fz750

fz750

Lives in Switzerland Geneva, Switzerland
Works as a IT
Joined on Mar 11, 2010

Comments

Total: 124, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Joachim Gerstl: Wow! What a nice surprise. Fuji knows how to keep customers happy.

yes, you're right, and eventually they did the right thing (replace the sensor, unlike, Nikon with the D600..), credit where it's due.

Looking back at the comments, though, it took a while for them to sort it out, and there were an awful lot of negative comments from owners about it, a software solution which didn't help etc. Seems some companies learnt from this, and some didn't..

My comment was directed at "Fanboys" with short memories, jumping on the bandwagon without the "context", shall we say - every company has a "leaning process", it's just a question of when perhaps..

Direct link | Posted on May 11, 2015 at 17:03 UTC
In reply to:

Joachim Gerstl: Wow! What a nice surprise. Fuji knows how to keep customers happy.

Some people soon forget...

Remember the "Orbs"? (X10)

Direct link | Posted on May 11, 2015 at 07:04 UTC
On Nikon D7200 real-world samples gallery posted article (150 comments in total)
In reply to:

ttran88: They could have possibly reused d7100 samples and call it a day.

iudex: There is some evidence (see some older threads here) that the D7200 sensor is still a ZToshiba, and not the Sony as in the D5300/D5500, but currently no proof one way or another..

Direct link | Posted on Apr 1, 2015 at 12:57 UTC
On Nikon D7200 real-world samples gallery posted article (150 comments in total)

Whilst an interesting combination, I think it would have been more useful to have used a kit lens for the very first samples from a new camera.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 1, 2015 at 12:30 UTC as 26th comment | 10 replies
On Nikon D7200 real-world samples gallery posted article (150 comments in total)
In reply to:

ttran88: They could have possibly reused d7100 samples and call it a day.

This seems to be the subject of a lot of discussion... Is it, or isn't it..?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 1, 2015 at 12:28 UTC
In reply to:

Debankur Mukherjee: I only hope Oly kept the name of this camera model a little short........
OM-D E-M5 II...!!

Actually, most of us call it the 700D, confusing huh...?! :-)

Direct link | Posted on Mar 11, 2015 at 14:36 UTC
On CP+ 2015 Sigma Interview article (197 comments in total)
In reply to:

SnakePlissken: The DP Merrill line of cameras are probably the greatest value cameras of all time. They now sell for about £350 yet produce images that are almost medium format in quality. Experts have said only the D800E challenges them before you get into the realm of medium format. I have all the DPMs and when the light is right, or you use a tripod, the quality is astonishing. I smile with pleasure every time I open a Foveon file - they are so sharp, rich and colourful straight from the camera. And yet they are tiny, compact camera in size (not the DP3M) and only cost £350!! Best value cameras ever.

Just to clarify, are we talking about the DP1,2 or 3?

I see some offers for all 3..

Thanks.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 6, 2015 at 07:46 UTC
On CP+ 2015 Sigma Interview article (197 comments in total)
In reply to:

SnakePlissken: The DP Merrill line of cameras are probably the greatest value cameras of all time. They now sell for about £350 yet produce images that are almost medium format in quality. Experts have said only the D800E challenges them before you get into the realm of medium format. I have all the DPMs and when the light is right, or you use a tripod, the quality is astonishing. I smile with pleasure every time I open a Foveon file - they are so sharp, rich and colourful straight from the camera. And yet they are tiny, compact camera in size (not the DP3M) and only cost £350!! Best value cameras ever.

Just curious, where can you buy them for that price?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 19:37 UTC
On Nikon D7200 First Impressions Review preview (1112 comments in total)
In reply to:

zenpmd: At least canon provide proper upgrades and dont rush em. Quite a pathetic release really. /7fps on an apsc sensor is today very week and overpriced

Err, you mean like that "proper" sensor upgrade that somehow stuck from 550d, 600D, 650D, 700D, 100D and 60D...

:-)

Direct link | Posted on Mar 2, 2015 at 12:03 UTC
On Opinion: Canon EOS 750D and 760D article (318 comments in total)
In reply to:

Michael Leek: I'm not sure I see much relevance in Demolder's piece: it's typical of his very subjective approach - one that switched me off from Amateur Photographer when he was editor. Disappointing to see he's now a 'senior contributing writer for DPReview'... However, I recognise that the above is an 'opinion' and not a review.

Surely the most important aspect of a camera is image quality combined with ease-of-use and creative flexibility? Why is there such an on-going 'discussion' about pixel count? If a camera's unable, with an appropriate lens, to deliver quality images (and this subsumes resolution of detail and an ability to use said camera), then it doesn't make any difference how many pixels the sensor has!

Not once in the above piece is any mention made of creative flexibility or image quality! Lots of points comparing technical aspects and pricing, etc, so what's the point of the piece if the purpose of the cameras are not addressed?

The article was justcomparing the 750d and 760d and the possible reasons as to why Canon has gone such a route. Where would IQ come into it? - obviously identical between the two models..

Personally, I think it's an interesting article, and of course it's a subjective opinion piece, that's fine as it gets me thinking what I need myself.

I am slightly confused, as I think the 760d is cannibaling the 70d, and to some extent the 24Mp of both is getting me to question whether it's going to out-IQ the 70D anyway.. I guess we'll see soon..

Direct link | Posted on Feb 19, 2015 at 22:38 UTC
In reply to:

JMZ48: Dear DPReview... Yes, this is interesting video presentation, however not complete... The quality of the pictures and video comes mostly from the lenses and accessories used by this photographer.

I kindly request that you publish here the list of lenses and adaptors used during this presentation, also please disclose what was make of the lenses.
Your answer would be greatly appreciated.

Well, yes, but it would be useful for deaf idiots like myself to see the lenses listed too..

Sony have in the past been criticised for the lack of lenses(and somehow, while there seem to be more lenses, what lens fits what body i spoorly described) so it'd be nice to know what was used.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 18, 2015 at 22:02 UTC
In reply to:

yesman12: I go to the Consumer Electronics show every year. This year I ran into someone from the Photography industry and he claimed that DP's Affiliation with Amazon does skew its responsiveness to reviews towards brands that are most popular on Amazon. to be clear he was not claiming that DP's reviews are biased but that they have a brand filter wrt what and when they decided to review.

DP should have reviewed the 645Z. Nearly all the other web sites have.

I think nearly everybody would be interested to see DP review the 645Z, if only to see how it relates to other cameras they've reviewed such as the Nikon D810.

Actually, I think we'd all like to see more camera reviews anyway...

Direct link | Posted on Feb 11, 2015 at 13:13 UTC
In reply to:

Russell Dawkins: Why have you not corrected the specs list? You still say no microphone port. I was disappointed - I wrote it off at that point - but later found that it does (thanks to the review on another site). It was mentioned in the comments 17 hours ago, yet you haven't corrected it.
DO you have it in for Pentax?

Russell, do you work 24 hours a day waiting for asinine comments on your website..?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 11, 2015 at 10:22 UTC
On Readers' Choice Awards 2014: The Winners article (141 comments in total)
In reply to:

j900: Not one single canon product among the joint winners. Pathetically biased poll ;-)

The only thing that Canon released last year that even slightly interested me was the EF-S 10-18mm lens.

And that's only because it's reasonably good (by my standard of affordability) at a reasonable price.

Camerawise, err, nothing. Disappointing. Not the first year either.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 4, 2015 at 12:57 UTC
On Manfrotto launches Off Road camera gear article (55 comments in total)
In reply to:

iPh0to: Why somebody would pick this up over a similar priced proper daypack like the f-stop Guru is beyond me. All those straps hanging ready to get snagged by a branch. Judging from the photo, there's no frame and hip support.

and the f-stop Guru doesn't have an air-gap system, so no way would i go hiking with that!

I guess we all have our own preferences..

Direct link | Posted on Jan 22, 2015 at 08:05 UTC
On Nikon D750 Review preview (1914 comments in total)

Would it not make sense, in addition to testing these two different (potentially affected) cameras, to repeat the same tests after being fixed by Nikon (and also against a camera NOT listed as potentially suspect)?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 21, 2015 at 09:25 UTC as 164th comment
On Hands-on with Nikon's new D5500 article (288 comments in total)
In reply to:

joyclick: How long will the "SLR' survive?

@ Nindy, do you have some campaign against DSLR or something..?

I use both DSLR and (it seems, mostly..) EVIL and see discontinued models of both each year(that's where I got mine from..), surely that's the consequence of a yearly replacement cycle and not the camera type?!

I still see far more DSLR users (by far..) than I do of any other camera type except mobile phones, but that doesn't make mobile phones better..

Direct link | Posted on Jan 8, 2015 at 11:36 UTC
On Hands-on with Nikon's new D5500 article (288 comments in total)
In reply to:

joyclick: How long will the "SLR' survive?

@Nindy5

Err, that LX100 costs 50% more here currently than the Canon 100D with 18-55 STM lens and 60% more than a D3300 (with similar lens.)

I wouldn't dream to compare these 3 camera actually, but it's clear than it's neither Canon or Nikon that are the ones taking us for a ride..

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2015 at 13:07 UTC
On Real-world test: Nikon D750 at the Museum of Flight article (281 comments in total)

Superb job! very well done review, great production and really interesting content (great camera (price/performance) by the looks of it too) and I have to add that museum to my list of things to do now!

Thanks.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 6, 2014 at 12:27 UTC as 11th comment
On A second glance: two takes on the Leica X article (399 comments in total)
In reply to:

Glen Barrington: When I was 20, I would have killed for a Leica, but now that I'll be turning 65 in a week, I find, oddly, I have absolutely zero interest in owning a Leica. I don't need a beautiful, well built, reasonably competent, digital camera that is obsolete within 2 months of its release.

I feel I can get by with an uglier, less well built, but still reasonably competent camera that is obsolete within 2 months of its release.

Besides, most of my friends who would likely be impressed with my owning a Leica are either dead or confused by my inability to give up the passions of my adolescence. A couple are just confused.

My new E-M10 will likely last until I'm dead. And after that, it won't matter much, will it?

Don't encourage graverobbing.. :-)

Direct link | Posted on Nov 11, 2014 at 10:43 UTC
Total: 124, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »