njlarsen

I think you must have had a bad copy. I get Sharp moon shots when zoomed in completely. Niels

Small size body -- but what about lenses, these are still the APC size it seems

Niels

The real killer is not the mosquito but the plasmodium parasite carried by the mosquitoNiels

Look at https://getsatisfaction.com/acdsystems/topics/pro6_performance_on_the_microsoft_surface_proNiels

Good for you. However, it does not leave me with a lot of confidence in the weather sealing on this camera.Niels

I would not want to be without the 100-300, anything shorter is just not long enough. If you want to save some cash, I would stick with the 14-42 and live with having a little gap from 42-100 (crop...

I think only you can really say for sure. Did you see the review of GH3/100-300 used for safari by a pro?...

Did you see the review of GH3/100-300 used for safari by a pro? http://www.naturalexposures.com/corkboard/testing-panasonics-newest-micro-four-thirds-camera-the-gh3/I think that will give you a...

Now we just need a forum optimized for PC users. The combination of font and colors chosen means that the list of topics is very near unreadable. I guess I should be thankful for not wasting my...

I have had OK results with the pana 100-300, but one important thing is to just not take one photo. I usually take 10-20 total in series of 2-4 at a time with my Pana GH2: usually one is definitely...

It sounds to me like you really have answered your own question. I am a primarily wildlife shooter and have the 100-300 for my GH2 and am very happy. One thing I have noticed is that if I have a...

Nice comparison, I just wish their 100-300 had been zoomed to 300 in that viewNiels

As a DAM program, LR chose to use import. That is not a necessary choice, ACDSee uses also a centralized database but will catalog any file in a folder you have browsed to inside of ACDSee (except...

I just looked it up, a canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM is about 1.2 kg. That is about the max weight I am willing to carry around. A similarly specked Pana lens would be really nice!Niels

I could probably live with a slightly higher cost, but the one thing I do not see myself doing is to carry a 2-3 kg (4-6 lbs) lens around. Niels

Even if it was a 200-400 that was 5.6 at the high end (but even higher quality than the current 100-300), I would likely buy one. Niels

I like the composition in post one, it works great for me.As someone who does a lot of bird photos, I have often seen a different version of the left-right rule: at least in westernized countries...

I looked at the images from first post, not later processings, so if that makes a difference, sorry. However, as a 100-300 user myself (On a GH2 if that makes a difference), I think some of these...

I think that could be read from the description panasonic published if you had cared to lookNiels

Somewhere between 1 and 2. I do take some videos sometimes mixed in between stills, but I have not really gone into figuring out if I use the right settings or not when I do (I use the GH2)Niels