futile32

Lives in United Kingdom United Kingdom
Joined on Aug 2, 2004
About me:

Mamiya RZ67 Pro II.
Bronica SQA.
Fuji GS645S.
Fuji GSW690III.
Agfa Billy Record (6x9).

Canon G9.

Contour HD.
GoPro HD Hero 1.

Minolta 404si.
Minolta 5.
Minolta 7.

Minolta 7D.
Sony A700.
Sony NEX5.
Sony NEX7.

Minolta 28mm f2.8.
Minolta 50mm f1.7.

Voigtlander Nokton Classic 35mm f1.4.
Samyang 85mm f1.4.

Sigma 12-24mm f4-5.6.
Sigma 15mm f2.8.
Sigma 24-70mm f2.8.
Tamron 90mm 1:1 f2.8.
Tamron 70-300mm 1:2 f4-5.6.

Sony CZ16-80mm f3.5-4.5.
Sony CZ70-300mm f4.5-5.6 SSM.

Sony 20mm f2.8.
Sony 28mm f2.8.
Sony 50mm f1.4.
Sony CZ85mm f1.4.
Sony 135mm STF f2.8.

Sony 35mm f1.8 SAM.
Sony 50mm f1.8 SAM.
Sony 85mm f2.8 SAM.

Fujinon 25mm f1.4 CCTV.
Industar 69 28mm f2.8.
SLR Magic 28mm f2.8.
Fujinon 35mm f1.7 CCTV.
Konica 40mm f1.8.

Sony 16mm f2.8.
Sony 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 (black).
Sony CZ24mm f1.8.
Sony 50mm f1.8 OSS.

Sigma 30mm f2.8 DN.

Sony LA-EA1.
Sony LA-EA2.
Sony 2x Teleconverter.

Minolta 5600HS.
Sony F43AM.
Metz Mecablitz 15 MS-1.
Yongnuo YN-560 [x3].
Vivitar 285hv [x3].

Comments

Total: 188, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
On article Alpha dog: Hands-on with Sony a7R II (1118 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rooru S: DPR team, could you ask about Sony Teleconverters and A-mount lens compatibility via LA-EA adapters with this new model?

@Rooru S
Tested the 1.4x TC with my 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 (making f6.7-8). It couldn't grab focus. So I assume the LA-EA4 requires at least F5.6 light to focus.

Fingers crossed the LA-EA3 + A7RII will beable to at least manage f8, that would be nice.

Link | Posted on Jun 18, 2015 at 23:02 UTC
On article Alpha dog: Hands-on with Sony a7R II (1118 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rooru S: DPR team, could you ask about Sony Teleconverters and A-mount lens compatibility via LA-EA adapters with this new model?

@Rooru S I literally just got a Kenko 1.4x DGX TC and tested it out on my LA-EA4 with Tamron 70-200mm F2.8 Lens. AutoFocus seems to work fine. I have a 2.0x coming next week too, so will test that one too and try them stacked also. This is all on my A7R body.

I do own the Sony 2.0x TC but don't actually have a lens anymore to use it on, so can't try that one.

Is its possible your Lens/TC combo is just too dark for AF to work?

Link | Posted on Jun 18, 2015 at 22:43 UTC
On article Canon PowerShot G3 X gets official introduction (228 comments in total)
In reply to:

futile32: G series got big... Suppose its competing with the super zooms now. Definately impressive range. Shame no 4k though

a little surprised that no slowmotion fps mode either

Link | Posted on Jun 18, 2015 at 04:22 UTC
On article Canon PowerShot G3 X gets official introduction (228 comments in total)

G series got big... Suppose its competing with the super zooms now. Definately impressive range. Shame no 4k though

Link | Posted on Jun 18, 2015 at 04:20 UTC as 68th comment | 2 replies
On article Alpha dog: Hands-on with Sony a7R II (1118 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rooru S: DPR team, could you ask about Sony Teleconverters and A-mount lens compatibility via LA-EA adapters with this new model?

@Rooru S my post was directed at 'Jeff Svuk' comment.

I do own a 2TC but never used it on my LA-EA4 so that would explain why I never knew about the issue. I wasn't questioning whether it was true, just 'laughing' that Jeff Svuk assumed that DPR should know about all these problems.

Glad you are asking about it and hopefully someone who has a communication line to Sony can find out the answer...

If I had to guess, I wonder if the reduced light from the TC meant that the AF points in the LA-EA4 didn't work? This might mean that on the A7RII the problem is solved, as I thought I read that the On Sensor AF points were sensitive upto f8 (plus there is no light removed for the mirror). Fingers Crossed.

Link | Posted on Jun 16, 2015 at 17:23 UTC
In reply to:

futile32: I wonder if this will finally convince Sigma and Tamron to get on board with the FE lenses. I know it probably not that beneficial for them given Sony is only a piece of their market, but damn I want some Sigma Arts in FE mount.

@Everylast66 yeah I saw they re-released them with a metal looking body, was tempted at one point cause of the bundle deal they had going, when both the 19mm and the 30mm together only cost like $300 or something.

The 30mm was a nice lens for the price, I rarely used it after I got the 24mm f1.8 Zeiss (as you might imagine). But I still have it now. I recall it having the knocking sound internally when not mounted onto a body that was weird.

Anyways, point is... Sigma have always been making lenses for the E-Mount, and I'm glad they did. It died down alot though, predominently because of the mounts uncertainty, but its looking robust now, and I seriously hope we start seeing some ARTs in native FE format. Even the amazing 18-35 f1.8 for the APS-C E-mounts would be cool, if they could find a way to distill its size a tad.

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2015 at 17:30 UTC
On article Alpha dog: Hands-on with Sony a7R II (1118 comments in total)
In reply to:

DuxX: Fantastic camera but I can't shoot without OVF. Sorry Sony.

On the Sony changing the ISO makes a difference upto iso3200 (on the A7R), but you have to have the setting turned on to reflect that in the EVF/LCD (live preview I think).

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2015 at 01:59 UTC
In reply to:

futile32: I wonder if this will finally convince Sigma and Tamron to get on board with the FE lenses. I know it probably not that beneficial for them given Sony is only a piece of their market, but damn I want some Sigma Arts in FE mount.

@Everlast66 this was how I remembered it too, infact I recall buying the original Sigma 30mm dn E-Mount for my NEX-5 (the first ever E-mount). The lens was available only 6 months after the launch of the NEX5.

3rd Parties have been able to make lenses for Sony E-Mount since the start. There just wasn't a good reason to invest alot of effort in it, cause it was a new system in its infancy. Now though...

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2015 at 01:48 UTC
On article Alpha dog: Hands-on with Sony a7R II (1118 comments in total)
In reply to:

DuxX: Fantastic camera but I can't shoot without OVF. Sorry Sony.

@TrojMacReady there is no easy way for me to prove this, but I have the A7R in hand in a dark room. F1.8 at 25600 iso (although EVF doesn't get brighter than 3200iso), its far darker than just looking at the room. Hands down focusing will be easier if it was OVF.

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2015 at 01:34 UTC
On article Alpha dog: Hands-on with Sony a7R II (1118 comments in total)
In reply to:

bovverwonder: I just sold my Canon FF the same day the Sony A7R II was announced. I was sold that quick! I also shoot with Oly EM5 mk2 and Fuji XT1 (which I both love!) so I'm familiar with mirrorless. I was a Canon fanboy (heavily invested) and so are millions of shooters but I saw the light and had to get out of my comfort zone. Going to sell the remaining of all my L lenses/speedlights to fund the A7RII and a few Sony lenses. Bye bye Canon, hello mirrorless - it's the future!

@bovverwonder I have the 35mm F2.8 and the 55mm F1.8. They are beautifully light and balanced on the A7R. I realise they are no f1.4, but honestly f1.8 is probably a good fit considering the bokeh, sharpness wideopen and the size and weight of the lens.

I'm a little upset the new 35mm f1.4 is as big as it is, but I grateful its still an option.

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2015 at 06:59 UTC
On article Alpha dog: Hands-on with Sony a7R II (1118 comments in total)
In reply to:

bovverwonder: I just sold my Canon FF the same day the Sony A7R II was announced. I was sold that quick! I also shoot with Oly EM5 mk2 and Fuji XT1 (which I both love!) so I'm familiar with mirrorless. I was a Canon fanboy (heavily invested) and so are millions of shooters but I saw the light and had to get out of my comfort zone. Going to sell the remaining of all my L lenses/speedlights to fund the A7RII and a few Sony lenses. Bye bye Canon, hello mirrorless - it's the future!

I don't know much about Canon gear other than most people say they are good. I'm really curious to see how they stack up resolving power wise now that canon have a High MP sensor.

The Sony's seem to do pretty well on the 36mp sensor, and the newer nano coated glass for Nikon the same.

I'm sure in the next few months we will see A7R II and 5DSR comparisons popping up using L glass. I'm really curious what it shows.

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2015 at 06:57 UTC
On article Alpha dog: Hands-on with Sony a7R II (1118 comments in total)
In reply to:

Scottelly: Is anyone else wondering why this sensor gets BSI? I mean aren't there 24 MP APS-C size sensors out there that are like WAY more densely packed with photo-sites? Why aren't THEY made in the BSI configuration?

@TwoMetreBill haha throws away 90% of image quality. too funny

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2015 at 06:42 UTC
In reply to:

amiripour: 4K Sample Video looks great. Does anybody know if you can use Fuji X lenses with this Sony. thx

@teddoman From what I've read, it definitely seems that APS-C Lenses will work for the Super 35mm Crop mode. See my Forum Posts: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/55983552

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2015 at 04:23 UTC
On article Alpha dog: Hands-on with Sony a7R II (1118 comments in total)
In reply to:

lensberg: Wish Sony would swipe a few of Canon's or Nikon's engineers... They have amazing technology... but their overall image processing still needs a little catching up to do compared to these two stalwarts...

And with Sony corps money its really shouldn't be a problem...

@lensberg Thanks for the info. I own the RX100III and the A7R and I have never had any issue with the Noise pattern.

Perhaps I have not used super high ISOs, or not inspected so closely.

I thought Sony fixed the noise reduction in raw stuff back in the A700. I recall the update itself that bright it inline with the D300 results.

Since then I haven't had reason to suspect that sony's RAWs were cooked?

Link | Posted on Jun 13, 2015 at 23:42 UTC
In reply to:

technotic: Why not usb3?

@wimpishsundew that was pretty much what I managed to determine too. My SD cards only read at 45MB/s anyways, I know there are ones that do 90 odd, but its not a huge deal for me at least.

I can see how it might be a bottle neck for those tethered shooting though.

Link | Posted on Jun 12, 2015 at 23:14 UTC
In reply to:

Ben Stonewall: What's that you say? No GPS, no built in flash!
Could do better Sony.
Guess I'll just have to wait for the mark-III.

GPS would be nice, but honestly it was a battery killer, and never really performed well, if you are in the habbit of powering on and off your device between shots.

I personally travel with a GPS data logger that I use for months at a time. Battery tends to last about 4 days and storage will last at least 4 months. I just sync up the shots with the logs files. There is free software to do it.

Link | Posted on Jun 12, 2015 at 23:12 UTC
In reply to:

Josh SZ: First, congrats to Sony and it seems to be a dream camera to have.
All exciting things aside, I think those concerns of battery life, lack of on-body flash (source for remote flash) and missing of second memory card are valid for professional uses. I believe that is where a “smart vertical grip” can get in play – meaning a grip packing in high capacity batteries, providing the second memory card and adding a flash to trig remote flashes. This way the camera can still be small for traveling and professionals will have what they need for serious work. Necessary for 7RII but for future generations.
- Josh

hey they gotta leave some features for the pro range 'A9'. Bet that guys is gonna be a beast.

Link | Posted on Jun 12, 2015 at 23:10 UTC
In reply to:

amiripour: 4K Sample Video looks great. Does anybody know if you can use Fuji X lenses with this Sony. thx

Yeah I was blown away by the sharpness. Seems to be far better than the A7R at least. Looking forward to see how this Super 35mm mode works.

Link | Posted on Jun 12, 2015 at 23:09 UTC
On article Alpha dog: Hands-on with Sony a7R II (1118 comments in total)
In reply to:

DuxX: Fantastic camera but I can't shoot without OVF. Sorry Sony.

@RichRMA this really isn't what I experience using my A7R viewfinder. If I point the camera in a dark room (that I can see in) the EVF shows nothing but black and static. If I take a photo and its say a 5 second exposure, then sure I suddenly see more than my eye could. But that is not the same as being as useful and clear as an OVF in low light.

I don't know the EV rating by which the EVF is useful I'm sure someone here does, but at least on my Sony cameras, it does not see in the dark better than my eyes do (in real time.. which is what a view finder is for).

Link | Posted on Jun 12, 2015 at 17:09 UTC
On article Alpha dog: Hands-on with Sony a7R II (1118 comments in total)
In reply to:

DuxX: Fantastic camera but I can't shoot without OVF. Sorry Sony.

Personal experience with the sony oled evfs has shown me that low light is better with ovfs. Evfs don't see in the dark bettervthan my eyes when they adjust, fact.

Link | Posted on Jun 12, 2015 at 08:07 UTC
Total: 188, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »