GPW

GPW

Lives in Canada Cambridge, ON., Canada
Joined on Jun 24, 2008

Comments

Total: 89, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

GPW: Just buy a couple of Nikon D810's and go on a trip

RichRMA, Nikon $3500, Hasselblad $16,900. There is not that much difference in image quality, unless you are money blind. Plus the Nikon can go from studio to field instantly, try that with your Hasselblad.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 26, 2014 at 02:19 UTC

Just buy a couple of Nikon D810's and go on a trip

Direct link | Posted on Jul 25, 2014 at 17:21 UTC as 44th comment | 9 replies
On Nikon D810 Preview preview (1096 comments in total)

Hey DP, how teleconverter friendly is this camera. Nikon tele's ( 1.7, 2xlll ). would like to see some samples

Direct link | Posted on Jul 24, 2014 at 19:34 UTC as 33rd comment
On Nikon D810: What You Need to Know article (138 comments in total)

Love this review DPR! Now can you tell Nikon we DX users still want a kick A@# D400.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 27, 2014 at 16:42 UTC as 11th comment
On Nikon D810 Preview preview (1096 comments in total)
In reply to:

JamesD28: Meanwhile, Canon are still....... nowhere to be seen.

Just because you make the MOST cameras doesn't mean you make the BEST

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2014 at 22:41 UTC

I have PSE 12 and I just updated to Raw 8.5. Click "HELP" in PSE, then click "UPDATE". I assume it is the same in other versions of Adobe

Direct link | Posted on Jun 20, 2014 at 01:04 UTC as 12th comment

One good reason to buy OME is because they are BETTER. I hear a lot of "my images are not sharp", must be something wrong with my camera. When I ask what lens they are using I almost always get a third party lens response. THE CAMERA IS ONLY AS GOOD AS THE GLASS IT IS ATTACHED TO.

Direct link | Posted on May 18, 2014 at 18:28 UTC as 6th comment | 1 reply

Considering where it is made and what they pay their workers, SOAB of a price tag.... nikon

Direct link | Posted on May 14, 2014 at 23:39 UTC as 8th comment | 2 replies
On Little beauty: Nordin Seruyan's macro images article (352 comments in total)
In reply to:

jpdenk: Way too much Photoshop in there for my taste, and concern about what had to be done to the subjects to construct those images.

Fahmi here is my Flickr site... www.flickr.com/photos/gwhalen All photos are copyright and cannot be ALTERED/COPIED or USED in any way, shape or form without my permission. Enjoy

Direct link | Posted on May 12, 2014 at 23:03 UTC
On Little beauty: Nordin Seruyan's macro images article (352 comments in total)
In reply to:

PiscesNH69: I don't get why people complain about "overly processed" macros yet lots of praises on "overly processed" landscape photos. what's the difference?

The difference is these animals are being manipulated with wire, tape, tacks, and frozen to get these so called macro photos.

Direct link | Posted on May 11, 2014 at 21:16 UTC
On Little beauty: Nordin Seruyan's macro images article (352 comments in total)
In reply to:

jpdenk: Way too much Photoshop in there for my taste, and concern about what had to be done to the subjects to construct those images.

Fahmi, I have been doing macro photography for 15 years and an outdoorsman for 40 years and you can bet your A## that what I said above is true. You my friend are ignorant to how nature and wild animals behave. Do you honestly think that Nordin is going to say how he got those images? get real.

Direct link | Posted on May 11, 2014 at 16:50 UTC
On Little beauty: Nordin Seruyan's macro images article (352 comments in total)
In reply to:

jpdenk: Way too much Photoshop in there for my taste, and concern about what had to be done to the subjects to construct those images.

The subjects were GLUED,TAPED,TACKED, FROZEN, and KILLED to get this CRAP, and DPReview call it macro photography. REMOVE this SH#$ IMMEDIATELY

Direct link | Posted on May 11, 2014 at 02:34 UTC
On Little beauty: Nordin Seruyan's macro images article (352 comments in total)
In reply to:

GPW: Macro images created by computer, Photoshop, not true macro photography, IMO

Stevo23 your an idiot and ignorant to believe that those images are artistic. I have been doing macro, TRUE macro with wild insects in the wild with no GLUE, TAPE or TACKS for 15 years. dpreview should be ashamed for posting this CRAP.

Direct link | Posted on May 11, 2014 at 02:27 UTC
On Little beauty: Nordin Seruyan's macro images article (352 comments in total)

Macro images created by computer, Photoshop, not true macro photography, IMO

Direct link | Posted on May 10, 2014 at 16:45 UTC as 81st comment | 5 replies
On Win an Alaskan photo safari with Datacolor article (15 comments in total)

Guess I won't be buying Datacolor, HEY

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2014 at 01:40 UTC as 3rd comment | 1 reply
On Create your own DSLR external battery pack article (66 comments in total)

Camera warranty VOID, idiots.

Direct link | Posted on May 2, 2014 at 02:43 UTC as 17th comment | 4 replies

Cameras must have been made by Nikon

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2014 at 02:15 UTC as 4th comment

Someone at Nikon is smoking some bad drugs

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2014 at 23:02 UTC as 10th comment

Nikon has got to make money somehow!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 11, 2014 at 23:50 UTC as 48th comment
On Nikon launches new series of instructional videos article (33 comments in total)

Hey Nikon how about you boneheads launch the MUCH wanted D400

Direct link | Posted on Mar 11, 2014 at 21:29 UTC as 23rd comment
Total: 89, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »