Combatmedic870

Combatmedic870

Lives in United States OR, United States
Works as a Medical
Joined on Oct 20, 2010

Comments

Total: 463, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Fujifilm X-T1 First Impressions Review preview (1657 comments in total)
In reply to:

coudet: Refresh rate, dpreview?

Even in low light.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 28, 2014 at 10:34 UTC
On Fujifilm X-T1 First Impressions Review preview (1657 comments in total)
In reply to:

coudet: Refresh rate, dpreview?

54fps

Direct link | Posted on Jan 28, 2014 at 10:34 UTC
On Fujifilm X-T1 First Impressions Review preview (1657 comments in total)
In reply to:

ZhanMInG12: Hmmm...I'm not particularly impressed by the 0.77x EVF. After using EVILs for three years, I have found that larger viewfinder magnifications rates make it more difficult to get a correct framing, since one's eyes are strained when looking at them...I see that the magnification rate is selectable, but won't that be throwing away pixels on the EVF's OLED?

8fps sounds good, but Fuji needs much faster and longer teles if they want to win over the birding or sports crowd...

I dont think thats the crowd they are going for....most of there lenses are pretty fast.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 28, 2014 at 06:18 UTC
On Fujifilm X-T1 First Impressions Review preview (1657 comments in total)
In reply to:

Heaven is for real: Not a full frame so not interested….

Then buy an A7.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 28, 2014 at 06:15 UTC
On Fujifilm X-T1 First Impressions Review preview (1657 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jun2: will XE2 be discounted soon ?

No

Direct link | Posted on Jan 28, 2014 at 06:12 UTC

Mine! Its beautiful!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 28, 2014 at 04:33 UTC as 41st comment
On Fujifilm X-T1 First Impressions Review preview (1657 comments in total)

Very nice!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 28, 2014 at 04:31 UTC as 461st comment

That rabbit would have bit me!!! Great pics.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 26, 2014 at 18:23 UTC as 193rd comment
On Pictures emerge showing widely-leaked Fujfilm 'X-T1' article (373 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marathonianbull: But will it perform better than the rest of the X family with M-Mount lenses?

Who cares. You have fuji lenses.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 25, 2014 at 01:33 UTC
On Pictures emerge showing widely-leaked Fujfilm 'X-T1' article (373 comments in total)
In reply to:

tinternaut: Looks a tad "Me too," but that generally isn't a problem in the camera business.

Me too compared to what? Their Own x100?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 24, 2014 at 00:55 UTC
On Sony Alpha 7 Review preview (1609 comments in total)

I think these cameras are over rated. The concept is good.
They will be great for manual focus lens users.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 22, 2014 at 23:06 UTC as 370th comment | 1 reply
On Sony Alpha 7 Review preview (1609 comments in total)

So where is the fuji XE-2 review?!?!?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 22, 2014 at 22:37 UTC as 376th comment | 2 replies
On Hands-on with the Nikon D3300 and 35mm F1.8G lens article (142 comments in total)
In reply to:

Combatmedic870: In the first paragraph you put 1.2 fx prime. I'm assuming it should be 1.8 prime.

Of coarse. Easy mistake given there were 2 F1.2 lenses released. I actually didn't even know if I was correct! Lol

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2014 at 08:10 UTC
On Hands-on with the Nikon D3300 and 35mm F1.8G lens article (142 comments in total)

In the first paragraph you put 1.2 fx prime. I'm assuming it should be 1.8 prime.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2014 at 07:21 UTC as 29th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

tkbslc: "A highly reliable metal mount is durable enough for repeated mounting of the lens."

I should hope so!! Every other lens in the history of changeable lenses has been durable enough for repeated mounting.

I dont have one, thank you though.

Yeah, i am hating on this lens though. The cost is completely unreasonable. $1199 fine.....1599 no.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 21:22 UTC
In reply to:

tkbslc: "A highly reliable metal mount is durable enough for repeated mounting of the lens."

I should hope so!! Every other lens in the history of changeable lenses has been durable enough for repeated mounting.

Except the oly 12-40. I think they put that out there asa jab to oly and there mount failures

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 20:50 UTC

Waaaaaay to expensive. Fuji for 999 and this for 1599.
You could but an xe1 and the 56mm for that!!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 20:48 UTC as 74th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

Combatmedic870: Too late. You've been one uped

This being bigger vs the fuji is unacceptable.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 20:22 UTC

Too late. You've been one uped

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 20:20 UTC as 83rd comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

abortabort: Funny that there were 4 lenses in the first year, 6 in the second and 7 in the third, 17 lenses in total over 3 years. Sony announce 15 lenses over two years (5 on launch and 5 per year after) and they get panned for being 'too slow' in releasing lenses for their new system?

Not not saying kudos to Fuji, they seem to be the benchmark, just making note of the perceptions across brands vs reality - i.e. Fuji are considered the best and Sony the worst.

Well, how many 18-200's has sony released. The 16-70 zeiss sounds great! But it's not even close to zeiss quality. I would have expected it to at least match the 16-80 they have the the a mount(I loved that lens btw). But it does not. Sony is starting to get a decent line up. But it's just not quite there. I actually think that samsungs line up is better vs sonys now. Even if you remove the fast 16-50.
Quality over quantity.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 18:27 UTC
Total: 463, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »