Omg......could you just hand someone 10 bucks and do the second thing...
Iso320 minimum with 1/4000 of a second...that sucks
Mark Banas: Next up, find a 70mm Photosonics to Pentax Q lens mount adapter!
I really like VSCO'S stuff. They make really good presets. Tweaks I would have normally have though of or could even do. I know my way around CS5 pretty well. But curves can be changing and or time consuming. These save me some time when shooting.
Hold on....where are those folks saying that the fuji 16mm 1.4 costs too much??? Well here is close to an equivalent in FF for mirrorless! ;) even has the same filter size. Both are weather sealed... Great lenses!
Now shut up!
I think Zeiss may know something we don't know by releasing these FF mirrorless lenses. Other FF's on the way maybe from other companies?
No pics of the cool a*s oled? Looks awesome!!! This is how digital lenses should be made from now on (except with aperture rings of coarse)!! Mix the oled tech with fuji lenses and they would be AWESOME!!!
Combatmedic870: Nice camera.
No word on the new FE Zeiss batis lenses just announced???? 25 and 85mm
They are beautiful!!!!
I know I said nice camera! ;) I also said FE Zeiss.
But Imo those lenses are more exciting...even though I shoot fuji.
Battersea: I hope Canon starts shopping there.
Canon might not have the best. But there higher ISO color fidelity is very very good
stevo23: Once again, Fuji and the lenses. This looks like a well thought out one.
If canikon do make a lens like this...apsc lens...please put a link up. If not...just hold on to your 3.2lbs Or 1.54kg (canon)of ff dslr with 24mm 1.4 ll and rock back and forth.
Stevo23 let me know when canon and nikon make a 15/16mm prime lenses. This lens is an apsc lens. A 24mm 1.4 lens for full frame is not only going to cost more. But it'll be 35/36mm lens on canons and nikon apsc bodies. Once again....Noone has an equivalent apsc lens. Noooooonnneeeeee.People keep bringing up the 24mm but they arent in the same range as this. No full frame mirror less camera has an 24mm f2 lens either!!
So you either pick a full frame dslr( all lenses are more expensive annnnnd the cameras cost more)(since you can by a 329 xa1(that legitimately has the best low light performance of an apsc camera)....or a you pic this lens for fuji!
OBI656: Fuji creates pretty good quality cams and lenses but they do not have sensor (film) ... Unfortunately. 36 mp and up is for Fiji just Science Fiction ...
16MP is plenty for a bill board. You do know pro's use the nikon D4 (16mp) and canon 1dx (18mp) and used the images for bill boards right???
OBI656 You are a very misinformed person....
I think fuji is the only company that has made an apsc 16mm 1.4. No other company make this. Not canon or nikon. An f2 or 2.8 are not in the same league.
I've been waiting for this lens for astrophotography. 1 and 2 stops is a big deal! ISO 3200 VS 6400 AND 12800. When fuji brings this lens below 900 ill buy it.
I've been waiting for this lens for astrophotography!
Nikon actually offers a specially boxed film makers kit now.http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0060MVJ1Q/ref=s9_simh_gw_d0_g421_i8?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=mobile-2&pf_rd_r=0WX0F1KTGFGAM6GAFRAE&pf_rd_t=36701&pf_rd_p=2072522802&pf_rd_i=mobile#
tmaxxtigger: Have a Spyder 1 & 3. I wonder if these incremental improvements make that much of a difference, the old version seems to work really well already. Moving from the 1 to 3 was a fair jump, mostly in that the calibration took a lot less time.
I also use spyder 3. Wonder if it's worth getting this.
Prairie Pal: How hard can it be to design an endoscope? It's basically a GoPro attached to a rubber hose.
Lmfao! Well the image quality would atleast be good!! Endoscopes really really sick when is comes to resolution! Not even 480p!
I would imagine a f3.5/4-5.6 lens.
Lars Rehm: Seriously, the next person to ask for the CM1 or Note 4 will be banned for life :)
Step on to soap box and scratches butt....what about the S6? it's likely to be better vs the note 4....