RLPhotoAndImaging

RLPhotoAndImaging

Lives in United States Long Island/NYC, NY, United States
Joined on Sep 4, 2011

Comments

Total: 48, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »

Seems to me that Nikon is just looking to actually make some $ back from the cesspool that was the J1.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2013 at 02:50 UTC as 11th comment
On IMG_0077 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Too bad there's no highlight priority setting. The frequent overexposure issue of the S series seems to live on.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 8, 2013 at 00:41 UTC as 1st comment
On IMG_0072 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Looks like the S120 still has the occasional overexposure issues that the previous two S models did.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 8, 2013 at 00:39 UTC as 1st comment
On 17 signs that you were alive before digital photography article (149 comments in total)

I know what all are and have used nearly all of them, but that was looooooong ago.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 10, 2013 at 04:39 UTC as 18th comment

I think many here might be over-analyzing what I see as a wonderful, ongoing album of a chronicle of a little girl's life through the eyes of her loving father, in a creative, comical, and sometimes intimate way.
Viewing this album makes me jealous that I lack many captured moments with my daughters, and therefore in my book, this succeeds immensely.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 10, 2013 at 04:37 UTC as 18th comment | 3 replies
On Photo collages record passage of time in 'slices' article (33 comments in total)

Creative. I might try it myself if I ever get the time.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 10, 2013 at 04:18 UTC as 9th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

lattesweden: Are you allowed to publish some one elses (the theifs) pictures taken on your stolen gear or is it copyright intrusion from a legal point of view?

Posting images uploaded from a stolen device by the suspected thief or the buyer of the stolen device from that thief is about as unlawful as posting images from your surveillance camera of a person stealing a package from your front porch... Which is not at all, should you need that clarification.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 10, 2013 at 04:15 UTC
In reply to:

tabloid: There is a thing in law called 'common sense'

The 'youth' either took pictures of himself (which we all know he did).

Or the 'youth' sold it to another' youth' who knew it was a hot phone, as there was no proof of ownership from the seller. (common sense)

If the thief was going to sell it to legitimate phone purchasing company, he would have to have given them a specific code number inside the phone. (common practice), which would not be a good idea from the thief's point of view, as it would have come up as 'stolen'.

So he has 2 alternatives.
Keep the phone, or sell it to another 'youth' without any proof of ownership.
The buyer will of course know that that if he is sold a mobile phone on the cheap from a dodgy looking youth...lol, then unless he is a total moron he will know that its stolen.

I rest my case

Common sense is what is used in enforcing current laws. While it does not in itself act as the end all of justice, it is a vital tool in bringing suspects to forums where they can be judged.
There are millions of people who use common sense for this very purpose every day, all over the world. They're called cops.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 10, 2013 at 04:09 UTC
In reply to:

Peiasdf: 1. Don't you need a release or something to post picture of a suspect?

2. If this phone was resold to an unsuspecting individual, in many case oversea because they can only afford 2nd hand iPhones, all you have done is posting photo of its new owner.

The "unsuspecting individual" is also committing a crime for buying stolen goods, so posting images of whoever possesses the property is fine by me.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 10, 2013 at 04:05 UTC

Cool but it sucks that I'd have to remove my case before each use.

Direct link | Posted on May 19, 2013 at 01:57 UTC as 5th comment
On Adobe Photoshop CS6 for Photographers article (54 comments in total)

Looks promising, and actually informative and well written, in contrast to that from Kelby.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 4, 2012 at 20:22 UTC as 31st comment
On ISO_12800 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (34 comments in total)

Low noise level is really amazing for a compact camera... thanks to the large sensor, but ouch on that price tag!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 17, 2012 at 03:15 UTC as 5th comment

The M750 is under $170 and available for preorder at amazon.com with a 3/31/2012 release date. I just might bite. I need a decent, cheap knock around camera.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 10, 2012 at 19:26 UTC as 15th comment
On Former CEO Woodford ends Olympus takeover battle article (46 comments in total)

Wow, the fact that the whistle blower is shot down by main Japanese investors clearly shows that these investors also have things to hide.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2012 at 20:22 UTC as 3rd comment | 3 replies

It's a shame that due to the p!ss poor management over the past decade or so, that what once was a glorious and innovative company, has fallen into a mass of sh!t.
To Kodak execs: Congrats. You've managed to do nothing but waste $, pay yourselves huge amounts for crap performance, and prove to the world how worthless human beings you are.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 5, 2012 at 20:47 UTC as 8th comment
On Just Posted: Canon PowerShot S100 review article (134 comments in total)

Before selling my LX5, I found myself reaching for my wife's S95. Now, we can't wait till our preordered S100 arrives.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 25, 2011 at 22:54 UTC as 16th comment
On Mirrorless Roundup 2011 article (429 comments in total)

OK, so if they use the same APS-C sensors that are in their DSLRs, why can't they also use the same lenses? If Canon released a mirrorless body that used my EF lenses, I'd probably buy one. Until then, I'm enjoying my S100 and plan to buy the G13. My EOS system remains as my pro-gear.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 21, 2011 at 03:26 UTC as 46th comment | 6 replies
On Buyer's Guide: Enthusiast raw-shooting compact cameras article (286 comments in total)
In reply to:

Bob Yarbrough: OK ...from the article we JPEG shooters should try RAW.

We need guidance for an Easy To Use RAW program ! I have a Fuji X10.

The only RAW software I've ever used is ACR which is included in APS that I always have the latest of anyways.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 18, 2011 at 16:58 UTC
On Buyer's Guide: Enthusiast raw-shooting compact cameras article (286 comments in total)
In reply to:

Flashback: I'm not seeing the Studio Comparison Tool. Is this link broken?

Everyone should be using Chrome now anyways.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 18, 2011 at 16:39 UTC
On Buyer's Guide: Enthusiast raw-shooting compact cameras article (286 comments in total)
In reply to:

Alberto Battelli: Please help me decide. I already have the Samsung, LX5, and Oly, and for Xmas I just know I'm getting the X10. I can see Santa with my X10 in his bag, travelling.
The question is, what do I do in January, when I should really only keep two at the most? Pick two for me.

So you dump your DSLR gear and replace it with many mediocre compacts that you know you'll hardly ever be happy with? Ummm, ok?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 18, 2011 at 16:38 UTC
Total: 48, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »