zodiacfml

zodiacfml

Lives in United Arab Emirates United Arab Emirates
Joined on Jun 28, 2010

Comments

Total: 638, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

vscd: Why don't you add the Sigma SD1 or the Merrill cams? In the review of the SD1 itself, the camera is inside the test, blowing every other cam away, but not in the Studio update.

Is there a reason for not including it? I think it would be fair to present the advantage of the foveon. Of course it's also fair to see the drawback from ISO800 and upwards. But simply not to show any sign of it is quite surprising.

I agree. Imagine the traffic it would bring to your site.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 28, 2014 at 08:01 UTC

Isn't the Rx100 series applying noise reduction in the RAW files? I just noticed that since Nikon J4 or S1 has more detail and presence, albeit, with chroma noise.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 25, 2014 at 15:41 UTC as 7th comment | 1 reply
On Leica M9 users report sensor corrosion issue article (379 comments in total)

Replace then sell it fast.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 10, 2014 at 15:24 UTC as 50th comment
On Medium well done: Two takes on the Pentax 645Z article (242 comments in total)
In reply to:

Roland Karlsson: Hmmmm .... whatever it can do - it sure is ugly.

a

Direct link | Posted on Dec 10, 2014 at 03:33 UTC
On High-end full frame roundup (2014) article (541 comments in total)
In reply to:

Alex Permit: Strange to include the RX1R, a great compact fixed lens camera, in a roundup named "Heavy Hitters: high-end full frame roundup". While it is "full frame", it is not, nor does it pretend to be, a "heavy hitter".

Stranger still to exclude the D4S and 1DX because "they're aimed at working photojournalists and sports photographers." Its like excluding the Klitschko brothers from list of heavyweight boxing contenders because they're too tall.

The RX1 is small and remains very expensive. It is the mother of all compacts. I'd be tempted if it were $200 to $300 more expensive than the A7.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 8, 2014 at 16:41 UTC

Awesome. Someone could use this feature and then reduce the resolution for pixel sharp photos.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 5, 2014 at 07:30 UTC as 57th comment

Seems brilliant to me in the crowded digital stills market.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 5, 2014 at 07:17 UTC as 20th comment
In reply to:

zodiacfml: Seems very low power to me.... limited use.

@TTMatt
thanks Matt. It is exactly my point. Good luck on the development and the whole project.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 2, 2014 at 16:51 UTC

Seems very low power to me.... limited use.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 2, 2014 at 03:19 UTC as 17th comment | 4 replies

Oh my, a camera maker giving what the enthusiast wants? This is absurd!
I would never have thought 5 axis IS would be possible with FF.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 20, 2014 at 18:01 UTC as 132nd comment
On Sony debuts 21MP stacked CMOS sensor for smartphones article (94 comments in total)
In reply to:

RichRMA: You can't bend the laws of physics. Sensors can be made any which way, but the small ones will never, ever match the larger ones. Back illuminated, electron-multiplying, it doesn't matter. They are modest enhancements that produce a slightly better product, but a 1/2.3" sensor will never be a m4/3, APS, etc.

Yes, of the same generation. The sensor in the G7X is as good as the first 5D in terms of noise and DR....yetthe larger format can produce sharper results.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 19, 2014 at 17:15 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G7 X Review preview (411 comments in total)

yawwnn..

Direct link | Posted on Nov 12, 2014 at 16:49 UTC as 50th comment

Interesting....but will have to see how Google will respond since it has been a while that I have been using their services.

If MS could work with Adobe for integrating Onedrive with Lightroom....then I will be more interested.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 28, 2014 at 16:58 UTC as 15th comment
On 'See Impossible': Canon counts down to... something. article (1659 comments in total)

LOL! worse than a photography competition.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 15:31 UTC as 421st comment
On Post-Photokina polls - Tell us what you think article (198 comments in total)

I have chosen 1inch as the minimum just by giving thought to the RX100 and Nikon V for their abilities. For image quality alone, I would have chosen 4/3 sensors as minimum.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 4, 2014 at 08:56 UTC as 72nd comment

This is a serious camera compared to the GM1. I have seen many tricked out LXs throughout the years. It is also not comparable to the GX7 when taking lens quality alone.

Now that the LX100 is out with a fixed lens m4/3, I would love to see Panny with a prime lens m4/3, with the same philosophy of the Ricoh GR or the Sigma or a m4/3 sensor in a CM1.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 2, 2014 at 03:56 UTC as 104th comment | 1 reply
On Photokina 2014 Video: The Samsung NX1 article (98 comments in total)

go Samsung. I would love to see and use those OLED screens.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2014 at 17:41 UTC as 6th comment
On Samsung NX1 First Impressions Review preview (932 comments in total)
In reply to:

Notomb: Lost opportunity, FF right choice. Insane Samsung market. 1500 dollars for a APS-C camera?? Who buys? Pentax k3 user? Canon-Nikon user? A7 user?

Nope. The specs are high end all over (except the appearance)....and to me makes the new 7D less awesome. I just hope the NX1 gets an in-focus hit rate at least same of the 7D.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 09:35 UTC
On Samsung NX1 First Impressions Review preview (932 comments in total)

Finally, putting up a fight against Sony! It is all good but Sony seems up to something in January.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2014 at 16:53 UTC as 107th comment | 1 reply
On Canon PowerShot G7 X First Impressions Review preview (949 comments in total)

nice but too late.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2014 at 16:29 UTC as 168th comment | 1 reply
Total: 638, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »