-Wait for raw files and good converter to handle them.-I still use my s3 & s5 as its the best DR capable camera available until now but is getting old..
elefteriadis alexandros: -Good for Nikon keep the Megapixel down, that give breath to improve DR which remain the big problem for digital photography.-I wait for the test in that DR department and keep my breath...
-There isn't any scanner out there ho can make a 60mp from 35mm, the imagon that we use is 9000dpi for 35mm and give about 45mp if i remember correct.-But again any scanner first of all have problem with exhibit the grain because of the way that light work in scanner.-Any way as we now the mp is just the size and nothing more.-I am not a ''fun-boy'' of film or anything, i just want the best tool for my job.-That's why i am here and wait for something REAL GOOD, maybe when the ''dust'' of mp war clear...-Until then the only way ho give me what i need is my trusted Mamyia's and for quick snapsot my Fuji s5.
-I now what he mean Stu, but the truth is the opposite, i work in the past in professional lab which we use the best of them imagon e.t.c..
-The limit is the scanner and when this is no happen is the limit of combination of lens or bad technical skill. OR otherwise very old film from 60's..
-You are right about that, even my scanner can't take out the finest detail of my negatives, they claim is 4000 dpi but under my print head i can see details that my scanner miss..-You want DR test?.. So take a negative film of any asa from 100-400 and exposure in any condition with 60 and 5,6.. and then try this with any digital medium format... (don't try with smaller you lost your time..)
-From your answer is clear you're ignorance, the megapixel is size, they don't have something to do with quality.-BUT even with that i can scan my 6x7 in my Nikon 9000 to take a 130 megapixel... How about that...
babalu: ...in five to ten years any camera with a mirror box will be as antiquated as film cameras are today .
-I keep shooting film, if you have one antiquated film camera, send it to me.
kinglau711: WOW not able to bring a single real innovation in two years !
Even incapable of adding a GPS, WIFI or a viewfinder as large as the 5D Mark III and 1DX.
-And one cable in the mind to press the button..
-You now? there is one more type of film, have a film that i keep shooting ho have a name NEGATIVE.. and that in medium format which i use for wedding, they blown ANY digital to garbage..
Stitzer23: Awesome. Stick it at iso 409k f22 and hey, no focussing required anymore.
-I don't care for other opinion dude..
-And also don't take the lens cap off..
All that is garbage, i wait to improve DR.. I am photographer no tech freak..
-Maybe you have many years to see real photograph from wet printing, its not even close.. I am not so stupid to stay in the dark for make my client happy..
-Good for Nikon keep the Megapixel down, that give breath to improve DR which remain the big problem for digital photography.-I wait for the test in that DR department and keep my breath...
-I am for 35 years professional photographer and for 20 years i shot with Nikon f3 and mamyia 645 without change anything.-Today every 3-4 years anyone ho want to stay in game have to pay the company and change the equipments...-But for company and marketing even this is not enough... they destroy the art of photography and make them boring just because they wont to look easy for everyone so everyone ''deserve'' a camera... -Well all that people maybe is ok for communicate with strangers in the street and thats fine, but its not a talent photographer and here its a photographic site not an oprah show...
-Interesting approach and engage strangers, but nothing special from the point of composition, i miss the old good street photographers like Cartier-Bresson. Maybe the easy way of digital photography make the people to stop think of the right time and angle of view.
elefteriadis alexandros: HDR? just use film..
..Multi exposure HDR imaging blows Zone System B&W out of the water in its ability to capture the full dynamic range of an scene (...without turning it to mush.).. are you kidding? The above examples tell the opposite..-Are you sure you are mastered the craft of b&w printing?..
HDR? just use film..
..$499 (US) for the 16GB model, $599 (US) for the 32GB model....Almost 100(US) for 16GB!!
Natan Lorenzi: I can't understand this war (Canon vs. Nikon). Really, people will use astronomic ISO? Really, the most of people use up to 6400 iso. I don't need iso 204800, or even 12800. Shot what I can't see? No, really, I'm a photographer not a researcher.
-So you are not astrophotographer.. you have right but people tend to be impressed by the numbers.
elefteriadis alexandros: Until iso 1600 the D4 is superior but after that i prefer D3. Canon its to noise over 800 asa. BUT PLEASE FUJI GIVE US YOUR SPECIAL SENSOR OF S3 IN FUUL FRAME NIKON BODY..
No Henry i don't buy expensive gear even i am a professional photographer, that's why i have my Fuji s3 until now and until they died, only i tell my opinion because i like the DR and colour from fuji sensor and maybe some day i buy as a second hand if they exist. As for here in Greece you have right.. but the same happen in all the rich country's as they take the natural resources from poor ones.. (the word war tell you something?) Many people in this website its amateur but spent a lot money to buy a new ''toy'', you think this is right when the same time people died for starvation?..