PG Thomas: Nice to see - but I would have preferred a F2.8, like the 14mm, and possibly half the size (and price).
I struggle to see the advantage of sub F2 lenses at this focal length on, what should be a small light camera system. There's not a great deal of differential focus between F1.4 and F2 or F2.8 below 20mm, provided the lens is sharp wide open - which the Fujinons I have, all are.
Still, If I had the cash, I'd be considering it...
Fuji already has a 14 mm 2.8 lens
Doesn't it have 120 fps at 720p video recording?
looks cool on paper!
Arhat: I have found this much more impressive than the winning picture.
Markintosh: Another "pearl" from this author. How you can compare pixel count of FF and crop camera?DPR articles are degrading more and more:(((
side by side :)
Nikon D750 Black Dot Edition!
CameraLabTester: Nikon is a good company with good products.
Hopefully, there won't be a time when they have to explain why they disappeared from the planet, entirely.
You are here to explain us why ;)
f 4.5-6.7 must be a joke!
turbsy: I will believe it when I see it.
figure what out? xD
LOL Barney :D
Xentinus: They have sold faulty cameras,but gracious Nikon has decided to make a favor to its customer.So,they must be happy?!HowaboutTHAT?
.....Obviously very hard for you to understand my point.The point is very simple.Nikon is not making a favour to its customers by fixing the FAULTY cameras free.This is what Nikon supposed to actually do.In addition to this,Nikon (and other brands too) should give enough importance to its quality control department.***Would you buy a refurbished camera for the same price as new?***
And please stop answering my rhetorical questions ;)
RAW:"As I have explained you misused a term, and it’s kind of a constant refrain from Nikon haters here."
You could not explain anything.You actually have contradictions with your OWN words...You were just "blah blah blah".And who the hell you are,deciding what terms people can use?...Who the hell you are,judging people being hater just because they are criticizing brands' mistakes?What if I say "how much Nikon pays for you defending them here"
Of course Nikon wouldn't say "Canon does it,too".I was sarcastic with RAW...A,B and C are what exactly he/she has said several times here.Even Nikon admitted the issue,he is still like "Canon also has the same FAULT" under almost every comment which criticizes Nikon.
HARAW:So If you were CEO of Nikon,you would handle the problem(fault,issue,trouble...) like;A-Canon also has the same problemB-Avoid that certain scenesC-What are you talking about,everything is fineD-Nikon D760...coming soonE-Lets wait till China says something...:)
To be honest;I hesitated at first,then I prefered to say "faulty"...Actually doesn't matter.But while you are like "...several Canons have the SAME FAULT",that means Nikon has the same FAULT too...So If something has fault,you can define it as "faulty".By the way,I wouldn't define myself with others' mistakes...Im glad Nikon didn't dare to say "hey Canon also has problems".
They have sold faulty cameras,but gracious Nikon has decided to make a favor to its customer.So,they must be happy?!HowaboutTHAT?
A question for those,who think it is unfair voting gears they have never had;How did you make your final decision before purchasing your gears,did you try ALL cameras and lenses?We buy something over other things,because we think it is better than its rivals (considering value performance sometimes).
While criticizing a camera,which we have never even touched (for example Canon 7D II),what is wrong with voting?!We are reading the reviews,checking out tons of photos etc. and finally we criticize a camera or lens...We also make decision to buy or not to buy a camera.I don't say;there is no fan boys or brand basher,but some of us have objective viewpoint.Beside everything;DPR is asking us our opinions but we say "no...we don't own those cameras"...Could you please tell me,is there anyone who has all those cameras?