GPW: It seems that Canons new 7DMKll has almost caught up to Nikons 2 year old D7100 in sensor quality!!!
Richt2000, just having some fun with my Canon buddies!
It seems that Canons new 7DMKll has almost caught up to Nikons 2 year old D7100 in sensor quality!!!
BarnET: How on earth did the 100d win best entry level.
Compared to to the k50 it has
No weather sealingWorse sensorNo ibisSmaller viewfinderWorse ergonomics with less direct control.Slower burst speedFor more money. $650 vs $550
Compared to the SonyWorse sensorSmaller viewfinderSlower burstNo tilty screenAnd again more expensive
Compared to Nikon d3300Larger with kit-lensSignificantly worse sensorWorse video no 60fps 1080p
Dpreview crew again you give credit to an camera that recycled old parts (sensor, processor, AF system are 4-5 years old or older) and gave it recommend. This is no buying advice.
This is misleading for getting revenue.
Who the hell in their right mind would buy a camera based on DPR? You would have to be insane!
GPW: Hey Nikon, If you really want to give us something to get excited about, give us a D400 with 10fps, D750 auto system, a 25 raw buffer and pro build. IDIOTS
I knew an A@#H@#E like you (studor13) would show up. If you don't like the thread then don't F@#$ING read it, you stupid F@#K.
"As mentioned above I have a great deal of money invested in Nikon glass and I want to stay with the DX format". This is a quote from my original post, take a look for yourself.
What is your point? I already stated I want to stay with the DX format. Why the hell would I pay $2500+ tax(Canadian) for a FF camera and use it in DX mode?
Was referring to the DF not D750. K3 doesn't work with the $10.000 worth of Nikon glass I have. There's a backward thinking mentality that DX users have to accept just an "ok" buffer, fps, af and build. WHY can't I as a Nikon DX customer have the "BEST" af, fps, buffer, and build in a DX camera? As mentioned above I have a great deal of money invested in Nikon glass and I want to stay with the DX format. I know Nikon didn't force me to invest in their product, but I did because they had an excellent DX line. Right now I feel that Nikon is saying to me "Sorry about your luck buddy, we got your money now F@#K off" or go FF. Not a good way to keep customers.
Hey Nikon, If you really want to give us something to get excited about, give us a D400 with 10fps, D750 auto system, a 25 raw buffer and pro build. IDIOTS
GPW: Whaaaaat! no voice recorder, this camera is garbage.
YES, just taking a shot at the "professional's opinion" DPR posted. This camera will make many people very happy.
Whaaaaat! no voice recorder, this camera is garbage.
A newspaper reporter is hardly a pro photographer.
Just like their cameras, they receive minor updates and bug fixes
Again for all you "cowards with a keyboard" shooting off your mouth about the D750, post a link to your websites so we all can see your flawless, perfect work, if not then shut the hell up.
Are the people at Canon retarded, IDIOTS
GPW: Doesn't the peoples taxes help pay for these parks and the salaries of the park rangers?
Park ranger, Forest ranger, same department, right assumption, All work for the government who screw and suck as much money out of the average person as possible, by any means.
Doesn't the peoples taxes help pay for these parks and the salaries of the park rangers?
dual12: Same old Canon. Yuck!
dual12 I see you have no gear posted. Do you actually own a camera, or are you just a loud mouth A$$ with nothing better to do?
SmilerGrogan: Sigh....Canon's been on a downhill slide since the 10D.
Then don't buy it and shut up... Really
Wedding photographer: Very poor samples gallery. All photos in this gallery have been taken with static objects, family portraits and etc. This camera can shoot at 10 frames per second and examples above don't reflect the "substance" and design of 7D. Thanks.
Barney, you know you are always going to get D@#K heads on he commenting. Great shot and thanks
High ISO shots look great. Great job Canon