ericN2

ericN2

Lives in United Kingdom Staffordshire, United Kingdom
Works as a Retired Professional
Joined on Apr 2, 2005
About me:

Fuji X100S w. fixed 23mm lens
Fuji x-Pro-1 with 35mm f1.4 lens
Fuji X-E2 with 27mm - 14mm - 18mm lenses
Pana GM-1 [Black] Body - super compact for use with Pancake lenses I have
Oly 17mm f1.8 - really super lens on the GM-1
Canon G15 - incredible bargain buy - incredible camera !! .. lovely
Sony RX100 - excellent .. belies its compact size
Bought G3 - Mint as new - mostly for EVF+artic LCD - Excellent.. although still prefer the GX1
Bought Pana GX1 - MINT as new, VERY minor shutter count - Exc.
Olympus XZ-1 - finally got one at a good price - very nice small camera
Samsung NX10 with 30mm - 20-50mm - 18-55mm
Canon S95 now added - nice carryable one !
Oly E-P1 w. 14-42 lens .. originally used this camera with the 20mm Pancake lens
Pannie 14-45 lens bought seperately to use with the E-P1 or the GF-1 , as fancied
Pannie 14mm Pancake lens - prefer this to the 20mm
Panny GF-1 .. bought with the super 20mm Pancake lens
Ricoh GX200 - still nice camera to use - very good results
Panasonic LX3 w.leather case (now gifted to Grand-daughter)
Fuji F31 - excellent vintage P&S
Panny FX150 - little mini-carry - excellent for pocketability
Canon Ixus800 (SD700) - VERY good little cam
Panny LX2
Panny TZ3
Fuji E900
Panasonic LC-1 (reminds me of Leica 'M' days !!) .. alas sensor gone bust ! .. now scrap !
Olympus 8080 - (lovely cam but unused now)
+ my old original first Canon G1, and even my very first ever digi-cam - Sony F55E - still works great !
Leica Minilux Zoom FILM cam - 'gold' look finish - real Leica one
.. and not forgetting my dear Hasselblad 2000FC w. 100mm f2 Planar - my treasure between 1982 and 1997 - alas now set aside and nobody wants ..

Comments

Total: 3, showing: 1 – 3
On Samsung NX mini First Impressions Review preview (566 comments in total)

I'm a Samsung admirer and enthusiast since the NX-10 but if this won't take the Pancake lens of the originals I'm just not interested in yet another new one.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 12, 2014 at 10:34 UTC as 19th comment | 1 reply
On Just deployed: New dpreview.com forums system article (699 comments in total)

A little bit constructive I hope....

What exactly is the purpose or worth of the 'Votes' space taken up against each and every post in all Forum threads...

If the style of the "old" Forum is to be carried on...NO POSTS are ever going to be removed by age so will last forever...votes simply do not matter..the heading of a post probably decides more than anything whether a person looks at it.. and more to the point here.. the space wasted right now on the "Votes" column could and should be used to show the NAME of the O.P. as it always has done. Seeing the name by having to change to the full expanded view is no good..you immediately then lose the compactness of the listings..bad enough as it is now, with the line spacing being so much more than it used to be.

Can't we go back to the old style in this respect.. heading of post AND name of poster.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 4, 2012 at 21:55 UTC as 128th comment
On Just deployed: New dpreview.com forums system article (699 comments in total)

Is it possible please that when I type ANY reply or indeed make a NEW post to a new thread..do I ALWAYS have to continually keep UN-ticking that dratted box at the bottom of the post, to say or indicate that I do NOT want any note if a response comes in.

Why cannot I UNTICK the box and it then be treated as UNTICKED for every post I make thereafter..until I myself may decide otherwise..

Same with Notifications...my Profile ALREADY shows a tick/cross in EVERY box saying that I do NOT want notifications..yet my incoming mailbox STILL keeps getting what is a useless mail-note .. of which I have quite enough already, as do so many..with the blasted rubbish mails these days.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 4, 2012 at 10:06 UTC as 227th comment
Total: 3, showing: 1 – 3