zodiacfml

zodiacfml

Lives in United Arab Emirates United Arab Emirates
Joined on Jun 28, 2010

Comments

Total: 629, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Oh my, a camera maker giving what the enthusiast wants? This is absurd!
I would never have thought 5 axis IS would be possible with FF.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 20, 2014 at 18:01 UTC as 121st comment
On Sony debuts 21MP stacked CMOS sensor for smartphones article (91 comments in total)
In reply to:

RichRMA: You can't bend the laws of physics. Sensors can be made any which way, but the small ones will never, ever match the larger ones. Back illuminated, electron-multiplying, it doesn't matter. They are modest enhancements that produce a slightly better product, but a 1/2.3" sensor will never be a m4/3, APS, etc.

Yes, of the same generation. The sensor in the G7X is as good as the first 5D in terms of noise and DR....yetthe larger format can produce sharper results.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 19, 2014 at 17:15 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G7 X Review preview (394 comments in total)

yawwnn..

Direct link | Posted on Nov 12, 2014 at 16:49 UTC as 41st comment

Interesting....but will have to see how Google will respond since it has been a while that I have been using their services.

If MS could work with Adobe for integrating Onedrive with Lightroom....then I will be more interested.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 28, 2014 at 16:58 UTC as 15th comment
On 'See Impossible': Canon counts down to... something. article (1667 comments in total)

LOL! worse than a photography competition.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 15:31 UTC as 418th comment
On Post-Photokina polls - Tell us what you think article (198 comments in total)

I have chosen 1inch as the minimum just by giving thought to the RX100 and Nikon V for their abilities. For image quality alone, I would have chosen 4/3 sensors as minimum.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 4, 2014 at 08:56 UTC as 72nd comment

This is a serious camera compared to the GM1. I have seen many tricked out LXs throughout the years. It is also not comparable to the GX7 when taking lens quality alone.

Now that the LX100 is out with a fixed lens m4/3, I would love to see Panny with a prime lens m4/3, with the same philosophy of the Ricoh GR or the Sigma or a m4/3 sensor in a CM1.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 2, 2014 at 03:56 UTC as 100th comment | 1 reply
On Photokina 2014 Video: The Samsung NX1 article (98 comments in total)

go Samsung. I would love to see and use those OLED screens.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2014 at 17:41 UTC as 6th comment
On Samsung NX1 First Impressions Review preview (902 comments in total)
In reply to:

Notomb: Lost opportunity, FF right choice. Insane Samsung market. 1500 dollars for a APS-C camera?? Who buys? Pentax k3 user? Canon-Nikon user? A7 user?

Nope. The specs are high end all over (except the appearance)....and to me makes the new 7D less awesome. I just hope the NX1 gets an in-focus hit rate at least same of the 7D.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 09:35 UTC
On Samsung NX1 First Impressions Review preview (902 comments in total)

Finally, putting up a fight against Sony! It is all good but Sony seems up to something in January.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2014 at 16:53 UTC as 90th comment | 1 reply
On Canon PowerShot G7 X First Impressions Review preview (954 comments in total)

nice but too late.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2014 at 16:29 UTC as 168th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

rfsIII: Yeee haaaa!!!! Finally, the phone of my dreams. As a person who shoots events from time to time and needs to upload photos to client websites while the event is happening, this camera will solve a lot of problems for me.

I can only dream of that amount of money for a non serious camera. Yet, very good effort from Panny as this better than Samsung's.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 16, 2014 at 18:44 UTC
In reply to:

gxtoast: There still does not exist on the market a dual 2.5" HDD combo that allows configuration in RAID 1 (mirror). Large capacity drives make mirroring much more cost effective while enabling simple and solid fault tolerant storage.

I'm also really surprised that we haven't seen similar large volume, yet slower, SSD mirrored storage using low cost TLC chips. Slower compared to regular TLC SSD speeds, but much faster than 5400 RPM 2.5" HDD speeds.

Weird. Particularly so when considering the rising desire to have fault tolerant storage, especially for portable use where HDDs are susceptible to movement and being dropped or bumped.

Go figure. No one was doing mirrored portable USB last time I checked a few months ago.

I agree but a hard disk covers more customers than an SSD since it is cheaper and with at least more than twice the space.

With my experience, it is hard for me to fill a 16GB SD card in a day in RAW. With 32GB and 64GB cards becoming more affordable, I would not need to delete/move the files elsewhere from a trip or shoot and majority of us have more than one card. The external drive would be for redundancy in case of data corruption or lost card/camera.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 6, 2014 at 14:31 UTC

I hope there's an option not to delete files.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 6, 2014 at 10:56 UTC as 45th comment | 2 replies

Sony, here's my idea. Fixed (zoom/prime) lens, APS-C sensor QX. Touchscreen LCD at the back. Camcorder ergonomics.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 5, 2014 at 10:06 UTC as 25th comment
In reply to:

zodiacfml: Though the decision benefits many, it is baffling.
I wonder how they got the section, "a photograph taken by a monkey"

If he only made prints of these photos and not upload it in the internet, who owns the copyright?

If he uploaded it with his watermark on it? The world will never have a copy of that photo without the watermark.

If he lied and said he took those pictures, I would never have an idea that the monkey did it.

Do we know if he did some post processing here because the second photo looks perfectly aligned and centered; as though a sculptor slightly enhanced an ice made from snow or enhanced a tree branch to make it look something more man made or artistic?

Works of nature in simple words, things that is not unique or is accessible to others. We cannot copyright a snowflakes, spiderwebs, the DNA sequence, and etc. A photo will never be a work of nature or animals since they don't have a use for it, they cannot own it, they cannot create it without humans.

I don't agree but let's say that is the case.

The photo has little value until the photographer marketed the photo (true or not) it as a selfie. He could have defended his ownership as having spent time, money, and effort to market the item to increase its value excluding the expense of setting up the circumstances to make it happen (intentionally or not).

Another way of looking at it; there's a monkey trainer who trained his monkey to take selfies. Who would own the photos?

Anyway, this is nonsense. The whole thing is just about making money from the photographer's mistake.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2014 at 08:03 UTC

Though the decision benefits many, it is baffling.
I wonder how they got the section, "a photograph taken by a monkey"

If he only made prints of these photos and not upload it in the internet, who owns the copyright?

If he uploaded it with his watermark on it? The world will never have a copy of that photo without the watermark.

If he lied and said he took those pictures, I would never have an idea that the monkey did it.

Do we know if he did some post processing here because the second photo looks perfectly aligned and centered; as though a sculptor slightly enhanced an ice made from snow or enhanced a tree branch to make it look something more man made or artistic?

Works of nature in simple words, things that is not unique or is accessible to others. We cannot copyright a snowflakes, spiderwebs, the DNA sequence, and etc. A photo will never be a work of nature or animals since they don't have a use for it, they cannot own it, they cannot create it without humans.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2014 at 04:19 UTC as 110th comment | 2 replies
On Sony a5100 First Impressions Review preview (605 comments in total)
In reply to:

Treeshade: Why would beginners pay $200 more for a5100 instead of a5000? For 4 more MP, extra ISO, or the AF speed that no beginners could perceive? The only "consumer" upgrade is the built-in flash.

a5000 is priced too well for another consumer level Alpha to complete.

because this is new regardless of specs... and who says this won't be bought by more serious users such as those who would consider an RX100.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 18, 2014 at 06:33 UTC

I don't know why they still bothered....as this doesn't look any better than any previous iphone. The specs also doesn't make sense, unless....this phone would be priced similarly or less to the Galaxy S5.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 14, 2014 at 04:35 UTC as 13th comment
In reply to:

BurningPlatform: Time to switch my phone (Nokia N8) to a new one. Should I take this one, or wait for iPhone 6, Sony Z3, Samsung Galaxy 6, or even MS Lumia 1020-II?

This is what I meant..

http://connect.dpreview.com/post/8995521023/sony-might-be-working-on-camera-centric-smartphone

Direct link | Posted on Aug 7, 2014 at 10:26 UTC
Total: 629, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »