What about support for D7200 in PSE?
What! no Induro heads?
Who gives a crap except the few that can afford this niche camera. Nikon you idiots
About the same DR and noise as the 7DMKll for $4000. The Nikon D7100 has better DR with less noise. Sounds like a dumb a## deal to me! Canon your sensors SUCK!!!
As I said before, to bad Canon didn't use a Sony/Toshiba sensor in this camera. IMO the D7100 has better IQ then the 7DMKll. With that said, if I didn't have so much Nikon glass, I would have jumped ship to this camera in a heart beat as I only shoot wildlife photos.
Mirrorless may outsell DSLR's for soccer moms but not for serious photographers
My upgrade path is from a D7100 DX to a pro DX, not to a FF camera. Why do I have to settle for less FPS, smaller buffer, build quality, and autofocus because I want to shoot with a DX camera? Is my money not the same as a FF shooters money? Am I not as important a customer as a FF shooter? At this point in time Nikon is saying NO you are NOT because you shoot a DX camera.
GPW: It seems that Canons new 7DMKll has almost caught up to Nikons 2 year old D7100 in sensor quality!!!
Richt2000, just having some fun with my Canon buddies!
It seems that Canons new 7DMKll has almost caught up to Nikons 2 year old D7100 in sensor quality!!!
BarnET: How on earth did the 100d win best entry level.
Compared to to the k50 it has
No weather sealingWorse sensorNo ibisSmaller viewfinderWorse ergonomics with less direct control.Slower burst speedFor more money. $650 vs $550
Compared to the SonyWorse sensorSmaller viewfinderSlower burstNo tilty screenAnd again more expensive
Compared to Nikon d3300Larger with kit-lensSignificantly worse sensorWorse video no 60fps 1080p
Dpreview crew again you give credit to an camera that recycled old parts (sensor, processor, AF system are 4-5 years old or older) and gave it recommend. This is no buying advice.
This is misleading for getting revenue.
Who the hell in their right mind would buy a camera based on DPR? You would have to be insane!
GPW: Hey Nikon, If you really want to give us something to get excited about, give us a D400 with 10fps, D750 auto system, a 25 raw buffer and pro build. IDIOTS
I knew an A@#H@#E like you (studor13) would show up. If you don't like the thread then don't F@#$ING read it, you stupid F@#K.
"As mentioned above I have a great deal of money invested in Nikon glass and I want to stay with the DX format". This is a quote from my original post, take a look for yourself.
What is your point? I already stated I want to stay with the DX format. Why the hell would I pay $2500+ tax(Canadian) for a FF camera and use it in DX mode?
Was referring to the DF not D750. K3 doesn't work with the $10.000 worth of Nikon glass I have. There's a backward thinking mentality that DX users have to accept just an "ok" buffer, fps, af and build. WHY can't I as a Nikon DX customer have the "BEST" af, fps, buffer, and build in a DX camera? As mentioned above I have a great deal of money invested in Nikon glass and I want to stay with the DX format. I know Nikon didn't force me to invest in their product, but I did because they had an excellent DX line. Right now I feel that Nikon is saying to me "Sorry about your luck buddy, we got your money now F@#K off" or go FF. Not a good way to keep customers.
Hey Nikon, If you really want to give us something to get excited about, give us a D400 with 10fps, D750 auto system, a 25 raw buffer and pro build. IDIOTS
GPW: Whaaaaat! no voice recorder, this camera is garbage.
YES, just taking a shot at the "professional's opinion" DPR posted. This camera will make many people very happy.
Whaaaaat! no voice recorder, this camera is garbage.
A newspaper reporter is hardly a pro photographer.
Just like their cameras, they receive minor updates and bug fixes
Again for all you "cowards with a keyboard" shooting off your mouth about the D750, post a link to your websites so we all can see your flawless, perfect work, if not then shut the hell up.