W5JCK: I've got the a7 and a6000 E/FE mount cameras, several Sony lenses and a large number of third party Canon and Nikon lenses. None of my lenses or adapters wiggle or have any issues with the E/FE mounts. I think this is merely a product you never knew you needed until a slick "snake oil" salesman convinces you it is indeed necessary! The stupid are so quickly and easily parted from their money by slick salesmen. This is a totally unnecessary replacement part designed to satisfy the growing number of idiots who buy cameras, really good cameras, but have no clue about how they work and function. I bet that replacement mount fits so tight that some lenses won't detach!
While I agree that the add-on is probably not needed, I think it is a little unfair to label those who show an interest as idiots or as stupid..
CameraLabTester: "Limited product warranty on loose threads, lost screws inside camera body, misaligned mounting, AF readjustments, and other shocking surprises awaiting the adventurous tinker tailor soldier spy."
AF readjustments not likely to be such a problem as AF is assessed at the sensor.
Good to see Damien gainfully employed!
That wider focus area will be much appreciated on an a99 MkII..
The moon moves surprisingly fast...
Kevin Sutton: Anyone apart from me think this camera looks rather ugly? That faux-pentaprism is not very pretty, unlike the E-M1 version that harks back to the OM-2, which was a truly pretty camera. Cheers Kevin
Yes it is ugly, but a lot of very good cameras have been. The vertical grip is why they have gone for a 'hump' - imagine it with a side viewfinder and it would be much prettier... The bulge might have given them the option of upping that viewfinder magnification though.
The 57 f1.2 will probably be just a Hexanon - the M-Hexanon is an M mount lens which I don't think would ever be found for $30...
..but isn't it just fantastic that this sort of stuff is even possible?
I think a fair amount of the attraction of these cameras is to use legacy MF glass on them: I bought a NEX 7 about 18 months ago and still only have one AF lens, the rest is via adapters.
No, they both have Mag-alloy top-plates and chassis, but the front plate of the 7r is also magnesium alloy. The construction of the dials is slightly better on the 7r as well.
Think the comparison panel on page 1 might have a transposition - I understand the 7r has the magnesium alloy front panel, whice the 7 has polycarbonate.
Good price point for a mirrorless with EVF: if people want a better viewfinder and rear screen, the NEX 6 seems to fill the bill...
I guess if you didn't have comments with the articles you would just get a topic being opened up in the forums - might as well keep the stuff with the article...
I do however like a separate "message to the author" option - sometimes you just want to point out a typo without advertising the mistake to the rest of the internet.
Moderation of comments is always a touchy subject as there are those whose attitude towards on-line communication resembles the spirit of the old west - "I have the right to bear arms and will start shooting at anyone I think has shot or might shoot at me"; others just have an off day, or make a posting they regret while under the influence (shocking, but it happens).
The personal abuse moderators receive is often over the top, but if a moderator has acted in good faith they should be able to avoid too many sleepless nights, even if they do make an unintentional mistake.
I score on most, although I only lusted after 9 and 10...
I confess that I'm not familiar with 11 at all - can someone enlighten me?
Is it possible that the severity of the orb effect is more linked to aperture size than ISO?
Always good to see a product that is different, but I wonder why they did not try to introduce some shift as well..
Note the announcement says it will be reviving the brand for its new mirrorless camera - so I would expect the digital OM to be a digital Pen - but maybe with a viewfinder.