SETI

Lives in Russian Federation Velikiy Novgorod, Russian Federation
Works as a Photographer
Has a website at http://500px.com/krasitsky
Joined on Apr 26, 2007

Comments

Total: 145, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

SETI: Not as good as Canon 24-70mm mkII

Too much words, too much for a photographer.

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2016 at 22:48 UTC
In reply to:

damian5000: Why do people fund these things... Especially an already established company... It seems like one huge scam. I could see if it was a struggling entrepreneur trying to get their feet off the ground...

It just works. No need to risk =) New business model. You pay for our crazy ideas

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2016 at 22:46 UTC
In reply to:

SETI: Not as good as Canon 24-70mm mkII

andrewD2: Ok. Got your opinion. But I'd prefer FF Canon that can run on one battery all the wedding, doing great shots in near full darkness, and with amazing 24-70mm MkII. I'll add this: «it's MY opinion». Is that ok? =)

Link | Posted on Apr 7, 2016 at 20:53 UTC
In reply to:

SETI: Not as good as Canon 24-70mm mkII

Rishi Sanyal: If I can't make my opinion from your galleries so what all they for?

Link | Posted on Apr 6, 2016 at 21:36 UTC
In reply to:

SETI: Not as good as Canon 24-70mm mkII

andrewD2: Read your comments and think you're more engineer than a photographer. Field curvature? CA? What about photography?

Link | Posted on Apr 6, 2016 at 21:33 UTC

Not as good as Canon 24-70mm mkII

Link | Posted on Apr 1, 2016 at 13:13 UTC as 31st comment | 16 replies
In reply to:

Frank: Great - now they have the reason to continue the no update strategy.
they bought it for snapseed and killed one of the best plugins in the photography world. I would happily pay 500$ again for it, if it was still in development.

Nobody sees that they are killing it. Free in this case is dead.

That's typical «big company» tactics. Same as big supermarket with chemical foods kills small family shops

Link | Posted on Mar 25, 2016 at 00:32 UTC
On article Leica Q In-depth Review (1111 comments in total)

That could be a great challenge at 1-st April to post that gallery with erased exif, named «New Canon mirrorless» =)

Link | Posted on Mar 23, 2016 at 21:37 UTC as 150th comment
In reply to:

Arkienkeli: Quick comparison:

Leica SL with 24-90 (f/2.8-4) and this 90-280 zoom: total price about $18800 and weight 3.84 kg

Fujifilm X-T1 with 16-55mm (f/2.8 all the way) and 50-200mm zooms: $2500 and 1.68 kg.

Short zoom is faster on Fuji, longer slower. Resolutions now 24 and 16 MPix, but 24 MPix X-T2 coming soon. So basically one is paying 7.5 times more to carry 2.3 times more weight for basically same IQ.

@brendon1000 – if you value IQ so go buy Pentax 645Z camera for less price =) Don't waste your time and skill with Leica crop =)

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2016 at 11:27 UTC
On article CP+ 2016: Hands-on with new Panasonic lenses and ZS100 (103 comments in total)

ZS-100 looks smaller than new Nikon. 1:0

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2016 at 09:51 UTC as 15th comment
On article Newly enthused: hands on with the Canon EOS 80D (706 comments in total)
In reply to:

jbancroft1957: I've come close to buying the 70D several times but the rear control dial has put me off on each occasion as it doesn't feel easy/pleasant to use. YMMV.

I'm enthused by the 80D but the design of the rear dial appears unchanged?

Wait a year or less and you will come close to buying the 90D

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 15:52 UTC
In reply to:

JurijTurnsek: Why bother producing the non-VR version? Does this mean that low range Dx bodies will get the lesser kit lens and the mid rangers will get the VR version?

It's all about economy

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 10:31 UTC
In reply to:

Chris Yates: Kinda pricey for a Chinese brand.

What's not Chinese today? =)

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2015 at 01:27 UTC
On article Canon EOS M3 real-world samples (152 comments in total)
In reply to:

SETI: Noisy, soft... even my 1st version of OM-D E-M5 produce much better pictures. IMHO

And Olympus makes better pictures than Canon 7D =)

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2015 at 20:57 UTC
On article Canon EOS M3 real-world samples (152 comments in total)

Noisy, soft... even my 1st version of OM-D E-M5 produce much better pictures. IMHO

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2015 at 20:02 UTC as 72nd comment | 2 replies
On article Holga Digital camera project launched on Kickstarter (150 comments in total)

OMG

Link | Posted on Aug 31, 2015 at 19:13 UTC as 72nd comment
On a photo in the Sony Alpha 7R II Samples Gallery sample gallery (3 comments in total)
In reply to:

SETI: Why so much grain?!

Thanks!

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2015 at 23:11 UTC
On photo a7RII-RS-DSC08713-ISO_100 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (2 comments in total)

Why so much grain?!

Link | Posted on Aug 7, 2015 at 14:28 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply
On SampleImage:8339537989 (2 comments in total)

Why so much grain?!

Posted on Aug 7, 2015 at 14:28 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply
On a photo in the Sony Alpha 7R II Samples Gallery sample gallery (3 comments in total)

Why so much grain?!

Link | Posted on Aug 7, 2015 at 14:28 UTC as 1st comment | 2 replies
Total: 145, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »