pc168

pc168

Lives in Hong Kong Hong Kong
Joined on Mar 31, 2004

Comments

Total: 67, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
In reply to:

jerry367: Price is great, but too heavy for me.

Size does matter! A bit disappointed.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 29, 2013 at 03:34 UTC
In reply to:

TruePoindexter: I've investigated some of the extremely low prices people have been linking for the Canon 24-105 f/4 L and have discovered that these lenses have been pulled from combo packages of Canon 6D and 5DmkIII cameras and as such almost certainly will not be covered under warranty by Canon. Buy these at your own risk.

From legitimate retailers this Sigma 24-105 f/4 lens represents a significant price savings over the Canon/Nikon equivalents and will be a compelling lens if it performs.

Of course it was akin to buying used. The original purchaser sold you the kit lens only. And he/she gave you a copy of the legitimate retailer receipt. As such, I think the warranty should be fine.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 29, 2013 at 03:29 UTC
In reply to:

Joe Ogiba: I guess if Sigma does not come out with an E mount version with IS I will just get the Vario-Tessar T* FE 24-70mm F4 ZA OSS for my VG900.

82mm filter, 800+ grams. Too big for almost everyone!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 28, 2013 at 01:24 UTC
On Nikon adds Speedlight SB-300 flashgun to its arsenal article (46 comments in total)

It's cute! Should I get one ... though I already have the Metz 44 AF-1 for my D700

Direct link | Posted on Aug 6, 2013 at 13:39 UTC as 19th comment
On Nikkor 18-140mm F3.5-5.6G ED VR hints at mid-range DSLR article (191 comments in total)
In reply to:

pc168: No offense, lens without a distance meter is a bit ugly

message received :)

Direct link | Posted on Aug 6, 2013 at 10:03 UTC
On Nikkor 18-140mm F3.5-5.6G ED VR hints at mid-range DSLR article (191 comments in total)

No offense, lens without a distance meter is a bit ugly

Direct link | Posted on Aug 6, 2013 at 08:42 UTC as 73rd comment | 2 replies

Sigma is pretty impressive, though it's not my cup of tea. I need FF lens :)

Direct link | Posted on Apr 22, 2013 at 11:07 UTC as 28th comment | 3 replies
On Just posted: Sony Alpha NEX-6 Review article (330 comments in total)

So many NEX bodies, so confused. Can they make things simpler, straight forward ... may be just two NEX product lines, pro and amateur. And one model per line.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 27, 2013 at 14:46 UTC as 27th comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

TimK5: No VR on the 18-35?

= Fail!

Well, VR is almost a must have feature

Direct link | Posted on Jan 29, 2013 at 15:44 UTC

18-35 FX looks good. If I'm not having the 16-35 VR ... may give it a shot.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 29, 2013 at 07:58 UTC as 32nd comment
In reply to:

pc168: Ugly or not, it's pretty subjective. I believe, many of the Nikon 1 existing and/or potential users, are having a bunch of Nikkors. While the D700 is way too heavy, I'm looking for a smaller form factor body for travel. Let see how good the IQ and high ISO control would perform.

Well, sensor size does matter. Otherwise I would have already bought the V1 a year ago.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 25, 2012 at 12:41 UTC

Ugly or not, it's pretty subjective. I believe, many of the Nikon 1 existing and/or potential users, are having a bunch of Nikkors. While the D700 is way too heavy, I'm looking for a smaller form factor body for travel. Let see how good the IQ and high ISO control would perform.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 25, 2012 at 04:59 UTC as 45th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

pc168: The IQ at base ISO is excellent for such a small sensor. However, high ISO performance is steps behind its rivals. That is unforgivable in nowadays technology.

Plan B is to enhance and enforce plan A.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 15, 2012 at 08:36 UTC

The base iso performance should be good enough. Anyway, my Samsung fridge is great, it has an outer metallic cover ... same as the nx210 :)

Direct link | Posted on Aug 15, 2012 at 08:25 UTC as 26th comment

The IQ at base ISO is excellent for such a small sensor. However, high ISO performance is steps behind its rivals. That is unforgivable in nowadays technology.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 10, 2012 at 02:54 UTC as 28th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

tkbslc: What they really needed was more pancake primes and faster apertures. Not a slimmer kit lens and a body re-work.

People need a pancake zoom like the pana X 14-42 but w/o the infamous 1/60-1/160 shutter speed deadzone blurry pic problem :)

Direct link | Posted on Aug 10, 2012 at 02:45 UTC
In reply to:

nguyenthanhhieuthanson: why not 20 megapixel
why not APS-C sensor

For APS-C sensor, we've to go for their D3200. That's what they want!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 9, 2012 at 04:41 UTC

It seems all or most of the reviewers over the net are using version 0.2. So, they're getting the first batch of production version 1?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 28, 2012 at 09:55 UTC as 51st comment
On Updated: our Canon EOS M hands-on preview article (162 comments in total)

I would just emphasize on IQ and high ISO performance for the time being. If both are good, then the EOS-M is good to go.

ps. I'm a Nikon DSLR user, what a pity!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 25, 2012 at 10:45 UTC as 26th comment
In reply to:

Jun2: These lenses look like SONY

Ugly. In terms of finishing, Pan's 14-42 X is the best looking kit lens.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 06:32 UTC
Total: 67, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »