pc168

Sigma is pretty impressive, though it's not my cup of tea. I need FF lens :)

So many NEX bodies, so confused. Can they make things simpler, straight forward ...

So many NEX bodies, so confused. Can they make things simpler, straight forward ... may be just two NEX product line, pro and amateur. And one model per line.

So many NEX bodies, so confused. Can they make things simpler, straight forward ... may be just two NEX product lines, pro and amateur. And one model per line.

Well, VR is almost a must have feature

18-35 FX looks good. If I'm not having the 16-35 VR ... may give it a shot.

Well, sensor size does matter. Otherwise I would have already bought the V1 a year ago.

Ugly or not, it's pretty subjective. I believe, many of the Nikon 1 existing and/or potential users, are having a bunch of Nikkors. While the D700 is way too heavy, I'm looking for a smaller form...

Plan B is to enhance and enforce plan A.

The base iso performance should be good enough. Anyway, my Samsung fridge is great :)

The base iso performance should be good enough. Anyway, my Samsung fridge is great, it has an outer metallic cover ... same as the nx210 :)

The IQ at base ISO is excellent for such a small sensor. However, high ISO performance is steps behind its rivals. That is unforgivable in nowadays technology.

People need a pancake zoom like the pana X 14-42 but w/o the infamous 1/60-1/160 shutter speed deadzone blurry pic problem :)

For APS-C sensor, we've to go for their D3200. That's what they want!

I will not consider 14-24 :too heavycannot use filter to protect the front element (very important)range is too shortf2.8 is nice to have but not that necessary (but then no VR)quite expensiveI...

No surprise! That's why I would stay away from Sigma. Although their products are improving (internal and external design) in recent years, their reliability (especially in the aspect of AF) is...

i.....c :)

The 1.4D is very sharp on my D700 and f1.4 is very usable. However, the AF was sometimes not that reliable (even I was using f5.6, not large apertures). I have no such problem with AF-S lenses. ...

It seems all or most of the reviewers over the net are using version 0.2. So, they're getting the first batch of production version?

It seems all or most of the reviewers over the net are using version 0.2. So, they're getting the first batch of production version 1?