Combatmedic870

Combatmedic870

Lives in United States OR, United States
Works as a Medical
Joined on Oct 20, 2010

Comments

Total: 458, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »

We need Fuji's!!!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 13, 2013 at 02:18 UTC as 13th comment | 4 replies
On Canon announces EOS M2 in Japan article (619 comments in total)

I seen that the M2 was announced and I thought, finally, Canon it going to raise some hell. Then I opened the page.
If they put forth even a little bit of effort, they would have a great mirrorless.

70D's af, BUT further improved upon.
16x9 the screen, keep it touch(the original m's touch screen is really really great.)
Have it focus down to -3ev
Add a EVF in the corner, 1/2 inch in size(em1 type). 60-80fps at all points in time.
Add a front dail.

Fin.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 3, 2013 at 16:00 UTC as 150th comment
On Entry-Level Mirrorless Camera Roundup 2013 article (84 comments in total)
In reply to:

edu T: A 1"-type sensor is NOT, as mentioned, "slightly larger in size than that of an advanced point-and-shoot camera."
It has TWICE the area of a 2/3" sensor (fuji X20, XQ1) and 2.7x the area of the more common 1/1.7" (G16, LX7, XZ-2, etc.)

So then but the rx100 has a 1 inch sensor. ...so it's not even slightly. It's just as large.

Womp womp

Direct link | Posted on Nov 30, 2013 at 15:45 UTC
In reply to:

Jogger: If i were in the market for a manual focus FF camera, i would get the Sony A7r and adapt be able to adapt every FF lens ever made.

Although, the DF makes sense if you are MFing Nikon lenses without aperture rings... but, then again those are modern lenses designed for AF with poor MFing mechanisms.

@just, I believe that is false.
If the NEX cameras can do it just fine. I don't think suddenly the A7 series is going to have a problem.

I have personal experience with the nexs and m42 mount. No problem at all.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 28, 2013 at 20:01 UTC
On Mid-range Mirrorless camera roundup 2013 article (214 comments in total)
In reply to:

Stephen Scharf: I'm glad that the Fuji X-E2 is on this list (as the X-Pro1 was on the first list), but I have to really take exception to the "struggles with fine green detail" comment. This might be a bit of an issue with LR or ACR, but it most definitely is not with Capture One Pro or Capture One Express. Both of these applications provide the best RAW conversion of Fuji RAF files, but you never use it in your reviews. As such, you're providing an inaccurate description of what the camera is truly capable of producing.

Also, the comment that RAW support is "patchy" is also inaccurate. By my count, there are ten applications that provide excellent if not outstanding RAW conversion for Fuji X-trans files: SilkyPix, Lightroom, ACR, Capture One Pro, Capture One Express, AccuRaw, Iridient Developer, Apple Aperture, and Photo Ninja. How can *ten* different apps that provide RAW conversion possibly be referred to as "patchy"?

I agree.

But they aren't going to use C1....or even silky pic

Direct link | Posted on Nov 24, 2013 at 04:39 UTC
In reply to:

Wye Photography: $1,600, don't forget you'll get some things for free like...

Hacking, malware, security leaks, bugs, trojans, spam, and that rather convoluted, disjointed, ill devised OS Spamdroid. But hey, if that's your bag then go for it. It's nice to know Samsung caters for those who can't use real cameras and real software.

(tongue firmly in cheek)

What are you blabbering about? Nothing but a troll.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 12, 2013 at 22:02 UTC
On DPReview Gear of the Year - Part 1: Fujifilm X100S article (307 comments in total)
In reply to:

kitsap2: This has nothing to do with the X100S, but having spent a weekend with a 24mm Pentax legacy lens on my Panny G2, I found that the corresponding focal length of, 36mm, was really fun to work with. It's a focal length that Mr. Britton describes perfectly.

24mm would be 48mm on the panny g2

Direct link | Posted on Nov 12, 2013 at 08:20 UTC
In reply to:

justin23: assuming of course it comes to your device... I love my android phone but OS updates take forever to reach the phone after android has been released.

The reason why we have the most up to date ROM's is due to, once the OEM skin is applied, its in most cases released to the public(ROM developers). They make an updated rom.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2013 at 18:53 UTC
In reply to:

justin23: assuming of course it comes to your device... I love my android phone but OS updates take forever to reach the phone after android has been released.

In most cases, if you have a verizon phone and its a year old. Dont expect an update for it. Verizon will receive the update but will not release it because they want you to WANT upgrade phones.
With phone hardware plateauing, we are going to have to put ALOT of pressure on the phone companies to release the updates.

As of right now the LG G2 will receive 4.4 in november. The Note 3 shortly after. The moto X in the middle somewhere. and the one in january. After that its no longer the OEM's. The skins have been applied and the carries need to release the updates to all phones.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2013 at 18:49 UTC
In reply to:

justin23: assuming of course it comes to your device... I love my android phone but OS updates take forever to reach the phone after android has been released.

its not a platform issue. Have you noticed that all of the pure NEXUS devices now have 4.4 kit kit.Thats because the updates come directly from google. Just like apple. BUT with Phones besides the nexuses...you have to wait for the OEM to skin it(sense, touchwiz, blur) THEN you have to wait for the carries to add their bloat, THEN you have to wait for the carrier to release the update! In many cases(verizon), they receive the update and all is ready to go. It just never gets pushed. So for alot of devices, verizon just doesnt release the update! OR they take 6 month to release it. How is this known? Because ill be running that update for 6 months before verizon finally releases it via a leak. It has nothing to do with android. its strictly the OEM's and MAINLY the phones carriers, verizon being the worst.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2013 at 18:49 UTC
In reply to:

Menneisyys: Absolutely great. Love the 4K, the double-shot, the 8M capture during video shooting, the 720p120 / 1080p60 and the stunning panorama. I'll definitely get the Note 3.

The US version DOES have 4k video.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 28, 2013 at 17:27 UTC
On iPhone 5s compared in our new studio test scene post (7 comments in total)

From the looks of it, the sensor size increase did not help at all.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 21, 2013 at 06:02 UTC as 4th comment | 1 reply

OMG, i didnt see this coming at all......who knew...

Direct link | Posted on Sep 9, 2013 at 15:21 UTC as 68th comment
On Has Sony redefined mobile photography? post (24 comments in total)

I think the QX10 is great, the QX100 is to large.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 7, 2013 at 22:04 UTC as 4th comment
In reply to:

Ken Aisin: This is what the P7700 should have been.

I agree. This is a very nice camera. I want this camera, but with a 24-200 zoom. Im tried of having to choose between reach or 24mm.

Soon enough someone will make a camera with everything. Even a fast, sharp 24-120 zoom would do. Im hopeful of the XZ-3 or LX6 if there is one.

They are getting closer though!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 7, 2013 at 21:59 UTC

Im going to get this phone. Screw an Iphone 5S! Blah!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 4, 2013 at 20:01 UTC as 4th comment

Awesome phone!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 4, 2013 at 15:38 UTC as 6th comment
In reply to:

ThaPeastenator: No thanks, I'd rather buy a Nikon D600.

This! With lens!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2013 at 16:11 UTC
In reply to:

highwave: popcorn... soda ...

ready... set...

*pop* may the equivalency wars BEGIN!

Well atleast its constant...should be a short war that will equal 5.6. there...done and done....

Direct link | Posted on Aug 27, 2013 at 12:46 UTC
In reply to:

NowHearThis: The Zeiss looks fantastic.

I agree! Something I would love to have! Ive wanted a zoom like this since I had a A300 with the 16-80ZA for a short period

I dont like how they named it a Tessar though....

Direct link | Posted on Aug 27, 2013 at 04:34 UTC
Total: 458, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »