iudex

Of course 0,2" EVF with 200k dots is the worst EVF nowadays (but I do think it is still better than OVF on G15 y co.). But still many bridge cameras offer this EVF and within enthusiast compacts...

Look at the picture: http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/panasonic-lf1/popup.htm?http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/panasonic-lf1/ZYTOP-LG.JPG it´s great to know that the EVF adds almost...

I tried to roughly draw the curve and the lens speed should be cca. 1/3 EV better than Canon S110. So not especially amazing, but good enough considering the camera/lens size.

I imagine this is the way the enthusiast compact go in the future. Poor tunnel OVF is almost useless yet many users love to have a VF so why not EVF? Pana has shown it does not necessarilly mean a...

Another barrier broken: an EVF in an enthusiast compact. This alone is great. Of course the 200k EVF is far from good one, however it is still 100% VF and this alone makes it far more useful than...

Considering the 17-50/2,8 costs 980 USD (MSRP) and the new 35/1,4 costs 1400 USD, this new super-fast zoom might be cca. 1200-1400 USD MSRP and I doubt the street price will be lower than 1000 USD.

Please make also a Pentax mount and I am in!
I am afraid the price will be painful but with such a unique lens Sigma can definitely afford it.

We would really like to see indoor or night shots at ISO 1600 and higher.
Just like PhotonTrapper wrote, any camera can make good pictures in bright sunny day at ISO 100.

The portability and small size is the biggest advantage of the A. However this may be also the only advantage, since the image quality is comparable to other APSC cameras with good prime lens and...

Indeed. Such a bokeh by close-up shot can be obtained with a compact with 1/1,7" sensor.

Placed 25^th in the challenge.

I chose the K-5 IIs as the closest competitor and I think they are extremely close when it comes to image quality. I think statements like "K-5 II is simply better" is not possible, just like the...

And the others may see it in a different way: that the NEX has the same sensor but without the mirror taking away 1/3 of the light, thus producing better pictures with less noise. And this...

@marike: I guess the child on picture 16 is a girl, not a boy. ;-)

@Tap0: :-)

lensberg: you are absolutely right. For now however the D7100 is probably the best APSC (along with K-5 IIs) and no matter how good the 7D Mk II will be, the D71000 will still be one of the best...

Just wondering whether the images you mention are not made with the 85 mm prime (e.g. No. 13, no. 2). Anyhow I do agree that the pics shot with kit lens are amazing and there is nothing wrong with...

It´s a fair comparison since the 7D is still actual, still being sold and costing quite a lot. It´s not Nikon´s fault that Canon was not able to change its APSC flagship. And from this point of...

you don´t have to persuade me, I own the K-30. ;-)

One good picture telling a lot: http://j.mp/1024J2g Both APSC DSLRs, but the size difference is huge.
Or the other way: 100D vs. DSLR-style mirrorless: http://j.mp/1024dBs
In this context the 100D...