ttran88: They could have possibly reused d7100 samples and call it a day.
iudex: There is some evidence (see some older threads here) that the D7200 sensor is still a ZToshiba, and not the Sony as in the D5300/D5500, but currently no proof one way or another..
Whilst an interesting combination, I think it would have been more useful to have used a kit lens for the very first samples from a new camera.
This seems to be the subject of a lot of discussion... Is it, or isn't it..?
Debankur Mukherjee: I only hope Oly kept the name of this camera model a little short........OM-D E-M5 II...!!
Actually, most of us call it the 700D, confusing huh...?! :-)
SnakePlissken: The DP Merrill line of cameras are probably the greatest value cameras of all time. They now sell for about £350 yet produce images that are almost medium format in quality. Experts have said only the D800E challenges them before you get into the realm of medium format. I have all the DPMs and when the light is right, or you use a tripod, the quality is astonishing. I smile with pleasure every time I open a Foveon file - they are so sharp, rich and colourful straight from the camera. And yet they are tiny, compact camera in size (not the DP3M) and only cost £350!! Best value cameras ever.
Just to clarify, are we talking about the DP1,2 or 3?
I see some offers for all 3..
Just curious, where can you buy them for that price?
zenpmd: At least canon provide proper upgrades and dont rush em. Quite a pathetic release really. /7fps on an apsc sensor is today very week and overpriced
Err, you mean like that "proper" sensor upgrade that somehow stuck from 550d, 600D, 650D, 700D, 100D and 60D...
Michael Leek: I'm not sure I see much relevance in Demolder's piece: it's typical of his very subjective approach - one that switched me off from Amateur Photographer when he was editor. Disappointing to see he's now a 'senior contributing writer for DPReview'... However, I recognise that the above is an 'opinion' and not a review.
Surely the most important aspect of a camera is image quality combined with ease-of-use and creative flexibility? Why is there such an on-going 'discussion' about pixel count? If a camera's unable, with an appropriate lens, to deliver quality images (and this subsumes resolution of detail and an ability to use said camera), then it doesn't make any difference how many pixels the sensor has!
Not once in the above piece is any mention made of creative flexibility or image quality! Lots of points comparing technical aspects and pricing, etc, so what's the point of the piece if the purpose of the cameras are not addressed?
The article was justcomparing the 750d and 760d and the possible reasons as to why Canon has gone such a route. Where would IQ come into it? - obviously identical between the two models..
Personally, I think it's an interesting article, and of course it's a subjective opinion piece, that's fine as it gets me thinking what I need myself.
I am slightly confused, as I think the 760d is cannibaling the 70d, and to some extent the 24Mp of both is getting me to question whether it's going to out-IQ the 70D anyway.. I guess we'll see soon..
JMZ48: Dear DPReview... Yes, this is interesting video presentation, however not complete... The quality of the pictures and video comes mostly from the lenses and accessories used by this photographer.
I kindly request that you publish here the list of lenses and adaptors used during this presentation, also please disclose what was make of the lenses. Your answer would be greatly appreciated.
Well, yes, but it would be useful for deaf idiots like myself to see the lenses listed too..
Sony have in the past been criticised for the lack of lenses(and somehow, while there seem to be more lenses, what lens fits what body i spoorly described) so it'd be nice to know what was used.
yesman12: I go to the Consumer Electronics show every year. This year I ran into someone from the Photography industry and he claimed that DP's Affiliation with Amazon does skew its responsiveness to reviews towards brands that are most popular on Amazon. to be clear he was not claiming that DP's reviews are biased but that they have a brand filter wrt what and when they decided to review.
DP should have reviewed the 645Z. Nearly all the other web sites have.
I think nearly everybody would be interested to see DP review the 645Z, if only to see how it relates to other cameras they've reviewed such as the Nikon D810.
Actually, I think we'd all like to see more camera reviews anyway...
Russell Dawkins: Why have you not corrected the specs list? You still say no microphone port. I was disappointed - I wrote it off at that point - but later found that it does (thanks to the review on another site). It was mentioned in the comments 17 hours ago, yet you haven't corrected it.DO you have it in for Pentax?
Russell, do you work 24 hours a day waiting for asinine comments on your website..?
j900: Not one single canon product among the joint winners. Pathetically biased poll ;-)
The only thing that Canon released last year that even slightly interested me was the EF-S 10-18mm lens.
And that's only because it's reasonably good (by my standard of affordability) at a reasonable price.
Camerawise, err, nothing. Disappointing. Not the first year either.
iPh0to: Why somebody would pick this up over a similar priced proper daypack like the f-stop Guru is beyond me. All those straps hanging ready to get snagged by a branch. Judging from the photo, there's no frame and hip support.
and the f-stop Guru doesn't have an air-gap system, so no way would i go hiking with that!
I guess we all have our own preferences..
Would it not make sense, in addition to testing these two different (potentially affected) cameras, to repeat the same tests after being fixed by Nikon (and also against a camera NOT listed as potentially suspect)?
joyclick: How long will the "SLR' survive?
@ Nindy, do you have some campaign against DSLR or something..?
I use both DSLR and (it seems, mostly..) EVIL and see discontinued models of both each year(that's where I got mine from..), surely that's the consequence of a yearly replacement cycle and not the camera type?!
I still see far more DSLR users (by far..) than I do of any other camera type except mobile phones, but that doesn't make mobile phones better..
Err, that LX100 costs 50% more here currently than the Canon 100D with 18-55 STM lens and 60% more than a D3300 (with similar lens.)
I wouldn't dream to compare these 3 camera actually, but it's clear than it's neither Canon or Nikon that are the ones taking us for a ride..
Superb job! very well done review, great production and really interesting content (great camera (price/performance) by the looks of it too) and I have to add that museum to my list of things to do now!
Glen Barrington: When I was 20, I would have killed for a Leica, but now that I'll be turning 65 in a week, I find, oddly, I have absolutely zero interest in owning a Leica. I don't need a beautiful, well built, reasonably competent, digital camera that is obsolete within 2 months of its release.
I feel I can get by with an uglier, less well built, but still reasonably competent camera that is obsolete within 2 months of its release.
Besides, most of my friends who would likely be impressed with my owning a Leica are either dead or confused by my inability to give up the passions of my adolescence. A couple are just confused.
My new E-M10 will likely last until I'm dead. And after that, it won't matter much, will it?
Don't encourage graverobbing.. :-)
JKP: Maybe next version will have narrower bezel. Top and bottom are quite wide. I would rather see those areas occupied by a larger screen.
The bezel is so you can hold it..
peevee1: For $300, you can buy TG-3 or WG-3 GPS, not this joke. Unfortunately, they missed again.I want waterproof G7X, without any bulky underwater case.
Too risky, I've seen reports of people not somehow sealing the lens correctly or maybe the o-rings didn't seat properly, but either way there was water in the camera.. Maybe it was "operator error", but who wants that..?!