logbi77

logbi77

Lives in Philippines Philippines
Joined on Mar 27, 2010

Comments

Total: 34, showing: 21 – 34
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On Just Posted: Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 review article (187 comments in total)
In reply to:

Camediadude: While 250 seconds of exposure is simply awesome, and few others seem to get anywhere near to this, I still am a little saddened to see no remote and no bulb. Ah well .. why are these cameras always just SO close to perfection seeming in handling and features, and then you find one glaring omission or another. Perhaps that is where the competition can come in ... are you listening, Sonoly, Nikon, Samsung, Canon, and company?? There is an opening yet, to make that one knockout camera, the one 'ring' to rule them all :P

The Olympus XZ-1 and XZ-2 has a remote cable release and bulb mode (up to 16 minutes).

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2012 at 14:28 UTC
On Just Posted: Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 review article (187 comments in total)
In reply to:

Stephen_C: Before the RX100 this would have been a great camera.

I think the LX7 has a 24mm lens and a multi-aspect ratio as an advantage compared to the RX100.

Both are pretty good so it is just a matter of preference IMO.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2012 at 07:35 UTC
In reply to:

logbi77: Interesting to see how the XZ-2/P7700/EX2F compares to the old XZ-1/P7100/EX1.

Wow. I'll be waiting for that!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 13, 2012 at 16:45 UTC

Interesting to see how the XZ-2/P7700/EX2F compares to the old XZ-1/P7100/EX1.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 12, 2012 at 08:15 UTC as 22nd comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

Antonio Rojilla: Between the Sony EX100 (mainly for the sensor) and the Fuji XF1 (partly for the sensor, partly for the host of features and the nice design in a smaller package) this camera is DOA.

I think you meant the RX100, not EX100.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 11:15 UTC
In reply to:

logbi77: No built-in ND filter?

Thank you very much. Hopefully this will clarify things.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 10:26 UTC
In reply to:

iudex: So downgrading from 1/1,63" sensor to 1/1,7" sensor and asking 600 bucks for it? Hmmm, what a progress...

Found a quote from the DPR review of the XZ-1

"Rather than expanding to use different regions of the sensor, the Olympus crops into the 4:3 image size. The result is that it is exposing an area very similar to the 1/1.7" sensor used by many of its peers."

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/OlympusXZ1/3

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 10:13 UTC
In reply to:

logbi77: No built-in ND filter?

Where does it say it retains the ND filter?

It's not listed in the Olympus America website.

http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/product.asp?product=1627&page=specs

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 10:10 UTC
In reply to:

iudex: So downgrading from 1/1,63" sensor to 1/1,7" sensor and asking 600 bucks for it? Hmmm, what a progress...

AFAIK, the XZ-1 did not use the whole 1/1.63" sensor area and only uses a crop of around 1/1.7" area from the sensor.

Somebody correct me if I'm wrong.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 10:01 UTC

No built-in ND filter?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 09:34 UTC as 40th comment | 4 replies
On Olympus PEN Lite E-PL5 & PEN Mini E-PM2 preview (152 comments in total)
In reply to:

TheEye: The Mini has the new sensor, but the E-PL5 has the old sensor? What?

Must be an error on DPR's part. E-PL5 sample images show 4608x3456 pixels with the original image size.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 09:22 UTC
In reply to:

bradleyg5: The Ferrari of cameras. This is like the ultimate rich mans social camera.

The Ferrari of cameras belongs to Hasselblad

http://www.hasselblad.com/ferrari-edition/h4d-40-ferrari-edition.aspx

Direct link | Posted on Sep 12, 2012 at 10:50 UTC
On High End P&S versus Micro Four Thirds article (24 comments in total)
In reply to:

logbi77: Low light test:
"Here it's fairly close. The XZ-1 lens is much much faster. The E-PM1 can push ISO higher safely (1600 vs 400). The 2 advantages basically cancel each other out. "

The bike photo of the XZ-1 according to the EXIF data is at ISO 200, which is why I think it is darker than the E-PM1, not the intended ISO 400 that was written in the article.

Oh, okay then. Understood.

But one more question.

How come when I check the EXIF data with EXIF viewer add-on from firefox, it shows that the XZ-1 photo is taken at ISO 200? Did I miss something?

Anyway, this is a very useful article so props for that.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2012 at 12:13 UTC
On High End P&S versus Micro Four Thirds article (24 comments in total)

Low light test:
"Here it's fairly close. The XZ-1 lens is much much faster. The E-PM1 can push ISO higher safely (1600 vs 400). The 2 advantages basically cancel each other out. "

The bike photo of the XZ-1 according to the EXIF data is at ISO 200, which is why I think it is darker than the E-PM1, not the intended ISO 400 that was written in the article.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 21, 2012 at 08:45 UTC as 11th comment | 3 replies
Total: 34, showing: 21 – 34
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »