as income)

And please post other kinds of
crowdfunding "hacks"....
new car, wardrobe, lifestyle upgrades, etc.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 26, 2015 at 14:09 UTC as 5th comment

This is great news for those that make a
living licensing stock macro photos of insects...

Direct link | Posted on Mar 26, 2015 at 00:54 UTC as 8th comment | 8 replies

Eventually:
nano-BlackHoles offering
noiseless crystal clarity,
f/0, ISO 1B

Direct link | Posted on Mar 15, 2015 at 21:30 UTC as 5th comment | 3 replies

> Skeptics have speculated that the sale is nothing more than a marketing tactic

There are about 3 consultants, 3 galleries, 3 auction houses
worldwide that almost all high end collectors follow for
advice on what to buy.

Any "rogue" collector can do what they want with
their $$ but they are a lot less likely to influence
other significant collectors' buying activities...

Direct link | Posted on Dec 12, 2014 at 18:14 UTC as 88th comment
On Rare Canon EF 1200mm f/5.6L USM goes on sale in UK article (218 comments in total)

> This lens is really a joke...

But has it gone up in value as collectible???
About year ago I read my Canon 50mm f1.0
is still worth (ignoring devalued dollar) what
I paid "used" for it ~1999, about $2K...

Direct link | Posted on Aug 26, 2014 at 22:30 UTC as 2nd comment

What about Harvard?
What are they offering free?
Does the University of Albania offer a photography degree?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 19, 2014 at 20:02 UTC as 9th comment

Clever.
Like some microstock.
Or Getty commercial.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 15, 2014 at 02:35 UTC as 47th comment
On Walmart sues photographer's widow over family pictures article (166 comments in total)

If nothing exists that specifically states a copyright transfer
then AFAIK copyright stays with shooter...

Direct link | Posted on May 22, 2014 at 22:10 UTC as 15th comment | 1 reply
On Getty and Flickr to cease partnership article (19 comments in total)

If Getty licensed enough of your flickr images to allow you
to quit your day job & shoot stock full time, raise your hand...
How about enough to buy a very large memory card...?
A Happy Meal???

Direct link | Posted on Mar 11, 2014 at 10:27 UTC as 8th comment | 2 replies

Its $175 net Royalty Free, right?
Yeah, that's going to be appealing
to anyone NOT full time stock shooter.
They will get occasional thrill of licensing
& never know they have KILLED their
chances of being full time self employed
stock shooter making reasonable income.
And despite the ambient moaning that
stock no longer provides reasonable income,
some ARE still achieving reasonable income,
some well above their nation average incomes...

Direct link | Posted on Mar 9, 2014 at 13:20 UTC as 15th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

dantome: Photography should move an emotion, and these images do, if you like you do, if you don't you don't. But the negative comments I don't get, those of you who continue to nock these images put you're work up, lets see what you can do, I am sure you can't, thats why you knock. Every photographer has a style, and she has developed her style.

If you can't do, just shut up.

Critics of contemporary photography have no effect
on pricing. Those who buy it as investment depend
on branded galleries & dealers for advice-direction.

Criticism back & forth between hobbyists is...a hobby.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 28, 2014 at 20:49 UTC
On Wyoming's stunning weather and landscapes in time-lapse article (231 comments in total)

Snow scene with footprints arranged?

I don't know video but it led me to wonder:
what about series of scenes, snow, sand,
wet rock, etc., in which each footprint
is seen to be made by "invisible" person & each scene
relates to next to create one long "walk" through WY
or wherever...?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 15, 2014 at 20:32 UTC as 68th comment | 1 reply
Total: 49, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »