Combatmedic870

Combatmedic870

Lives in United States OR, United States
Works as a Medical
Joined on Oct 20, 2010

Comments

Total: 494, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
On Pictures emerge showing widely-leaked Fujfilm 'X-T1' article (373 comments in total)
In reply to:

tinternaut: Looks a tad "Me too," but that generally isn't a problem in the camera business.

Me too compared to what? Their Own x100?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 24, 2014 at 00:55 UTC
On Sony Alpha 7 Review preview (1606 comments in total)

I think these cameras are over rated. The concept is good.
They will be great for manual focus lens users.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 22, 2014 at 23:06 UTC as 377th comment | 1 reply
On Sony Alpha 7 Review preview (1606 comments in total)

So where is the fuji XE-2 review?!?!?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 22, 2014 at 22:37 UTC as 383rd comment | 2 replies
On Hands-on with the Nikon D3300 and 35mm F1.8G lens article (139 comments in total)
In reply to:

Combatmedic870: In the first paragraph you put 1.2 fx prime. I'm assuming it should be 1.8 prime.

Of coarse. Easy mistake given there were 2 F1.2 lenses released. I actually didn't even know if I was correct! Lol

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2014 at 08:10 UTC
On Hands-on with the Nikon D3300 and 35mm F1.8G lens article (139 comments in total)

In the first paragraph you put 1.2 fx prime. I'm assuming it should be 1.8 prime.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2014 at 07:21 UTC as 29th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

tkbslc: "A highly reliable metal mount is durable enough for repeated mounting of the lens."

I should hope so!! Every other lens in the history of changeable lenses has been durable enough for repeated mounting.

I dont have one, thank you though.

Yeah, i am hating on this lens though. The cost is completely unreasonable. $1199 fine.....1599 no.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 21:22 UTC
In reply to:

tkbslc: "A highly reliable metal mount is durable enough for repeated mounting of the lens."

I should hope so!! Every other lens in the history of changeable lenses has been durable enough for repeated mounting.

Except the oly 12-40. I think they put that out there asa jab to oly and there mount failures

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 20:50 UTC

Waaaaaay to expensive. Fuji for 999 and this for 1599.
You could but an xe1 and the 56mm for that!!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 20:48 UTC as 75th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

Combatmedic870: Too late. You've been one uped

This being bigger vs the fuji is unacceptable.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 20:22 UTC

Too late. You've been one uped

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 20:20 UTC as 84th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

abortabort: Funny that there were 4 lenses in the first year, 6 in the second and 7 in the third, 17 lenses in total over 3 years. Sony announce 15 lenses over two years (5 on launch and 5 per year after) and they get panned for being 'too slow' in releasing lenses for their new system?

Not not saying kudos to Fuji, they seem to be the benchmark, just making note of the perceptions across brands vs reality - i.e. Fuji are considered the best and Sony the worst.

Well, how many 18-200's has sony released. The 16-70 zeiss sounds great! But it's not even close to zeiss quality. I would have expected it to at least match the 16-80 they have the the a mount(I loved that lens btw). But it does not. Sony is starting to get a decent line up. But it's just not quite there. I actually think that samsungs line up is better vs sonys now. Even if you remove the fast 16-50.
Quality over quantity.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 18:27 UTC

Preordered

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 10:32 UTC as 40th comment
In reply to:

mandophoto: Considering the size and weight of the 16-50 2-2.8 version, it should be popular with Americans.

I actually think this is quite true. I'm american. But I'm not in the bigger is better crowd. I used to be. Then I bought a oly xz1 and the rest is history.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 2, 2014 at 20:13 UTC
In reply to:

pfzt: can somebody please explain to me how the pancake zoom works? i'm not familiar with those kind of lenses. thx.

You take all of the lenses and smash them together!

But really, when the camera is off, the lenses retracts into a unusable state in order to be as small as possible. When it turns on it retracts out.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 2, 2014 at 16:58 UTC
In reply to:

Combatmedic870: Wow, nice lenses! Gotta give it to them they have a decent lens line up!
They were the first to release a mirrorless apsc. Now the first to release a fast standard zoom. The F2-2.8 may make people to take them alittle serious.

Even m43**
Wouldn't let me edit my above post.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 2, 2014 at 16:55 UTC
In reply to:

Combatmedic870: Wow, nice lenses! Gotta give it to them they have a decent lens line up!
They were the first to release a mirrorless apsc. Now the first to release a fast standard zoom. The F2-2.8 may make people to take them alittle serious.

Apsc dude. I kinda figured that was a given and didn't need to explain that. But, dpreview. Gotta explain that stuff.
The m43 does not have a F2-2.8.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 2, 2014 at 16:54 UTC

Wow, nice lenses! Gotta give it to them they have a decent lens line up!
They were the first to release a mirrorless apsc. Now the first to release a fast standard zoom. The F2-2.8 may make people to take them alittle serious.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 2, 2014 at 16:19 UTC as 47th comment | 5 replies

We need Fuji's!!!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 13, 2013 at 02:18 UTC as 13th comment | 4 replies
On Canon announces EOS M2 in Japan article (616 comments in total)

I seen that the M2 was announced and I thought, finally, Canon it going to raise some hell. Then I opened the page.
If they put forth even a little bit of effort, they would have a great mirrorless.

70D's af, BUT further improved upon.
16x9 the screen, keep it touch(the original m's touch screen is really really great.)
Have it focus down to -3ev
Add a EVF in the corner, 1/2 inch in size(em1 type). 60-80fps at all points in time.
Add a front dail.

Fin.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 3, 2013 at 16:00 UTC as 155th comment
On Entry-Level Mirrorless Camera Roundup 2013 article (94 comments in total)
In reply to:

edu T: A 1"-type sensor is NOT, as mentioned, "slightly larger in size than that of an advanced point-and-shoot camera."
It has TWICE the area of a 2/3" sensor (fuji X20, XQ1) and 2.7x the area of the more common 1/1.7" (G16, LX7, XZ-2, etc.)

So then but the rx100 has a 1 inch sensor. ...so it's not even slightly. It's just as large.

Womp womp

Direct link | Posted on Nov 30, 2013 at 15:45 UTC
Total: 494, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »