GPW

GPW

Lives in Canada Cambridge, ON., Canada
Joined on Jun 24, 2008

Comments

Total: 35, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »

Who the hell need 2 terabytes of storage?

Direct link | Posted on May 22, 2013 at 22:10:22 UTC as 9th comment | 5 replies

NIKON D800!

Direct link | Posted on May 10, 2013 at 01:55:52 UTC as 38th comment | 6 replies

IT IS STEALING

Direct link | Posted on May 9, 2013 at 22:42:00 UTC as 11th comment | 4 replies
On Just Posted: Nikon D7100 In-depth Review news story (380 comments in total)

Can the buffer be fixed with a firmware update?

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2013 at 02:30:38 UTC as 16th comment | 3 replies
On Just Posted: Nikon D7100 In-depth Review news story (380 comments in total)
In reply to:

mforbes: You guys crack me up, complaining about the buffer, I make my living taking photos of outdoor adventure events, zip lining, white water rafting etc., I use Nikon gear and have no idea what the buffer size is in any of my cameras, we don't have time to spray and pray and have the guests sort through a bunch of images and pick out the ones they buy, we do that for them by getting one or two good photos of them. If you need a large buffer for Fido running around the backyard, get a V1.

It's NOT spray and pray when you have waterfowl in focus and the subject is looking straight at you and does the wing flap while sitting on the water, you need as many frames as you can get to capture the moment. Wildlife don't stop and pose.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 29, 2013 at 19:02:57 UTC
On Just Posted: Nikon D7100 In-depth Review news story (380 comments in total)

Whoever at Nikon called this camera the new flagship of DX should be "rolled in broken glass and dipped in vinegar". Nikon Should have stuck to 18mp and cranked out 7-8fps with a larger buffer. THIS IS NOT a camera for fast action sports/wildlife no matter the card used. I am using a Sandisk Extreme Pro 32GB@95mbs and I am missing shots that I would normally get with my D300 because of the buffer, IT IS SLOW. The IQ is excellent even at high ISO all the way up to 2500, NOT kidding. If you shoot mostly stills get this camera, I think it can't be beat in IQ at high ISO, in this price range. I am a wildlife photographer and I am very,very disappointed with this camera for action shots. It is going back tomorrow!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 27, 2013 at 19:39:54 UTC as 34th comment | 6 replies
On Just Posted: Nikon D7100 In-depth Review news story (380 comments in total)
In reply to:

GPW: Anyone know if Photoshop Elements 9 can support the files from the D7100

Thanks

Direct link | Posted on Apr 26, 2013 at 17:21:02 UTC
On Just Posted: Nikon D7100 In-depth Review news story (380 comments in total)

Anyone know if Photoshop Elements 9 can support the files from the D7100

Direct link | Posted on Apr 26, 2013 at 16:59:36 UTC as 53rd comment | 4 replies
On Just Posted: Nikon D7100 In-depth Review news story (380 comments in total)

I want to apologize to DPR and anyone that I may have offended with an earlier comment (profanity), it was inappropriate and non professional. Please forgive, don't stone.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 26, 2013 at 03:48:31 UTC as 80th comment
On Just Posted: Nikon D7100 In-depth Review news story (380 comments in total)

Scott Kelby hails the D7100 as the low noise champ by a long shot, yet DPR said it falls short of the competition. Who do you believe?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 26, 2013 at 02:44:59 UTC as 82nd comment | 4 replies
On Nikon D7100 Hands-on Preview preview (493 comments in total)

Again folks, this is marketing BS to make you buy the so called latest, greatest advancements.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 6, 2013 at 00:40:30 UTC as 21st comment
On Nikon issues service advisory on D600's dust issue news story (232 comments in total)
In reply to:

marbo uk: It's simple, just buy 2 D600's so your covered for the 2 weeks while it's away being cleaned every 3000 shots :-)

Two weeks!!!here in Ontario is more like 2-4 months

Direct link | Posted on Feb 22, 2013 at 20:05:10 UTC
In reply to:

GPW: Canon 800mm F5.6 IS USM EF is selling for around $11,000 at Camera Canada, so whats up with Nikon pricing their 800mm at almost 18,000? It might be time for this PO BOY to reconsider an change!!!

$7000 is a lot to pay for a TC. It is going to be a rental for me too, just don't get the crazy price, compared to a canon 800mm.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 31, 2013 at 01:21:43 UTC

Canon 800mm F5.6 IS USM EF is selling for around $11,000 at Camera Canada, so whats up with Nikon pricing their 800mm at almost 18,000? It might be time for this PO BOY to reconsider an change!!!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 30, 2013 at 17:47:49 UTC as 5th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

GPW: The 800mm lens is a company lens or for the very rich. Nikon is heading in the wrong direction in my opinion in terms of expensive lens and sub-par cameras(build quality and MP's). How many 800's are they going to sell, at that price,really and who wants a 36mp camera at 4 fps(huge files), not the average consumer. People have been screaming for an upgrade for the 80-400 and an upgrade for the d300/s and Nikon seems to not give a rats ass about what the average consumer/prosumer wants.

Except Canon costs around $800 less

Direct link | Posted on Jan 30, 2013 at 02:49:56 UTC

The 800mm lens is a company lens or for the very rich. Nikon is heading in the wrong direction in my opinion in terms of expensive lens and sub-par cameras(build quality and MP's). How many 800's are they going to sell, at that price,really and who wants a 36mp camera at 4 fps(huge files), not the average consumer. People have been screaming for an upgrade for the 80-400 and an upgrade for the d300/s and Nikon seems to not give a rats ass about what the average consumer/prosumer wants.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 29, 2013 at 21:03:38 UTC as 13th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

GPW: Garbage as usual from Don't Think tank

Not nagative, just the truth. It seems that the people who design these bags have no idea. I think that the best bags out there are Lowepro.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 27, 2013 at 17:20:34 UTC

Garbage as usual from Don't Think tank

Direct link | Posted on Jan 26, 2013 at 21:29:16 UTC as 8th comment | 3 replies

Can anyone else see where these devices can become an invasion of privacy!!!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 26, 2013 at 01:57:21 UTC as 35th comment | 8 replies
In reply to:

GPW: Nikon can spend all this time and money on a web site, but not on a D300/S replacement, A.K.A D400???

It's been 5 years already

Direct link | Posted on Jan 22, 2013 at 23:07:04 UTC
Total: 35, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »