Canon EOS 60DCanon EF-S 18-135 ISContax 139Q, 137MA, 167MTCarl Zeiss Contax 28/2.8, 45/2.8, 50/1.4, 85/2.8, 135/2.8, and an adapter to EF.Canon PowerShot A650 IS
Mal69: At 100% file quality you would be very hard pushed, even on extremely large displays, to notice any JPG artifacts, indeed i would challenge you to find any at that level of compression.
I do blu ray screencap comparisons for my website and i choose 100% JPG compression over lossless PNG files because i have tested PNG against 100% file quality JPG and even at 100+ inch screen size i could find no visible artifacts in the JPG file.
The benefit is that you can use 1/4 the data, not the quality increase at a given size.
For users with new high-resolution screens, this could serve an UHD background image in less data than a 1080p JPEG.
Now why couldn't the first generation have a real grip like this one?
Eddie_Wong_F-14: I feel like I'd prefer the classic pull-push design, by my experience with T150-600.
When I rented the 70-300L, I could push pull zoom using the hood. I'm sure you could do the same if you loosen the zoom friction on this
mike earussi: Never heard of a CPL that can transmit 90% of the light. Wonder how they're pulling that miracle off?
Probably 90% of the theoretical maximum (so actually 45%) compared to other ones.
I have an old linear polarizer that lets through only 25% of the light or so, far from ideal.
Franz Weber: I like the idea of the Stylus 1 concept, but IMHO it has three week spots that can and should be impoved:- wideangle should be extended to 24mm or at least 25mm- IS is rather poor in comparisson to the competition- CA are visible in JPGs due to the use of the outdated Trupic 6 chip
I find the stabilization to be excellent.
Sangster: Only US$4490!
It would focus really slowly. Really slowly.
gravee: Can someone explain whats so special about Arca swiss plates? I'm a relative newbie to photography, I have manfrotto plates on all my cameras and tripods but everytime I try to look for a body strap like this they are only compatible with Arca Swiss plates.
They are compatible with everything else, and they can slide back and forth in case you need to balance or center your gear (such as forward and back with telephoto lenses).
Preamp: Bend the sensor... I guess grinding down a thicker slab of silicon just like a lens would be a little more accurate and avoid errors like "sensor curvature linearity". They'd surely have to make some thicker wafers first (which should be pretty expensive) and then adapt their lithography for curved surfaces (which might be even more expensive).
Bending yielded sensitivity gains in the center.
Furthermore, it is hard to etch the circuits on a curved sensor en mass.
breth: It's about time one of the camera manufacturers puts out an environmentally sealed serious pocket-able compact with large sensor. For backpackers, rainy day streetshooters, and people working in tough conditions that want great IQ.The more smartphones get better as cameras, and the more people tire of lugging their dslrs, this market should start to develop.
I did mean a waterproof GR.
I have a GR but would love to not need to baby it.
Just another Canon shooter: 1. " it appears they are fabricated flat, bent into shape using a custom machine, and then backed with ceramic to maintain the bent shape permanently. " You can make it cylindrical this way but not "spherical" (curved in both directions). But if it is cylindrical, you need a lens corrected for field curvature in one direction but not in another.
2. "with a 1.4x increase in sensitivity in the center of the sensor as well. The latter may be due...": I like the "may be". Curvature alone will not change anything in the center.
3. " In fact, a 2x increase in photon collection efficiency is reported for the periphery..." Compared to what? To a flat sensor with the same lens, maybe. But to a regular retrofocal wide lens on dSLR, not likely.
4. If the sensor is "spherical", correcting distortions can be a challenge.
Curvature changes the electrical properties of the semiconductors, since band gaps are affected by strain and the like. They reported that the sensor evidently benefited from the strain even in the center.
Ahem GR-W ahem.
I would buy it if they didn't ruin the ergonomics in the process.
marc petzold: For sure, Nikon missed the train here...after such a long time, Nikon comes sadly only with some very minor tweaks, and release this as 1.11 firmware?
Dear Nikon, please watch Ricoh, to show you an example. The firmware for the Ricoh GR is already at the next major step of 4.0 these days - and many enhancements inside.
If i'm into buying a APS-C 28mm prime lens digicam, i'd choose the Ricoh GR any sec over the Nikon Coolpix A, you even have a 35mm Cropmode onto the Ricoh, and the customization together with twin dials is a dream onto the GR Series, alongside dozens of other tweaks to the GR, Ricoh does like Fujifilm really listening to it's customers, and providing really useful - free firmware enhancements....besides that, no Nikon bashing here - i've used, loved my D40 to D7000, still using the D90 & D7000 way much.
The only bad thing - the Ricoh GR is about 100 EUR more expensive than the Coolpix A here into germany.
Listens to customers? Ricoh reads my mind!
Practically the week after I first encountered shadow noise in the corners, they came out with 3.00 which let you turn off vignetting correction.
Sergey Borachev: Nice! but how about a fix for the exposure problem. It under exposes so often without too much provocation.
I use center weighted metering and it never behaves unpredictably.
Try it; you can use the AF lock button to separate focus, metering, and composition.
I love this camera even more now.
(unknown member): The new High Speed AF mode is significantly faster - great job, Ricoh!
Thanks for the reply; that's what I expected. The Fuji X-T1 seems to do the same thing by default from the one time I tried that camera.
Is there any disadvantage? I haven't had the chance to install the firmware yet.
Thorgrem: I think the 16-35 f/4 is pritty expensive for $1200. Can get the Pana 12-35 f/2.8 or the Olym 12-40 f/2.8 for less then $1000
Those are completely different lenses. The 16-35 is ultra wide on full frame, while 12-35 is normal range on m43.
msowsun: Does it just control the aperture form the camera?
Or can it actually meter wide open, and then stop down to the selected aperture when you press the shutter?
It's missing the aperture ring, so either it's fixed to wide open (hah) or you can indeed control the aperture from the camera body.
This looks like a computer-display variant of one of those parabola things that you put an item in the bottom of and which forms a 3d image on the top.
Caerolle: But how reliable is the focus? The old version has a nasty reputation for not having linear focus at wide apertures. If you always shoot at the same distance, no problem, but if you shoot close and a little father, too, not so good.
You can adjust focus offsets at different distances with the Sigma USB dock.