Zigmont

Zigmont

Lives in United States Baltimore, MD, United States
Works as a Editor
Joined on Dec 8, 2011

Comments

Total: 48, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
On article Hands on with the Hasselblad H6D 50c/100c (268 comments in total)

I bet if I used this to take photos I'd get more Facebook likes.

Link | Posted on Apr 15, 2016 at 13:38 UTC as 17th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Zigmont: I like the no filter photo better than the weird one with the filter. Just because a slow shutter is good doesn't necessarily mean a moribund shutter is better.

OK thanks, next time I'll check with you first to ask if I can write an opinion in a forum that asks for people's opinions.

Link | Posted on Mar 5, 2016 at 01:37 UTC

I like the no filter photo better than the weird one with the filter. Just because a slow shutter is good doesn't necessarily mean a moribund shutter is better.

Link | Posted on Mar 4, 2016 at 20:11 UTC as 40th comment | 3 replies
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 First Impressions Review (993 comments in total)

If this had a Sony name on it, you'd literally have to wipe off the saliva dripping from the posts in this forum. But it's a Pentax, that nobody's even seen or tried yet, so expect the naysayers and trolls a plenty.

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2016 at 22:47 UTC as 262nd comment | 2 replies

I think these are fantastic photos, I would have never thought of experimenting with wider lenses, having been "brainwashed" that an 85 mm was the only way to take a portrait. I don't have all the remote lighting equipment, but I'm going to experiment with these techniques. Thanks for posting this, very interesting.

Link | Posted on Feb 14, 2016 at 23:33 UTC as 76th comment | 3 replies
On article Nifty fifty: Hands-on with the Hasselblad H5D-50c Wi-Fi (133 comments in total)

The real story would be how does this compare with a good 35mm DSLR or mirrorless. I would like to see a comparison under the same conditions, same photos in the hands of the same photographer. Not saying one is better than another, but just how much of a real-world difference is there?

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2016 at 14:34 UTC as 6th comment | 1 reply
On article Retro through-and-through: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Review (2471 comments in total)

Still a long, long way to go on video technology apparently. And call me when autofocus actually works.

In the meantime, I'll use my cameras for photos and my cheap videocam for video.

Link | Posted on Feb 8, 2016 at 11:36 UTC as 235th comment
In reply to:

Yoggie: Smart move. They cannot compete with the cheap knockoffs on the low end so they are better off sticking with the high end. The difference between a knockoff and the Hero+ LCD is inconsequential for the casual user butt the difference between the Hero4 and even the best knockoff is huge for a pro user.

If I'm not buying a GoPro at $199, what makes them think I'm going to buy at $299, $399 or more?

Link | Posted on Feb 6, 2016 at 23:36 UTC
On article Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM review (1 comment in total)

Wow, no comments for this one even after 6 years? I wish some owners would report on their likes and dislikes, seems like a good price for a versatile lens but some of the conclusions scare me a bit.

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2016 at 11:22 UTC as 1st comment

Anyone ever use an LED like these instead of a flash? I'd like to know what the advantage is. Are these continuous lights, or do they work like a flash?

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2016 at 01:10 UTC as 18th comment | 3 replies
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1175 comments in total)

Wow, I really wanted to like this but just realized no pop-up flash, that really kills it for me, I use the pop-up on my D7100 quite often for a bit of fill flash. It would be a PIA to carry around the SB400 all the time.

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 22:25 UTC as 219th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

grasscatcher: Windows is just like BlackBerry - they have, by far, the best and slickest operating systems out there, but lack of apps to make them saleable.

Universal apps would be a huge gamechanger.

Not sure why everyone says Windows phones don't have apps. I used a Nokia 540 and now use a Lumia 640, I prefer them over my HTC One and Motorola Android phones I put in the drawer. I have no problem finding every app I need on the Windows phone. And the OS is way more stable than Android and works so well with OneDrive I uninstalled Google Drive on my laptop and desktop. I was a Google guy through and through, but the Windows phone OS works so well and is bulletproof, which sold me.

Link | Posted on Oct 19, 2015 at 01:42 UTC
On article Light L16 packs 16 cameras into a single portable body (393 comments in total)
In reply to:

erotavlas: This looks cool, but there's no explanation as to why. Can someone explain what benefit shooting 10 images at different focal lengths and merging them is? And what do the other 6 cameras do?

I've had no problem setting DOF through my viewfinder for the past, oh, 35 years or so. Not that I'm against new technology; in fact, I'm something of a tech freak. But this is gimmicky, I don't see the value.

Link | Posted on Oct 9, 2015 at 01:57 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7R II Review (2158 comments in total)
In reply to:

hammarbytp: My own impressions after reading the other reviews

Overall it does not beat the Nikon D810 in a number of key areas such as continuous focusing. However in lower light and with 4K video it beats it which is pretty impressive. Compared to other high end cameras such as the canon 5DS, it generally beats them in all counts.

It could do with longer battery life, 2 cards and a greater range of native lenses

UI could be improved, including the touch screen

If you do extreme pixel peeping you might see some artifacts caused by compressed raw. This can be fixed at the cost of much larger file sizes

Overall

a very impressive attempt at taking the top crown, with Nikon breathing a sigh of relief and Canon looking very worried.

To summarize. Not the expected messiah, but maybe the prophet of things to come

Missed anything?

Yeah, it costs 2x more than I'd ever be willing to spend on a camera...

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2015 at 16:34 UTC

How come I have never, ever in all the 10+ Nikon cameras and many lenses I have owned since the 1980's, have never received one single message from Nikon telling me there's an update available?

I only catch it when I see an article like this online. Thanks for that DPReview, but thanks for nothing to Nikon.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2015 at 10:30 UTC as 3rd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

onlooker: Thanks for that map, DPR. Please keep us updated. I will definitely consider it next time I go to Europe.

Not me -- I can't wait for this law to be in place. I'll take twice as many photos and post 'em all over the place. So sue me EU. Try it, I dare you!

Link | Posted on Jul 4, 2015 at 20:34 UTC
On article A Compact PEN: Olympus Stylus SH-2 Hands-on (150 comments in total)

Make it a 24 to, say, 140 mm max with f2.8-4.0 and I'm interested. 600mm lens? Really? And other than marketing, the reason for that is...?

I guarantee no one can hold this thing steady at that range, multi-axis stabilization or not.

Anything over about 140mm or so is unnecessary for a travel camera. I've traveled the world multiple times with many point and shoots from back in the B&W film days until now and never found the need for anything over 120mm. Most shots taken at wide angle to 70mm or so.

Link | Posted on Mar 11, 2015 at 23:08 UTC as 15th comment | 3 replies
On article A Compact PEN: Olympus Stylus SH-2 Hands-on (150 comments in total)
In reply to:

Valiant Thor: I'm very curious as to which market segment this camera is supposed to be competing in?

The "Mine is longer than yours" category.

Link | Posted on Mar 11, 2015 at 23:01 UTC
On article High-end full frame roundup (2014) (610 comments in total)

Just a correction: "The Sony also uses all of it’s 12.2MP sensor..."

"It's" is always and only a contraction for "it is". If you wouldn't use "it is" then don't use "it's". There is no such thing as a possessive "it".

In the sentence above, "it is" would be incorrect, so it's "its".

Link | Posted on Dec 8, 2014 at 20:59 UTC as 53rd comment | 2 replies
Total: 48, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »